AGS: The Comic #2

[Mozesh]

Whaha that one was halarious, oh wait...it wasn't.
If you would like to start your own webcomic, please atleast make the graphics yourself and try to add humor that most people like/understand.

[Al_Ninio]

Garfield was funny?

[Nacho]

Yes. It still is.

[Squinky]

You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. There's nothing wrong with the comic, I actaully think it's quite good considering Blake's Mental Disability.

[LGM]

Yea.. Would you tell a kid with Downs Syndrome his finger paintings suck?

[Mr Flibble]

Depends. How bad are they?   

[rharpe]

Garfield was funny?

Sorry... In comparison to this comic... anything is.

[loominous]

This forum is degenerating.

Blake, I hope you ignore their loutish behaviour and stop posting threads for a while.

I think this section desperately needs some new approach to tackle unwanted posters because this is embarrasing and sadistic.

[PsychicHeart]

I was confused by the limit of two characters per panel, even if there was a group of higher numbers than that. They'd sort of...disappear and cycle round, it was quite confusing.

yeh, unfortunately the program used to make it only allows two characters per panel.

[LGM]

I'm sorry. I shouldn't be one to maliciously attack another. But come on we've given this boy enough warnings, he just doesn't listen.

[Evil]

When Loominous posts outside of the Critics Lounge, you know there's a problem.

[Nacho]

Hehe... I have my opinion divided.

Loominous is right, and the rule "If a post is silly, don't reply" has been followed quite successfully for a time.

I like that rule... So nobody pretends to be a moderator and people who posts threads with no interest at all receives the message.

But LGM is right too. This guy is flooding the Gen Gen with threads with no sense at all, and people are using this as a escape valve. If it has been the first time, the second, or the third, people should have tried to be moderated, but it's obvious that this does not work. This is like educating a kid. If he fails four subjects you might follow dr. Spock's book, sit and talk with him seriously from man to man. You can do it the next year if he fails too... And the third.

But you'll probably send to hell dr. Spock's book and all your children psychology knowleadge if he fails again the next year, and you'll start shouting and blaspheming...

I see this like that. I think fluke is trying to post in the way most of the people think it should be done... This is an obstacle in his education, and maybe a step back, but it might be necessary to start the run again with more energy than before.

[Pumaman]

Is this thread interesting, helpful or funny?

I think not.