Wow, we all kinda took that theme and ran in four different directions. That's what I love about this comp!
@Sinitrena
@brushfe
@Mandle
@Sinitrena
Spoiler
I liked it! It was moody and thought-provoking. The half-twist (slide?) at the end was fantastic! Slight grammatical lapse with "were it tears in his eyes?" - I point this out because I've noticed similar conjugation quirks like this in your writing before, and it's a distraction from what is otherwise very good writing. There is a rare circumstance where you could pair it + were (conditional tense i.e. "were it not for him"), but in general you should always use "was" when "it" is involved. So, even though "tears" is plural ("tears were in his eyes" is correct), when you construct the sentence around the subject "it" the sentence should read "was it tears in his eyes?" (I personally would prefer "were those tears in his eyes?", but then we're getting into stylistic arguments
). Getting back on track, this story punched hard for me because I have exactly two kids myself (no plans to run out on them, but it would be horrible if they were cut out of my life for forty years). So top marks for insight into the human condition, pulling on my emotional strings, and twisting the script at the end.

[close]
@brushfe
Spoiler
I'm sure somebody will bring it up (
), but we've had lengthy debates in the past about contest administrants submitting their work. One school of thought says it's biased, because they already know what the topic is ahead of time, and another school of thought says more stories makes the competition more interesting, so what's the harm? The unofficial compromise has been that contest administrators can post stories but then declare that it's not a "real" entry and therefore can't be voted for. You're new, you didn't know, and since I was in the second school of thought it doesn't really bother me, but to keep the peace I automatically discounted voting for you.
Having said that, your story was like a wormhole into my mind. Whichever lane of traffic I pick, the other always seems to be doing better (or maybe only as well?). Maybe it's a Canadian thing, being such a car-centric culture but also having such horrendous traffic in the major cities. Either way, you have me questioning that my suffering is pre-ordained and that the only way out of this Sisyphean purgatory is to just stay home and avoid lines/traffic/people altogether.
Of course there's always driving into a concrete wall to prove a point, but that seems an escalation too far IMO.


Having said that, your story was like a wormhole into my mind. Whichever lane of traffic I pick, the other always seems to be doing better (or maybe only as well?). Maybe it's a Canadian thing, being such a car-centric culture but also having such horrendous traffic in the major cities. Either way, you have me questioning that my suffering is pre-ordained and that the only way out of this Sisyphean purgatory is to just stay home and avoid lines/traffic/people altogether.

[close]
@Mandle
Spoiler
At first I was a little put off by the rambling tone of your story, until I realized that it's exactly how I would scribble a note on the fly (pen pals, anyone?
). I'm always a sucker for sci-fi (know your market, I suppose), and I was fascinated with how the inconsequential super-power turned out to be consequential indeed. I'm making some jumps of inferencing here, because it's not overtly stated, but I'm assuming [Joe] was able to see the future of his own demise because of the ridiculously inconsequential trial ahead of time? You got my vote for cool concept, strong narrative technique, and hilarious twist at the end. Good work!

[close]