Btw, this application worked fine, on my Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0.
Thanks for letting me use it :op~
Thanks for letting me use it :op~
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: pcj on Wed 11/04/2012 19:55:14
It's OK, I guess, not really catchy or anything. I don't really know the whole plot you have going either so I can't really gauge the appropriate-ness.
Quote from: pcj on Wed 11/04/2012 19:32:36
Wasn't "This Time It's Personal" the working title for (one of) the planned official SQ7? If so I would say you should definitely change it. I think something more spoofy like other SQ titles would probably fit better.
Quote from: pcj on Wed 11/04/2012 19:13:08
That's cool, I of course wish you the best of luck and will try to keep an open mind about you trying to claim SQ7 status in fandom
A few comments on the content now:
Roger looks a bit more muscular than he's usually depicted, is that intended or are you working on that still? He's generally seen as a lanky janitor.
How much of the game is revisiting old locations? All of the location renders shown are from existing SQ work - while that's probably somewhat easier for you, it's potentially less interesting for players. Some of the locations make sense, I guess - but it would be nice to have more variety.
Not a big fan of the logo - not very striking/exciting, etc, but you've got time to work on that.
Quote from: pcj on Wed 11/04/2012 13:19:22Quote from: ArmyMage on Tue 10/04/2012 14:45:11it has always been my dream to play a new sequel to the original series of Space Quest
You are aware of the two original fangames that just came out, right - VSB and Incinerations? Your basic plot sounds a little like VSB so I'm not sure...
Also I would kind of want to suggest you avoid calling it SQ7, but that's just my opinion from being around the block on SQ fangame naming.
By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies. Please visit this page to see exactly how we use these.
Page created in 0.040 seconds with 15 queries.