AGS for 64-bit

[Kweepa]

Bill Gates once said something to the effect of 56 MB of RAM being enough for anybody...or something like that.

Would you believe it was 640k? Bill wouldn't:
http://tafkac.org/celebrities/bill.gates/gates_memory.html

You can't reject change just because you don't necessarily fully understand it.

I presume Elliott is reticent to embrace DRM. Personally, I'm still on Win2k.

[Traveler]

I don't think I'll use Vista, either, for the integrated "rights management" spyware. I don't see a lot of need to upgrade (from XP) anyway, unless someone uses applications with huge memory requirements (which incidentally I do, sometimes  :-/  . But my feelings against DRM are a lot stronger than such needs.)

[Pumaman]

This is all pretty irrelevant anyway -- there's a 64-bit version of XP, and there's a 32-bit version of Vista.

Whether you upgrade to Vista or not has nothing to do with running a 64-bit PC.

[monkey0506]

When I said that I was talking about him saying that 64 bit was pointless and stupid.

[Elliott Hird]

I presume Elliott is reticent to embrace DRM. Personally, I'm still on Win2k.

I don't think I'll use Vista, either, for the integrated "rights management"

Same reasons. And it is to do with 64-bit, you can bet your bottom dollar Microsoft are gonna be pushing 64-bit in our faces when Vista's out. I'm still on Windows ME, and I'm going to switch to Linux as soon as I get a competent ISP that works with it.