Jupiter ignites into 2nd SUN!! (actual footage)

Nightfable · Sun 15/02/2009 14:31:47

Please watch!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-NFNUH1dJo

Haddas · Sun 15/02/2009 14:43:10

Oh wow. With such a nice song and all those pretty pictures it's hard not to believe that Jupiter has suddenly ignited and become a new sun. But even with all that pseudo-science jibba-jabba bullshit, i'm still not convinced. I need more evidence. Real evidence. This type of phenomenon would without a doubt have been reported by all and every news-source on the planet already. It's just a damn camera flare for fox ache

EDIT: I think Buckethead said it best in a whole other thread.

Quote from: Buckethead on Mon 26/01/2009 12:23:01
This is kinda funny but sad at the same time.

Ghost · Sun 15/02/2009 14:55:53

A worthy post to mark your returns! (

back)

Nightfable · Sun 15/02/2009 15:04:02

Haha, thanks Ghost! *hugs*

Here is the site where you can view the videos. There are two folders for this year and if you click on them, you can go view the clips at the bottom of the page.

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2009/

Sometimes, there are things that can't be explained -- I feel this is one of them.

It's similar to the ufo cover-ups; someone out there doesn't want us to know, but sooner or later the truth will get out and they won't be able to deny it any longer.

InCreator · Sun 15/02/2009 16:28:51

A superb song choice! I enjoyed song more than rest of the video.

Thinking about possibility of second sun makes my hair rise though. Most of the theories about something happening of planetary scale in our universe usually end with extinction of humankind.

So, instead of light & love such videos make me think about doom and BBQ.

Darth Mandarb · Sun 15/02/2009 17:37:51

I don't get it ...

Am I missing something?

All I'm feeling now is like I just lost 4 minutes of my life that I can't have back.

Isn't it, technically, impossible to "ignite" Jupiter? I mean a star doesn't burn like a bon-fire. It's sustained nuclear fusion (or something) that makes it burn. Jupiter may be HUGE ... but I think it lacks the mass to "ignite".

Again ... I might just be missing something here.

Nightfable · Sun 15/02/2009 17:53:30

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0tdlVssk8g

Hahaha.... I feel sheepish now.

Well, I did some research and went back to August 2007 in the database. It seems like it's all just a big old lensflare.

Ah well, it sure made me hyped up yesterday -- a bit like winning the lottery. I still have the feeling Nasa is hiding and incredible amount of information from us. One day, we'll get our due.

No Doom and BBQ just yet, InCreator. LOL!

Andail · Sun 15/02/2009 18:22:10

This thread made my brain sad

DanielH · Sun 15/02/2009 19:01:00

Quote from: Andail on Sun 15/02/2009 18:22:10
This thread made my brain sad

That's not the worst- look at the youtube comments, these morons actually believe it. Some are actually argueing for it, look:

Quote from: Some Youtube Dumbass, in response to 'Jupiter cannot ignite'I say you give us evidnce then smartass.
how can you think your say-so is more credible than this video ???
Show EVIDENCE or shutup! :) OK.
It would explain EVERYTHING, dont yousee ?FEMA camps,collaps of economy and Bunkers...POLESHIFT .
With a small piece of brain you would see that. ''The Diseaster that are coming' , rember ?? this is it .. Planet X, up close and personal..

Andail, my brain is sad also.

For everyone else:

JUPITER WOULD NEED TO BE 93 TIMES MORE MASSIVE TO BECOME A STAR
- The smallest star found in the sky with nuclear fusion in the core is AB Doradus,, barely 93 times Jupiter's mass. Below ~80 Jupiter masses, stars do not form, and instead become brown dwarves. These technically aren't stars, so they are called 'failed stars'.

As for 'Youtube Dumbass', he's either a troll or completely backwards. Regardless which, I've gone against my every instict and left a comment.

Ponch · Sun 15/02/2009 19:29:27

The last thing this star system needs is another star. Our poor Van Allen belt couldn't take that kind of strain. Plus, night time is romantic and having two stars would mean no more night skies.

Besides, wasn't this the plot of an Arthur C Clarke novel?

The believers in the you tube thread make my head spin.

- Ponch

monkey0506 · Sun 15/02/2009 19:45:40

I refuse to believe anything that a channeled entity that uses a word like "bodacious" says. Besides, 14 October 2008 much?

Snarky · Sun 15/02/2009 19:49:17

This must be a joke all around, mustn't it? I mean, Jupiter is visible with the naked eye. I think we would notice if it became a sun.

Yeah, Jupiter was ignited (artificially) in 2010, the sequel to 2001 (both in the book and movie, I seem to remember). The trick was to compress it (by absorbing it into monoliths) so that its heat and density became greater. Even if that was practical, I doubt that it would work.

Vince Twelve · Sun 15/02/2009 20:18:10

If Jupiter defied the laws of physics and ignited into a star, no amount of ninjas at NASA could cover it up. Millions of astronomers pro and amateur are checking out the sky around the clock. When our technology has us studying and discovering planets and celestial events in other galaxies, having a second sun in our own solar system and not knowing about it would be like having President Obama move into your spare bedroom and you not noticing.

DanielH · Sun 15/02/2009 23:59:35

Don't be such a fool VinceTwelve.

Jupiter isn't visible to the naked eye, that's Charon, Pluto's moon, which was moved artificially and painted by NASA to simulate Jupiter after the entire Earth and the Moon was moved to roughly 0.1AU from the REAL Jupiter.
That way, when Jupiter ignited in 1945 it would look like The Sun, and the actual Sun was moved to a distant solar system where no-one would miss it (It eventually exploded into a black hole and became the center of the Milky Way in 1978), and the rest of the planets were moved accordingly so it would look like nothing had changed.
The government did all this so they could use Mars (which remained in it's original place where the 'old' solar system was) to fake the moon landings in 1967 (time was fast-forwarded by space beings so we thought it was 1969), as the actual Moon landings are impossible due to the moon being over nine thousand lightyears away (but it's really big so it looks closer.).
Planet X, (which is actually Earth's twin flung farther away from us by a gravity whip created by Area 51's underground test on a micro-black hole in 1888) became the new mars. after being painted red, of course! All of this interplanetary movement created a rift in space-time which weaked the structure of the twin towers so the government demolished them and blamed the middle east.
While moving the planets we disturbed an ancient species, (who are actually the creators of the humans) the last of which died in 1945 at roswell. Just before their extiction, they travelled back in time to 1912 and crashed one of their ships into one of ours- the Titanic, (which as we all know wasn't really the titanic but a fake 'sister' ship to it that was going to be intentionally sunk to claim insurance, before the alien ship sunk it)

For more info, compare the False Solar system: HERE

With the TRUTH: HERE

SPREAD THE TRUTH

Haddas · Mon 16/02/2009 00:52:51

Quote from: DanielH on Sun 15/02/2009 23:59:35
Don't be such a fool VinceTwelve.

Jupiter isn't visible to the naked eye, that's Charon, Pluto's moon, which was moved artificially and painted by NASA to simulate Jupiter after the entire Earth and the Moon was moved to roughly 0.1AU from the REAL Jupiter.
That way, when Jupiter ignited in 1945 it would look like The Sun, and the actual Sun was moved to a distant solar system where no-one would miss it (It eventually exploded into a black hole and became the center of the Milky Way in 1978), and the rest of the planets were moved accordingly so it would look like nothing had changed.
The government did all this so they could use Mars (which remained in it's original place where the 'old' solar system was) to fake the moon landings in 1967 (time was fast-forwarded by space beings so we thought it was 1969), as the actual Moon landings are impossible due to the moon being over nine thousand lightyears away (but it's really big so it looks closer.).
Planet X, (which is actually Earth's twin flung farther away from us by a gravity whip created by Area 51's underground test on a micro-black hole in 1888) became the new mars. after being painted red, of course! All of this interplanetary movement created a rift in space-time which weaked the structure of the twin towers so the government demolished them and blamed the middle east.
While moving the planets we disturbed an ancient species, (who are actually the creators of the humans) the last of which died in 1945 at roswell. Just before their extiction, they travelled back in time to 1912 and crashed one of their ships into one of ours- the Titanic, (which as we all know wasn't really the titanic but a fake 'sister' ship to it that was going to be intentionally sunk to claim insurance, before the alien ship sunk it)

For more info, compare the False Solar system: HERE

With the TRUTH: HERE

SPREAD THE TRUTH

That's total bullshit. Mars isn't red. It's brown!

DanielH · Mon 16/02/2009 01:16:08

We only think it's brown because the CIA puts a chemical in our tapwater which makes everyone a little colourblind- It's really red.

Okay, damn, I just re-watched the youtube video, and realized my rubbish I came up with earlier is just about as pheasible. Come on, folks- this is BS. Kudos on song choice though.

LUniqueDan · Mon 16/02/2009 01:52:15

Hey Welcome Back NiteFable!

DanielH : What are you talking about? This is crazy. Earth is Flat and standing on the back of a giant Turttle. Anyway, it's not the CIA who messed with the purity of our body fluids, it's the Commies.

Ghost · Mon 16/02/2009 03:27:20

Quote from: DanielH on Sun 15/02/2009 23:59:35
With the TRUTH: HERE

You almost got it right, but it was the Russians who painted Mars red, and you shifty Americans just painted the "Coca Cola" over it.

(actual photo)

Dualnames · Mon 16/02/2009 11:14:21

You just come back to post a link, shame on you

. Welcome back, I've just realized I'm guessing the future. I was like yesterday saying, hey where has nightfable gone to (a thought I did for the first time yesterday), and blip you post about a jupiter and lens flare and whatever.

Shane 'ProgZmax' Stevens · Mon 16/02/2009 14:07:05

I believe Jupiter is around 1100 Earths in diameter but only about 300 Earths in mass. Now that may seem impressive (and it is), but Jupiter just lacks the bulk to be a sustainable star. Of course, if it did happen astronomers and physics experts would be redefining what they know about planetary bodies, so for discoveries' sake I'll say it's not impossible.

It just goes against what we currently know about gas giants and star formation.

Also, as Snarky pointed out, Jupiter is typically clearly visible in the early morning when the sun is just coming up or just as the sun is going down, and it's not like we wouldn't see a new point light source shining in the sky. Some people will just buy anything without a shred of personal or practical evidence.