Well, reading through these posts has been a rollercoaster!
Firstly, let me reply to/comment on the previous posts:
Reply In Case You Are Telling The Truth: Well played! And, naw, you shouldn't have lynched yourself because what if I was the Murderer and had also been privy in my intro PM to the fact that Town players were called Civilians? This was an option I kind didn't mention on purpose yesterday and I'm kind of surprised no one else brought it up.
It didn't even occur to me that the murderer may have been privy to that info. Why would they? My own role info literally just stated my role and nothing else (other than Sinitrena saying that the game would start shortly), so why would the murderer get extra information? That's why, once you'd revealed your method, I was certain that you must have been telling the truth. In my mind, there's no way you'd have known that Sinitrena used the term "civilian" if you weren't one yourself.
If Stupot is the Seer then Riaise killed VW. She wouldn't have been able to kill Stupot as that would have revealed his Seer role and she would be the obvious lynch today. This would have been an auto-lose for her. She would have figured out, quite cleverly, that the only chance she stood was to keep the Seer role in doubt and claim it for herself ASAP in this day phase and then it would be her word against Stupot's, giving her at least a 50/50 chance of a win.
Oh, and I realized that my logic of why Riaise wouldn't have killed the Seer also applies to Stupot so that was faulty thinking on my part.
Please keep this in mind. The logic is absolutely correct, you've just applied it the wrong way around in the first instance.
I thought for sure Riaise would kill me because if she believed Mandle's theory was correct then she'd know I'm the psychic.
You have contradicted yourself.
Yes, he has. So would you rather trust someone who has contradicted themselves and had to come up with an explanation later, or someone who has not contradicted themselves at all?
@Mandle. What I mean is that IF your theory was correct the Riaise would definitely be the killer so it would have been a waste to scan her as she would have killed me anyway (although it turned out she didn't). So I was playing with my idea that you were the murderer. If you were, there was still a chance you wouldn't have killed me and I would know whether or not you were the murderer.
So, if I was the murderer then I would definitely kill you, but if Mandle was the murderer then he probably wouldn't? What? Also, if the psychic is killed then their last scan is revealed anyway, so no scan is wasted. Surely this is something that the psychic should know?
And, as I know Riaise is much sneakier at these kind of things than Stupot (hopefully)...
You have vastly overestimated my sneakiness.
And lastly, let me just mention one more thing. After Mandle set his idea in motion, my first post was this:
Yeah, that's similar to what I was thinking. There could be both a psychic and a doctor, but I would think it's more likely that there's only one of them with so few players. So one murderer, one doctor or psychic, and three normals.
Not that it makes much difference at this stage. There's no way of knowing who to trust yet and I'm not about to go trusting just anyone. Not this time, anyway. 
Note how I try to distract from the psychic role by introducing the idea of there could be a doctor instead (very subtly, I admit). It's not much, but it was the best I could do to try and keep my role hidden for as long as possible. Now, here's Stu's post:
I'm also up for not lynching anyone this time.
I was actually wondering if none of us are the murderer, or even sinitrena herself, but that would be very devious. Good experiment though.
Vote to lynch: nobody.
He does exactly the same thing but trying to distance himself from the role of murderer.
So, yeah, I think that's all. If it hasn't convinced you, then I don't know what else I've got. All I can say for definite is that if I get lynched then we have lost the game.
