Transition to .net 4 - request for AGS 3.4.0

Started by SpeechCenter, Tue 18/09/2012 15:13:44

Previous topic - Next topic

tzachs

I support this, especially if it's compatible with XP.

@Radiant, I don't think there's anything specifically needed by AGS, but it will make life a lot easier for developers, thus you'll get more productivity. Linq alone could probably have been used to reduce the amount of code by one fifth (wild and unsupported claim).

Crimson Wizard

Quote from: tzachs on Thu 02/01/2014 14:33:44Linq alone could probably have been used to reduce the amount of code by one fifth (wild and unsupported claim).
And reduce readability by half (wild and unsupported claim)(laugh):tongue:.

Radiant

Quote from: tzachs on Thu 02/01/2014 14:33:44
@Radiant, I don't think there's anything specifically needed by AGS, but it will make life a lot easier for developers, thus you'll get more productivity. Linq alone could probably have been used to reduce the amount of code by one fifth (wild and unsupported claim).
I'm sorry, but with a large change as this, I would really want to hear more concrete examples of what and how it makes easier for developers. For multi-person projects, I'm not a fan in general of migrating to a newer version of anything without a solid concrete reason. $.02

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk