Quote from: Kastchey on Mon 03/03/2025 21:11:26One of the theme deciders here, chiming in to confirm the exclusion was entirely unintentional.Quote from: Danvzare on Mon 03/03/2025 18:14:45Shouldn't the theme be "LGBTQIA+"?I'm pretty sure there hasn't been any intentional exclusion, and the theme is meant to explore the general subject of gender and sexual diversity.![]()
It seem a bit wrong to leave out the Asexuals. (Especially since there's already a subsection of the LGBTQIA+ community who thinks that they shouldn't be included in the lineup.)
For what it's worth, I myself am asexual and aromantic. I very much consider asexuals and aromantics to be part of the community (and yes, I've seen exactly the sorts of arguments you meant, Danvzare) and I sincerely apologise for suggesting otherwise.
I admit I struggle with the vocabulary of LGBTQIA+ issues. My choice of words/acronym wasn't suitable. This is part of the reason I suggested to Emma that we link articles on gender and sexuality; the absolute last thing we wanted to do is dictate arbitrary lists of what is and isn't "acceptable"!
Again, I really do apologise and I hope this doesn't deter anyone from participating.