QuoteI've been thinking to program a simple brute force applet that fills 16x16 pixel canvas with all possible variations of all pixels of 54 colors of NES palette.
It's an interesting problem, but I would say that brute-forcing is itself not really intelligence, but application of the work of past intelligence. When Google produces a translation from English to Japanese, it doesn't actually know Japanese, but rather aggregates billions of human intelligences translating billions of English sentences to Japanese, and finds statistical patterns in the translations.
When it comes to art, the problem is knowing what "looks right" and what doesn't. Google can process billions of images of faces and then look at an image and analyze the probability that there is a face there. It will even detect the Mona Lisa, if shown it. But this requires a human to tell the machine what to look for, which makes it not an artist but just a search function. This is a version of Jorge Luis Borges' Library of Babel problem. The Library of Babel contains all 410 page books possible, including books containing complete gibberish. Somewhere in the library of babel is Moby Dick, The Bible, predictions of the future, undiscovered scientific theories. But the vast, vast majority are utter nonsense. Because of this, the entire library is utterly useless to its librarians, who become suicidal with despair.
Put simply, having all of the books, or art, or 54-pixel sprites possible is useless without knowing which sprite is the right one. And if you know which sprite is the right one, it's a waste of time to search through all possible sprites.