Chechnya was independent after reaching peace with Yeltsin´s Russia, but they attacked Daguestán. That´s why nobody should ask himself if the terrorists are right or not before leaving the armed fight, because any success encourages them more. Maybe they had the right to be independent, but they as they reached them with blood, they thoght that they had founf the philosophal stone.
Example. I am pro-basque, but I just don´t wonder me about their situation while a terrorist organization is deffending their right to be free. Many times we tend to belief that terrotists are people opressed to their limit by a huge and powerfull nation, but in many of cases I can think about, they´re just criminals who need an excuse to act. ETA is close to become a non- terrorist organization, and I will start to deffend their rights as hell in that very moment.
It is like Ben Laden. Somebody thinks he was a multimillionary arab who left their palaces to start a romantic fight in Afganistan. He was actually a non-very rich son of the many sons that a sheik had with many spouses. He left Arabia to start a host business for fighters in Afghanistan (the host house was called Al-Quaeda, the base). The press created a romantic fighter, but what we really have is a inkeeper who had luck with their opium dealing business. What a change, isn´t it?
Who is the naive now? The belicists, who know they´re evil and they will go on, no matter what we do? Or the peacifists, who think that giving them some things they will happily leave their weapons? Al-Quaeda claims the dissapering of any Occidental item from the holy lands. Spain was "Al-Andalus". So, should I accept the fact that I must leave my country to that mob because you want to remain safe?
Petter! Make a gap for me in your room! I gotta move becuase a crazy Wahaby wants to live in my home!
(Take it as a joke, matey)
Of course, any action by countries "apparently" creates reactions. I think that this savage acts would happen anyway because they´re criminals, so, we must try to strike back,playing an infinite Ping-Pong match. I know we can´t win, but they neither.
My hope is that someday people will open its eyes and see how lovely and rich is Islam... But the dangers of Wahabism, the most aggressive and radical group in Islam. The problem is that Wahaby is the majot religion in Saudi Arabia, and they use the petrodollars to spread it out, their messages of hate. Do you imagine that Texas was the most rich state in the USA, and the religion there was the KKKlanish? (Insert joke here "That´s what actually is happening!" Daniel
)
That´s what I call a problem. You see that trying to link Al-Quaeda with Chechnya makes you sick... They´re not linked, they´re in the same height, but the ideal they pursuit is the same.
The only good thing I can think I can see in all the School stuff is that some of the peacifists see that some countries are threatened, and using the Ostrich tactic won´t work forever. We are claiming help... You can decline to help us, but sooner or later the problem will reach you (I hope not, but it´s happening). I wonder if you will start blaming the countires who started the oppossition, or you´ll finally decide to face it with us.
I have finally expressed that I think that this will end with a final struggle between many nations after the terrorists have done something really great (Who knows, putting a nuke in Rome, or something).
Which is the opinion of the peacifists, your recipe? Compression and more compression? I WOULD like to believe in such a sollution... Do you really think we wouldn´t like to put the TV news and sewing just weather profiles and economy stuff? Do you really think we are belicists because we like it, cos we like to see blowing bodies in busses, slaughtered palestinian bodies? Please thell me your sollution and I´ll change my side.
