Adventure Game Studio

Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: R4L on Sat 10/03/2007 22:32:40

Title: Indiana Jones
Post by: R4L on Sat 10/03/2007 22:32:40
Today, I bought the Indiana Jones Collector's case, remastered for DVD, and I must say, these are possibly the best movies I have ever seen!

Being the age that I am, I didn't see these when they first came out, but now that I have, I just have to share it with everyone!  :)

However I was disappointed when I couldn't hear the voices, because I don't have 5.1 dolby surround sound, but im happy to have spent a good 30 bucks for 3 great movies!

Here's the one I bought (http://theindyexperience.com/image/indy_dvd_box1.jpg)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: ManicMatt on Sat 10/03/2007 22:35:55
Uh.. you can surely pass the sound through to your stereo speakers, or play it on your PC. You dont HAVE to have surround speakers to play it. Heck, insert headphones even!

Speaking of boxsets, I got BlackAdder complete collection for £34.99!  :D
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: esper on Sun 11/03/2007 00:01:05
You can't hear the voices? You're certainly doing something wrong. And while I must agree with you that the Indiana Jones films are true classics, they would be absolutely worthless without any voices...
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: BOYD1981 on Sun 11/03/2007 00:22:50
you need to make sure whatever you're using to play it (be it a dvd player or software) isn't set to use 5.1 stereo, there is probably an option on the DVDs in a Setup menu that allows you to choose the audio setup.
inserting headphones like matt suggested WON'T do any good as you'd still be trying to play 5.1 sound through stereo speakers.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Sun 11/03/2007 00:46:45
Goota agree with you on this one, great trilogy!! This and Back the the Future remain my favourite trilogies, and even moreso now that I've realised I love the slightly darker nature of the second film of both trilogies (same goes for Die Hard). I wish I'd seen the Indy trilogy at the cinema but I'm pretty sure I only saw Last Crusade.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: R4L on Sun 11/03/2007 02:16:03
Well I can hear voices, but they're very faint. I changed the sound settings on my TV but the voices are still hard to hear.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: GarageGothic on Sun 11/03/2007 02:24:50
The audio settings should be changed in the DVD player setup menu, as BOYD said, not on the TV.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: BOYD1981 on Sun 11/03/2007 04:01:03
well i actually meant any setup menu on the DVD itself, but yeh, check the DVD player too.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Nostradamus on Sun 11/03/2007 07:44:15
I have the same boxet (awesome btw) and I play the movies on a regular DVD hooked up to a regular Stereo TV and I have everything great.
Try to set up the audio on the DVD menu as the lowest setting but anyway it can't be that you can't hear the voices.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: ManicMatt on Sun 11/03/2007 08:43:10
Hmph, well on my dvd player, inserting headphones changes the sound mode to 2 channel stereo automatically, so there!  :P

Maybe it doesn't do that on other ones then.

But headphones was hardly a final method anyway.

Back to the Future is my favourate trilogy of ALL time!

I'm still not buying the second version of the boxset, those cash hungry bastards.  >:(
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Andail on Sun 11/03/2007 08:49:25
It tells something about Lucas' ability to write dialogue when his movies are equally appreciated without voices.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Redwall on Sun 11/03/2007 13:59:10
I'd consider Indy to be more Spielberg than Lucas (although obviously both had much to do with it).
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Sun 11/03/2007 14:04:41
I had heard a while back that they were going to make another film...Anyone know the status of that ?
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: GarageGothic on Sun 11/03/2007 14:20:04
Quote from: Andail on Sun 11/03/2007 08:49:25
It tells something about Lucas' ability to write dialogue when his movies are equally appreciated without voices.
Quote from: Redwall on Sun 11/03/2007 13:59:10I'd consider Indy to be more Spielberg than Lucas (although obviously both had much to do with it).

Interesting that both Raiders of the Lost Ark and Empire Strikes Back, arguably the best movies in the two series, were written mainly by Lawrence Kasdan, and that Lucas pretty much only wrote the stories for both trilogies. But of course he wrote the amazing ::) dialogue for the new Star Wars trilogy.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Lt. Smash on Sun 11/03/2007 17:12:28
QuoteI had heard a while back that they were going to make another film...Anyone know the status of that ?

Yes, it's true! They are making another Indy movie. On May 2008 Indiana Jones 4 will be in the cinema. Filming will begin in June 2007.
Casting:
Harrison Ford    Indiana Jones
Sean Connery   Henry Jones Sr.  not sure
Natalie Portman     not sure

and more

Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Redwall on Sun 11/03/2007 20:09:56
Indy 4 has been in development hell for years. Every year there's a new story that "filming will begin in ____ and it will be released in ____". I hope by now they just replace the dates and don't bother to write a whole new article for those non-stories.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Da_Elf on Sun 11/03/2007 20:18:12
ummm. not really. for years it was always "when george finishes star wars then they will look at doing indi4"
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Sun 11/03/2007 20:38:29
I'm pretty sure Indy4 was on the cards ever since Indy3. These things just don't go public so early. Same happens in our gameworld. Oh yes! But I can't say anymore :)

QuoteI'd consider Indy to be more Spielberg than Lucas

Definitely. I reckon Lucas said "yes" to a script, turned up to a couple of locations and that was it :P

Going back (to the future), I think this thread and the "ideas for nightmares" thread sparked up a strange dream for me last night. I dreamt I had my own time-travelling delorean. It's one of the longest dreams I've ever encountered, I was going all over the place, meeting lots of people. Then I got this feeling it was going to get nicked, so I went back to the car park I'd parked it in and true enough, someone had stolen it! But luckily like 2 seconds beforehand, so I saw them pull-off. In nightmare style I couldn't run, but they did some crazy manouvere which meant they had to go back on themselves. I ran up to the car and remembered I'd left the sunroof unlocked, so the robbers thought I'd go for the door and didn't get a chance to react when I actually jumped on the roof and hauled open the sun-roof.

This is the mad part. I jumped in through the sun roof head first, toward the lap of the fat robber man :P I awoke to find myself hurtling toward my bedroom floor. I had actually pounced in my sleep. That's never happened before!! Anyway, just thought you might give a shit ;)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: LGM on Sun 11/03/2007 23:13:51
You didn't jump,  I threw you off the bed. Don't take all the covers next time!
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Sun 11/03/2007 23:18:17
Damn, I knew I shouldn't have drunk so much!

Andail
AGA
LGM
TheVintageDemon

:p
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Andail on Mon 12/03/2007 14:16:40
Damn, Mods! I felt so special for a while there, and then you go ahead and post a list like that!!
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: ManicMatt on Mon 12/03/2007 21:33:41
I'm not on his list!  :'(
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: hedgefield on Mon 12/03/2007 21:46:01
Yep, I have the same boxset. Awesome movies, great set. Worth it alone for the Tom Selleck Indy audition video :P.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: R4L on Tue 13/03/2007 00:06:06
Lol.

I haven't watched the bonus features disc yet, but I did figure out how to fix the sound on my tele. Works fine now!  ;)

And remember,

"Dr. Jones!"

"MY professional name!"
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Sun 18/03/2007 16:37:51
Quote from: Lt. Smash on Sun 11/03/2007 17:12:28
QuoteI had heard a while back that they were going to make another film...Anyone know the status of that ?

Yes, it's true! They are making another Indy movie. On May 2008 Indiana Jones 4 will be in the cinema. Filming will begin in June 2007.
Casting:
Harrison Ford    Indiana Jones
Sean Connery   Henry Jones Sr.  not sure
Natalie Portman     not sure

and more



Indy's girl in number 4 is probably going to be  played by Cate Blanchett!
(http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20070317/117417318000.html)

Forget Natalie Portman..
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: GarageGothic on Sun 18/03/2007 17:15:14
Wasn't Portman supposed to play his daughter? I never thought they meant for her to be the love interest of grandpa Ford but rather Marion's daughter or something.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Hammerite on Sun 18/03/2007 17:43:19
Quote from: Steel Drummer on Sun 18/03/2007 16:37:51
Forget Natalie Portman..
i dont really want to.  ;)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Sun 18/03/2007 17:52:57
D'oh! Portman would've been pretty cool :)

OT for a moment, but movie related - apparently the Pirates 3: At World's End trailer is out today, but I can't find it (only fan-made crappy poos on YouTube) -- does anyone know of a place to view it yet? IMDB used to be really good for trailers but it seems now they just link to external websites :(
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: GarageGothic on Sun 18/03/2007 18:02:38
Apparently it's a Yahoo exclusive or something, and doesn't come until tomorrow:
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/piratesofthecaribbeanatworldsend.html

Edit: The official site also has a countdown for tomorrow: http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/pirates/atworldsend/
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Sun 18/03/2007 22:20:03
Portman's not gonna be in it, GarageGothic; or else there'd be a lot of publicity surrounding the event. I guess Lucas is going to have to let go of his fantasies about her. ;)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: GarageGothic on Sun 18/03/2007 22:31:29
It seems that the rumor last July (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/23808) was indeed that Portman should play Indy and Marion's daughter. Somehow I'm glad that didn't pan out. Daughter or not, Karen Allen had better be in it though. As long as it doesn't also mean that Mrs. Spielberg will be making a reappearance and (almost) ruin yet another Indy movie.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Mon 19/03/2007 02:46:02
Portman just doesn't seem 'Indy' enough. She's not really sassy enough, or tough enough to be in Indiana Jones. I also read about a rumour that Shia LeBouf is signing on to play as Indy's son, but he denied it.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Kweepa on Tue 20/03/2007 13:50:12
Quote from: Steel Drummer on Mon 19/03/2007 02:46:02
She's not really sassy enough, or tough enough to be in Indiana Jones.
Really?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpnjUIWPyVo
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110413/


Indy having a son in the film sounds like a really bad idea. Is sentimentality what they were looking for in a script?
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Tue 20/03/2007 14:05:33
QuoteIndy having a son in the film sounds like a really bad idea

Are you serious? Will there be one? That's awful.

I also want to place a bet that Lucy McClane's role in Live Free & Die Hard is nothing short of being exactly the same as Arnie's daughter in True Lies.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Hammerite on Sun 25/03/2007 09:13:33
Quote from: Steel Drummer on Mon 19/03/2007 02:46:02
Portman just doesn't seem 'Indy' enough. She's not really sassy enough, or tough enough to be in Indiana Jones.
Don't spoil it.  :)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Sun 25/03/2007 16:15:16
And she's not that hot, either. ;)

Okay, maybe she's got the looks, but not the body. :=
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Blackthorne on Sun 25/03/2007 16:20:50
Quote from: SteveMcCrea on Tue 20/03/2007 13:50:12

Indy having a son in the film sounds like a really bad idea. Is sentimentality what they were looking for in a script?

It makes sense to me.  It's not like they're adding a little kid; they're talking about a full-grown, adult son.  It HAS been 26 years since "Raiders".

Bt
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Sun 25/03/2007 17:03:57
I wasn't talking about a little kid when I said son. Shia LeBouf is in his twenties, I believe.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Hammerite on Sun 25/03/2007 18:23:35
Quote from: Steel Drummer on Sun 25/03/2007 16:15:16
And she's not that hot, either. ;)

Okay, maybe she's got the looks, but not the body. :=
i dont think that you're fully in puberty yet so i'll let that go...
...
... this time.
:) :=
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Shane 'ProgZmax' Stevens on Sun 25/03/2007 19:06:28
QuoteIt makes sense to me.  It's not like they're adding a little kid; they're talking about a full-grown, adult son.  It HAS been 26 years since "Raiders".

I'm against it primarily because it's a marketing maneuver to try and keep an opportunity open for the franchise to continue, a trend with action hero films I'd like stopped before it starts.  It would be like them making another Die Hard with just McClane's son after the upcoming one.

Who the hell would care to see it?  I wouldn't.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Sun 25/03/2007 19:21:03
I agree. The whole resorting to heros children says to me their plot devices are weak and thats the only way they think they can be salvaged.

Also, 26 years, sure, but uh, I thought the whole point of Indy was for it's early 1940's style. Are they putting Indiana in the 70's now or something? Eek :/ Like the son debate that too sounds like cashing in on crap. But I doubt they will.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Andail on Sun 25/03/2007 19:40:08
I demand an "Indy in the 70's" photoshop phriday!
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Miez on Mon 26/03/2007 00:23:42
Quote from: Mods on Sun 25/03/2007 19:21:03
Also, 26 years, sure, but uh, I thought the whole point of Indy was for it's early 1940's style.

I thought it was going to be early fifties? Post war?
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Afflict on Mon 26/03/2007 00:40:14
I leave Indy to Spielberg. He has done a great job on the other thus far, I can't wait for the sequel.

And regarding Natalie Portman... Oh yeah, she got the body the looks and the attitude imo.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Mon 26/03/2007 00:45:35
Quote from: Mods on Sun 25/03/2007 19:21:03
I agree. The whole resorting to heros children says to me their plot devices are weak and thats the only way they think they can be salvaged.

Also, 26 years, sure, but uh, I thought the whole point of Indy was for it's early 1940's style. Are they putting Indiana in the 70's now or something? Eek :/ Like the son debate that too sounds like cashing in on crap. But I doubt they will.
Well... Indy did Marion in Raiders (the scene in the ship), that was in 1939, if his son is 20 something in this movie, then it would be late 50s, early 60s. The "Indy's son" thing isn't even a near possibility.

Quote from: Hammerite
Don't spoil it. 
The only reason I wouldn't want Portman to be in it is because she's way too young for Indy. Of course, she could be his daughter, but I think adding anyone else into the Jones family would ruin it. In my opinion, they should just leave the Indy series as it is without making any more films. Lucas is getting stale. He used to be good, before the 90s, but when the prequel trilogy of Star Wars came out he almost ruined the series (okay, Episode 3 was good, but that's about it) and he's probably going to ruin this series too by releasing separate box sets for each film with 10 seconds of extra footage added to the movie, and a rehash of the documentaries that were on the first Indy box set. What's more, the Indy films had a really nostalgic quality to them- this time around, Lucas is probably going to insist on using digital film for Indy 4 (like he did with Star Wars episodes 2 and 3). Or, if he doesn't do that, he'll force them to shoot the entire movie in his surreal blue screen world. Even if he uses regular cameras to shoot it, I doubt that Spielberg, Lucas, or anyone will ever be able to top the original films. 


Quote from: Afflict
And regarding Natalie Portman... Oh yeah, she got the body the looks and the attitude imo.

Well... I've seen teenage girls with better bods.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Hammerite on Mon 26/03/2007 16:34:16
QuoteWell... I've seen teenage girls with better bods.
I KNOW some teenage girls who look better  :) but y'know, she's still pretty damn hot.  ;)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Redwall on Tue 27/03/2007 04:01:37
Is her "hotness" really relevant to whether she'd be good in such a movie?
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Tue 27/03/2007 05:26:28
First rule of Indy films: the girl's gotta be hot. ;)
No seriously, you've got a point. She was a decent actress in George Lucas' other 'masterpiece'. Better to use her than Hayden Christensen (more so, if he's playing Indy's son).
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Shane 'ProgZmax' Stevens on Tue 27/03/2007 08:45:28
This is all moot anyway because Lucas keeps rejecting Darabont's script as of last month anyway.  And he actually said in an interview the movie would be a 'character study'.  Who wants to see Indy sitting in a chair talking about Marion, Billy, and Elsa while sipping tea with his dad?  Maybe they'll do flashbacks to the tv series just to be extra dumb!
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Andail on Tue 27/03/2007 09:13:19
These parent-child relations are never very realistic anyway. Sean Connery played Indy's father, and he's only some ten years older than Harrison Ford.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Nacho on Tue 27/03/2007 11:23:34
Quote from: Andail on Tue 27/03/2007 09:13:19
These parent-child relations are never very realistic anyway. Sean Connery played Indy's father, and he's only some ten years older than Harrison Ford.

And now they seem to have the same age... Poor Harrison... That Calista is evil...  :-\
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Hammerite on Tue 27/03/2007 16:38:04
Quote from: Steel Drummer on Tue 27/03/2007 05:26:28
First rule of Indy films: the girl's gotta be hot. ;)
No seriously, you've got a point. She was a decent actress in George Lucas' other 'masterpiece'. Better to use her than Hayden Christensen (more so, if he's playing Indy's son).

what about the girl in the second one, she was both annoying and nothing particularly special.
looks and personality were both awful.
i'd rather have had a relationship with the short kid.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Tue 27/03/2007 16:45:10
A good family guy quote springs to mind; Lady only in movie cos she humping director... ;)
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Tue 27/03/2007 16:56:07
Regarding the character study thing: the third Indy film was sort of a character study; maybe this one is going to be too.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Redwall on Wed 28/03/2007 01:03:16
Quote from: ProgZmax on Tue 27/03/2007 08:45:28And he actually said in an interview the movie would be a 'character study'. Who wants to see Indy sitting in a chair talking about Marion, Billy, and Elsa while sipping tea with his dad?

I'm actually agreeing with the Drummer here. How does "character study" = "Indy sitting in chair sipping in tea"? I realize Indy isn't exactly high-brow entertainment, but that doesn't mean we should run away at the first mention of characterization.
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Sat 14/04/2007 02:43:45
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070413/ap_en_ot/people_shia_labeouf

This was just posted on Yahoo within the last few hours.. I wonder if it's true?
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Evil on Sat 14/04/2007 03:37:19
I can only hope LaBeouf's only line is "Hang on, Lady. We going fo a ride!"
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Wed 01/08/2007 21:28:15
Major update: Spielberg and crew had a live video shown at ComicCon San Diego, on the set of Indy 4 (well, in the back of the set behind a curtain, so you couldn't really see anything from the set), and the following people are definitely in the movie:

Harrison Ford--- Indiana Jones
Ray Winstone--- Sidekick with an undisclosed name
Shia LaBeouf :P--- another 'sidekick', used for comic relief (apparently)..
Karen Allen--- Marion Ravenwood

John Williams will return to make the soundtrack. The title is still unknown, (Spielberg said: "We're here on the set of Indiana Jones and the *cough cough cough*) but Lucasfilm plans to release a trailer later this year with the title in it.

More details here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Jones_4)!
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Wed 01/08/2007 21:34:33
As I've said before, with Williams making the music, I don't think this film can go wrong.

Still. Screw THAT Indy 4, and worry about THIS Indy 4;
[some other time ;)]
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: radiowaves on Wed 01/08/2007 22:59:29
Wow, that looked pretty good for low budget amateur movie!
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: Steel Drummer on Fri 03/08/2007 13:17:45
Huh?
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: on Tue 07/08/2007 20:08:29
Right yeah, here's the link again..had to change some stuff...directors request :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1bbOKQEY0c

also, Fate of Atlantis fans might like this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPWqbcbf0Lo
Title: Re: Indiana Jones
Post by: evenwolf on Tue 07/08/2007 20:15:14
Hahahaha.   The acting in that Fate of Atlantis film.     Sorry if those are your mates.



I actually really like the templars one & would watch it in its entirety.    I got to saw the shot for shot remake of Raiders.   THAT was impressive.