Sexual Medicine

Started by Emerald, Wed 20/02/2008 19:03:25

Previous topic - Next topic

Emerald

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7254523.stm

First of all, I'd really like to know what kind of scientist would hold that kind of experiment.
"Let's get 20 women into this lab, take ultrasounds of their love tunnels, and then make 'em all orgasm"
I mean, I didn't think anything like that actually happened outside of a porn studio...

Tuomas

Yeah, well, I've got a special spot on my penis that makes me "hapier" than the other part. Though pleasing a woman intrigues all of us in a way ;) I've been doing quite a lot of sexually oriented studies at silly forums around this country, and people seem to differ a lot, yet one thing that is interesting to all of us is our very anathomy, and others too. People like to compare, see.

GarageGothic

Um, they didn't MAKE them orgasm.  The article clearly states "the nine women who REPORTED being able to achieve vaginal orgasm". They simply chose
the two groups of test subjects based on whether or not the women previously had experienced g-spot orgasms.

The argumentation of the article seems quite flawed though. In one part it says that the tissue was "on average" thicker in the women who did achieve vaginal orgams, followed by the unambiguous quote that "it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has got a G spot or not".

Nine Toes

Quote from: Emerald on Wed 20/02/2008 19:03:25
I mean, I didn't think anything like that actually happened outside of a porn studio...

Honestly... porn should be so cool.  Porn is like, "shot from this disgusting angle, shot from that disgusting angle, she pees in his bellybutton, then she pretends to orgasm".  I've yet to see them use an ultra sound, or do anything remotely creative like that in porn.
Watch, I just killed this topic...

vict0r

I actually saw a shot in a porn flick from inside the love tunnel and it's really not pretty... I'm not sure how they did that though as the cam were pointing... "Outwards"... And you could see the dick go back and forth!

BOYD1981

if you're describing the same clip i've seen then it's not from an actual porn movie but a series that Channel 5 showed in the UK called A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex, and it just uses an internal camera, probably some kind of optical device like they use in keyhole surgery.

Limey Lizard, Waste Wizard!
01101101011000010110010001100101001000000111100101101111011101010010000001101100011011110110111101101011

Huw Dawson

Yes. Thank you for the mental scarring. :)

- Huw
Post created from the twisted mind of Huw Dawson.
Not suitible for under-3's due to small parts.
Contents may vary.

vict0r

Quote from: BOYD1981 on Wed 20/02/2008 20:05:39
if you're describing the same clip i've seen then it's not from an actual porn movie but a series that Channel 5 showed in the UK called A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex,

Okay, probably is the same clip! I've just seen the actual clip...

Emerald

Quote from: Huw "I'm scary" Dawson on Wed 20/02/2008 21:07:42
Yes. Thank you for the mental scarring. :)

- Huw

I agree. I'm starting to think this thread might be opening a pandora's box here...

LGM

Oh please, vaginas are lovely.
You. Me. Denny's.

Nine Toes


Heh heh.  He said pandora's box.
Watch, I just killed this topic...

vict0r

"Heh heh. More like pandora's snatch! Heh heh. Snatch."


Rui 'Trovatore' Pires

Going off-topic - strips like that are the reason I miss the Comic contest.

Helm's fill-in competition doubly so.
Reach for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.

Kneel. Now.

Never throw chicken at a Leprechaun.

Emerald


SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk