Adventure Game Studio

Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: Andail on Sun 29/03/2009 20:11:13

Title: An eye for an eye
Post by: Andail on Sun 29/03/2009 20:11:13
This very literal application of Islamic law is soon to be carried out in Iran.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/12/14/iran.acid.justice/

It wasn't in Swedish newspaper until recently, and I was shocked enough to post it here.

In some islamic countries it's common that envious or indignated men pour acid in the faces of women to render them outcast. It seems one woman is soon to get even.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Nikolas on Sun 29/03/2009 22:02:26
wow!  :o Speechless for the moment...
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: MillsJROSS on Sun 29/03/2009 22:18:20
What an eye opener...

-MillsJROSS
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: on Sun 29/03/2009 22:22:42
Gross. Grimly satisfying, in a way, but still.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: on Sun 29/03/2009 23:07:26
Sad news.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: RickJ on Mon 30/03/2009 03:09:55
Quote
It wasn't in Swedish newspaper until recently, and I was shocked enough to post it here...

What an eye opener...
Are you people from Mars or something?    I find it hard to believe that anyone in the civilized world doesn't know that this kind of thing is a normal occurrence in  most "so called" Muslim countries.     

Where was the outrage when...

- A young girl in Iran was rapped and recieves 100 lashes for having sex (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4295111.stm)

-  Iranian Girl is Sentenced to Death for Refusing to be Raped  (http://www.spike.com/video/iranian-girl-is/2814290)

- Atefah Sahaaleh hangged for being rapped by 51 year old ex-revelotionary guard (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateqeh_Rajabi)

- Iranian 11-year old girl raped and killed, seven years later parents still seeking justice ... (http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/1619)

- Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi was savagely beaten, tortured and raped while in Iranian custody  (http://www.iranfocus.com/en/index.php?option=com_contentask=view&id=1770)

- Pan-European Arab Muslim Gang Rape Epidemic (http://www.iris.org.il/blog/archives/757-Pan-European-Arab-Muslim-Gang-Rape-Epidemic.html)

- Qatif girl rape case (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatif_girl_rape_case)

- "Progressive" Arab lawyer calls Arabs to rape Jewish girls (http://boards.history.com/topic/Middle-East/Quotprogressivequot-Arab-Lawyer/520022314)

- Death Of A Princess (http://qatardiary.blogspot.com/2005/08/death-of-princess.html)

- Girl gets a year in jail, 100 lashes for adultery (beingngang raped)  (http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?contentID=2009020828735&method=home.regcon)

- Mother Jailed In Dubai For (falsely being accused by ex-husband of ) Adultery Loses Custody Of Sons (http://lavrai.com/blogs/2009/03/25/mother-jailed-in-dubai-for-adultery-loses-custody-of-sons/)

- Examples of convictions under Sharia law (http://www.religioustolerance.org/isl_adul1.htm)

- Iranian Women and Girls - Victims of Exploitation and Violence (http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/mhviran)

- Honor killings: When the ancient and the modern collide (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/01/23/cstillwell.DTL)

- Thousands of Women Killed for Family "Honor" (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/02/0212_020212_honorkilling.html)
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: rbaleksandar on Mon 30/03/2009 06:35:01
  I say, pretty awesome laws. Yes, it's true that they are totally different culture (I have a couple of Arabian friends so I know ;)), but once in Europe there were such laws too. For stealing - cut off his arm, for lying and slander that brougth misery to someone - cut off his toungue. I like especially the law applied to an architecture whose house had collapsed and killed its owner - cut off his head. About the raping thins - well, that bad really.

  You can't judge a whole "culture" so to say. It's really a very VERY different world. What we think is brutal and inhuman, they think is proper. What about all the sex, drugs and alchoholism in Europe? Is that normal? I think not. :-\
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: on Mon 30/03/2009 07:51:11
Quote from: rbaleksandar on Mon 30/03/2009 06:35:01
  You can't judge a whole "culture" so to say. It's really a very VERY different world. What we think is brutal and inhuman, they think is proper. What about all the sex, drugs and alchoholism in Europe? Is that normal? I think not. :-\

I do judge: this sentence, the same idea of violence as a retribution make the law I'm used to better, way better, than the one that judge in Iran applied.

It is brutal and inhuman, and the mere fact that our ancestors had the same attitude towards criminals a couple of centuries ago doesn't make it less brutal or less inhuman.

bicilotti over and out.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Andail on Mon 30/03/2009 08:04:45
Quote from: RickJ on Mon 30/03/2009 03:09:55
Are you people from Mars or something?    I find it hard to believe that anyone in the civilized world doesn't know that this kind of thing is a normal occurrence in  most "so called" Muslim countries.     

Rick, the occurence I'm referring to is the legally sanctioned revenge, which is pretty much a new thing.
My (ex) life partner since 3 years is from Iran, so I don't need to be lectured on what's going on in that part of the world. I can assure you that I've been outraged plenty of times because of the examples you brought up, and they are not new to me.

Systematic abuse and oppression of women is an everyday thing, but this is the first time I hear about a woman who will be allowed to take revenge on her attacker.

And the thought of having the perpetrator strapped down and receive acid in his face, in a controlled manner, is a pretty shocking image. Not that there isn't an animal part of me that finds satisfaction in this morbid way of carrying out justice.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: paolo on Mon 30/03/2009 11:13:43
Quote from: Andail on Mon 30/03/2009 08:04:45
And the thought of having the perpetrator strapped down and receive acid in his face, in a controlled manner, is a pretty shocking image. Not that there isn't an animal part of me that finds satisfaction in this morbid way of carrying out justice.

Isn't this what this amounts to in the end? Revenge rather than justice? It may make the victim (of the original crime) and his family feel better, but what benefit is there to society? It can't be said that it acts as a deterrent either, because crime seems to be as widespread in the countries with this system of justice as in any other country.

By the way, modern theologians interpret "an eye for an eye" as "let the punishment fit the crime" rather than "let the criminal suffer what he inflicted on his victims", although in a twisted kind of way, it looks like the former interpretation is the one being used here.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: InCreator on Mon 30/03/2009 11:21:32
Sun must be really warm down there.

But there are crimes that require death penalty, I think.

Like serial rapists, kid abusers, etc monsters. Not free housing on taxpayer money.
Europe is being a wuss, as always, with DP banned in most countries, including mine.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: SSH on Mon 30/03/2009 11:31:01
Um, strictly speaking, I don't think "an eye for an eye" is literally part of Islamic law as its a quote from Exodus. There is Qisas is Islam, but that doesn't say explicitly "an eye for an eye". Pedantic, I know, but it makes the OP phrase of "literal" inaccurate. Of course "very literal" is not really good either since something's either literal or not... ;)
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Andail on Mon 30/03/2009 11:35:14
Quote from: SSH on Mon 30/03/2009 11:31:01
Um, strictly speaking, I don't think "an eye for an eye" is literally part of Islamic law as its a quote from Exodus. There is Qisas is Islam, but that doesn't say explicitly "an eye for an eye". Pedantic, I know, but it makes the OP phrase of "literal" inaccurate. Of course "very literal" is not really good either since something's either literal or not... ;)

Yes yes, and "it's" is spelled with an apostrophe.

Pedantry aside, I'd like to emphasise that I'm officially against this kind of punishments, as well as death penalty, even though I'm ready to admit a sense of satisfaction. Simply because the message has thus far been that abusing and disfiguring women is an accepted way of punishing them for disrespecting men, in ever so trivial ways, and now there's finally an example being made that it's not okay.

But in general, revenge-based punishments are totally backwards and belong to the middle ages.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Shane 'ProgZmax' Stevens on Mon 30/03/2009 11:47:12
QuoteNot that there isn't an animal part of me that finds satisfaction in this morbid way of carrying out justice.

As barbaric as it may sound, the woman is probably getting the closest thing to true justice her country affords, which is surprising to me more than it is shocking since she is a woman.  Also, I'm not exactly sure the Western World has such a great handle on crime, anyway, with prisons overfull with everything from violent rapists/gang members to tax evaders.  I doubt the jails in Iran are ever full!
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: rbaleksandar on Mon 30/03/2009 12:41:08
Quote from: bicilotti on Mon 30/03/2009 07:51:11
I do judge: this sentence, the same idea of violence as a retribution make the law I'm used to better, way better, than the one that judge in Iran applied.

It is brutal and inhuman, and the mere fact that our ancestors had the same attitude towards criminals a couple of centuries ago doesn't make it less brutal or less inhuman.

bicilotti over and out.

  It is for you, but not for them. Do you have any idea what the life in the Arabian (Muslim) world is? I think not. Attitude towards women, way to punish people etc.
 
  Example: your wife sleeps with another man (not you). The normal punishment is to beat the wife not the man.
I asked a friend of mine (who's from Lebanon): "Why? By us it's 'forbidden' to do that."
And he told me: "Well, we usually don't beat our women too. Only when they deserve it."
Of course as a reply I asked: "What do you mean 'deserve'?"
  "Well, if for exampl your wife cheats on you she defies the family honour etc. If you beat the lover (the man who she has slept with), she will do it again because she wasn't punished for what she has done. That's why you beat the wife not her lover. Then she will know what will happen next time."
  Yes, it might sound barbaric (I've never hit a woman and won't unless my life depends on it) BUT think about that: when the child is naughty and does something wrong you don't punish the thing the child has done (e.g. broke a toy -> beat the toy) - you slap the child.

  And as ProgZmax said obviously our system isn't working! Yes, you put people in jail BUT you feed them and support them on your back for the rest of your life. Do you think that the food in prisons comes from the sky. Definitely not! It's all from the taxes you and I, and everyone pays. I sometimes think that it would have been better if the old laws and ways to punish the culprit. Once - centuries ago - such laws were applied in my country too. Then they stopped with all the bullsh*t about human rights etc. And now look what it is?! Crime everywhere.


  About the barbarity and inhumanity of the whole thing - all people are the same. Scare a bunch of tos*ers, make them run and scream and you'll see what animals the so called humans are. Humans are the most violent and agressive creatures on this planet.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: InCreator on Mon 30/03/2009 12:45:39
I don't find "not barbaric" even a considerable argument.

We are not some kind of higher beings with endless intelligence we often like to think we are. Not while we have horrible things... like for example - coal plants, nuclear weapons, child labor, human trafficking and capitalism.
Fact is, humans are savages, either towards each other, community or nature. Some less, some more. Very few are really what's considered good. But even human moral scale - the "good" - is relative to humans themselves. Good is what most powerful human says is good. The government, the law, the whatever. Don't like it? We'll punish you, don't worry.

And by this, long-agreed system and our (or atleast mine) humanly feelings, some of humans are savage enough to deserve their balls to be cut off.
No amount hippie moaning will change this.

EDIT: Didn't notice post just before mine. I Agree.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: RickJ on Mon 30/03/2009 14:02:27
Quote
Rick, the occurence I'm referring to is the legally sanctioned revenge, which is pretty much a new thing.
I don't think it's new at all.  Such punishments are common place in the Muslim world; bodily mutilation as punishment is nothing new to these people.   

I read the entire story and I didn't see revenge mentioned at all.  From the article there are the victim may choose one of three outcomes:

- Get married to her attacker
- Attacker pays a fine and goes free
- Attacker gets acid in the face

The victim stated that she doesn't want this idot stalking her for the rest of her life and that she wants justice.   What's new is the fact that  a male is actually going to be punished for committing violence against a woman.   

Quote
My (ex) life partner since 3 years is from Iran, so I don't need to be lectured on what's going on in that part of the world.
I apologize if I sounded like I am lecturing you.  However given the circumstance you describe, I don't quite understand how it is that you were unaware that bodily mutilation is a common form of punishment in the Muslim world.

Quote
"Well, if for exampl your wife cheats on you she defies the family honour etc. If you beat the lover (the man who she has slept with), she will do it again because she wasn't punished for what she has done. That's why you beat the wife not her lover. Then she will know what will happen next time."
What your friend neglected to tell you is that Islam considered to be inferior to men.  Consequently in most Muslim countries women have the legal status of property the same as livestock and are treated as such.   Your friend also neglected to tell you that the under the law in most Muslim countries the wife in his example can killed  with impunity for her deeds.   You friend also neglected to tell you that riding in a car with a male non-family member, simply leaving her home unescorted, or disobeying  the husband in some other way could be considered "cheating".   
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: rbaleksandar on Mon 30/03/2009 15:05:33
Quote from: RickJ on Mon 30/03/2009 14:02:27
What your friend neglected to tell you is that Islam considered to be inferior to men.  Consequently in most Muslim countries women have the legal status of property the same as livestock and are treated as such.   Your friend also neglected to tell you that the under the law in most Muslim countries the wife in his example can killed  with impunity for her deeds.   You friend also neglected to tell you that riding in a car with a male non-family member, simply leaving her home unescorted, or disobeying  the husband in some other way could be considered "cheating".   
I know that :) No need to tell. That's another things that one form the "civilized" world might consider as barbaric - to treat a person as property. ;)

btw In India is worse (about the women I mean) :)
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Nacho on Mon 30/03/2009 16:32:18
I think there are some "bad and horrible things", for example, someone goes walking down the street and kills someone else because he wanted to.

There are also "horrible but good things", for example, there is a life boat for 15 people, filled with 18, and the 18 that were already in didn't  allowed the rest of survivors to get it... Horrible, but better save 18 than nobody.

I think this is horrible. If good or bad is something I don' t want to discuss, I have my own opinion, but it' s just for me... What freaks me out a lot is that some people here doesn't seem to see the "this is horrible" as clear as I do...  :o
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: InCreator on Mon 30/03/2009 18:12:17
QuoteI know that Smiley No need to tell. That's another things that one form the "civilized" world might consider as barbaric - to treat a person as property. Wink

Isn't that what capitalism is all about?

Don't your thoughts, everything you can imagine or do - belong to your employer? Everything you own is held at bank, or even belong officially to bank (modern way of life - debts & leases)?

I'm a designer, doing creative work and feel it maybe stronger than people in service or other industries. Or who are capitalists themselves...
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Nacho on Mon 30/03/2009 18:42:25
Quote from: InCreator on Mon 30/03/2009 18:12:17
QuoteI know that Smiley No need to tell. That's another things that one form the "civilized" world might consider as barbaric - to treat a person as property. Wink

Isn't that what capitalism is all about?

Don't your thoughts, everything you can imagine or do - belong to your employer? Everything you own is held at bank, or even belong officially to bank (modern way of life - debts & leases)?

I'm a designer, doing creative work and feel it maybe stronger than people in service or other industries. Or who are capitalists themselves...


No. Capitalism is believing that Market takes better economycal decissions that a bunch of corrupted members of the party.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: rbaleksandar on Mon 30/03/2009 19:17:27
Quote from: Nacho on Mon 30/03/2009 16:32:18
...for example, someone goes walking down the street and kills someone else because he wanted to.
This is pure stupidity and inferiority complex. Like all those suicide-bombers. This has nothing to do with God or else. These are brainwashed people. And one get brainwashed when he's stupid. Killing is in most religions a sin (without a purpose I mean). So all this Jihad-thing is nothing but following the orders of a bunch of crazy dudes that don't play adventure games enough. :=
  I don't know if the woman was setisfied by wanting such sentence. Don't think she'll feel better after that.Her sight's gone.Nothing can change that.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: InCreator on Mon 30/03/2009 19:30:34
Ah, there you go again Nacho. Why are you so brainwashed?
I didn't talk about party members here, did I? And party members go with democracy, republic etc, not capitalism, which is absolutely different thing.

I was talking about collective census on forms of punishment/treating people like property and how we experience it every day.
While we all are more or less slaves of capitalist economy (some are even ignorant die-hard volunteers, like Nacho)
we all belong to something. To our country, our system, our employer, our regime and so on.

Yes, employer. While you have a deal with your employer and can leave him, employers have unwritten pact and other employer won't pay you much more than previous. That's why janitor or dishwasher cannot become a millionaire.

In capitalism, we experience this daily. Higher class earns daily what you earn monthly, your work earns him times more than he pays for it to you and so on. We mostly call it normal. Which is why I took this example.

Now imagine Islamic family. Man does work, earns & owns money. Wife takes care of kids and cooks. For this, man feeds her. How is man to his here so different from your everyday capitalist boss?
"to treat person as a property".
You are a damn property. And you have no problem with this. If you get fired, you might find another job.
But if all employers (capitalists!) decide to pay less wage to anyone of your profession, game over.

So I find "women abused there!" kind of hypocrite thing to say. I don't find acid throwing normal, but I don't see how it's so different with rest of us.
And with all that softness and fake tolerance around, I wonder why haven't anyone started throwing acid yet? There would be very little of response to this, due ages of voluntary slavery and being content with whatever rolls over you/whatever sick psychos run out there? Ooh, you threw acid into my face, let's lock you up in warm cell. But first, let's make sure some slick tries to defend you as well as possible, since we're so just & fair blah blah

And by default, we are human beings, which is also a responsibility.

Now, there's all kinds of scum that makes embarrassing to be a human. You (whoever) or me, law-abiding, moral and adjusted (to human ethics) humans are... somehow same species as that guy who took little girl away in his van and hacked her into pieces and buried them... are you okay with this? Seriously?

You really think that this only deserves a pat on the back?
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Nacho on Mon 30/03/2009 20:11:11
Rb, why do you comment that specific line? I was just giving an example of something "bad and horrible..." full stop. Nothing to discuss there... Your post means nothing to me, because you are not discussing what I said, sorry.

InC: Economy means "The way to decide how to assign limited resources". Capitalism does that by allowing the market to decide, in spite of allowing a central organization to do so. Liberal economy against directed economy.... (Directed by a party, if I am right...)

All the rest is "blablablablablabla..."
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: rbaleksandar on Mon 30/03/2009 21:41:52
Ok ;D
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: mkennedy on Tue 31/03/2009 17:27:07
It would be better if they could transplant the attackers eyes into his victim so that her sight is restored by sacrificing his, but that might not be possible due to rejection. While I consider myself a democrat I do support the death penalty for the most heinous of crimes and don't have a problem with "eye for eye". If McCain would have made pedophilia a capital crime though he would have gotten my vote if Obama was not willing to do the same.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Nacho on Tue 31/03/2009 19:06:13
One sec, molesting a minor is going to be punished with death in the US?
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Andail on Tue 31/03/2009 20:38:48
Let's sort out all the hypothetical ifs here.

Nacho, what mkennedy said was that if McCain had advocated death penalty for paedophilia, mkennedy would have voted for him, granted that Obama hadn't done the same.

However, McCain didn't support death penalty for paedophilia, and furthermore he didn't win the election, as Obama did, and Obama certainly isn't supporting death penalty for paedophilia.

So to answer your question, no, USA is not going to implement death penalty for paedophilia :)
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: arrr on Thu 02/04/2009 01:18:54
I think is all about beliving in God. If you belive in Him you will obey His laws. And he clearly stated that killing anybody is not permited.
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: MrColossal on Thu 02/04/2009 03:33:47
APRIL FOOLS
Title: Re: An eye for an eye
Post by: Andail on Thu 02/04/2009 13:16:59
That's our Eric, he fooled us all!