Jeni, that makes no sense at all. That person as an assassin is so off base that it can be said that he was chosen for one reason: so people would play again and again. As I said, a cut scene shows that it can't be they. Would an assassin demand that he be revealed.
Additionally, the note is not evidence of anything. Let's look: the note says you predicted so let us come together. Who is this person to make diplomacy? When was he told and why? Who is he to be told of a prophecy?
I really have to laugh? I'm sorry.
I must come to the conclusion that the authors decided on this assassin so as to make us play and play. This makes sense. Why? Cause it took them a long, long while to create this game. So to make that long effort worthwhile, we have to take a long, long time to figure (more like try and try again) out the culprit.
The real assassins, I submit, are the authors. They who assassinate logic and their own pixel reality.
With more thought, an assassin would make sense. It doesn't here.
Not to say it's a bad game. It's a good one. It's just to say, somethings were poorly figured.