Adventure Game Studio

Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: rtf on Sat 11/09/2004 17:39:33

Title: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: rtf on Sat 11/09/2004 17:39:33
Disclaimer: I'll admit, I have no knowledge of IRC Bot Programming.

I have a suggestion for Roger.

Say that I wanted to find out if people were talking about me behind my back.

I envision something like this:

<rtf>Roger mentioned rtf
<Roger>rtf was last mentioned 3 days, 2 hours ago by CJ_ saying "If anyone deserves the nobel prize, it would have to be rtf"


Again, I don't know how you were to implement that, but I thought it was worth the suggestion (as you can see it's possibilities).

What do you think?
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: lawrenceofarabia on Sat 11/09/2004 17:50:45
They could just release the frogs, er... logs as text files.
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: Evil on Sat 11/09/2004 17:52:22
Yeah, the issue would be Roger would have to save all of the conversations and go back through them. Its probably possible, but it would be too much work for Roger.
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: Al_Ninio on Sat 11/09/2004 18:18:54
There is already an option for roger to tell you how many exclamation marks you have typed, so I assume making this option would not be problematic nor too much work for Roger.
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: evenwolf on Sat 11/09/2004 18:46:36
More like:Ã,  "roger gossip rtf"

But won't this just force people to come up with l33t spellings for names?


Like:Ã,  "Geeze, \/el won't shut up about his game."

or:     "I wish er|c wouldn't hit on me so much."

Roger would have to log every word on IRC, including all possible monickers.
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: Pumaman on Sat 11/09/2004 20:46:12
The only realistic way to do this would be to have a list of names that Rog was on the lookout for -- otherwise, it would involve him trawling back through logs to find the last reference.

Besides which, surely one of the benefits of IRC is that you can talk behind people's backs when they're not there :P
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: Al_Ninio on Sat 11/09/2004 20:52:04
The wonders of a private message, CJ :P
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: MrColossal on Sat 11/09/2004 23:31:28
Private messages? just wait till they leave the room
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: Evil on Sun 12/09/2004 00:59:24
Or just say it to their face.
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: MrColossal on Sun 12/09/2004 01:26:10
Yea...

/me waits till Evil leaves the room...
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: AGA on Sun 12/09/2004 17:49:46
The problem with this would be that Roger's logs are absolutely enormous, something like 1MB for each day he's online. So obviously searching through his logs every time someone asks him when they were last mentioned would take time and effort...
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: MillsJROSS on Sun 12/09/2004 23:47:07
Anyway, who cares what people say behind your back? It's what they say to your face that matters. And I don't think #ags should be turned into a high school drama...where people go around getting angry because of something someone said while they weren't there. Just except the fact that people may or may not talk about you when you're not there.

-MillsJROSS
Title: Re: Suggestion for #ags (roger)
Post by: rtf on Mon 13/09/2004 05:26:55
heh
Well, it seemed like a good idea at the time.
If I'd known how big roger's logs were....