I'm afraid this is incredible nitpicking, but I'm seriously having questions regarding the nature of the two resolutions, 320x240 and 320x200, and I wouldn't mind some
I'm beginning to feel like I should downgrade to 320x200 for several reasons, the primary one being that the classic "LucasArts" resolution was indeed 320x200. It feels "right".
Similarly, the block of 320x40 pixels is not exactly small work when it comes to a mass of background art.
My main question is, then, do any of you think the extra space would be worth preserving for presenting more geometric space in the backgrounds (or for some other reason, for that matter)? Do you prefer one resolution over the another?