Quote from: Pumaman on Thu 07/07/2005 21:47:34
Something I find rather bizarre about today is that there has actually been less media coverage than when Diana died.
On that day in 1997, radio stations stopped playing pop music and just played sad tunes, TV was non-stop coverage of her death, people were openly crying in the streets, it was crazy.
Today, radio stations continued playing their normal music, TV has had some interruption for news coverage but not too much, and ordinary people continued to go about their daily business.
Yet which of the two events was more important: one person dying in a car crash, or several people being killed and injured by terrorist bombs? Completely bizarre.
tv coverage is exactly what the terrorists want, the more they get the more impact their acts have, it's also good for news stations because it means they get higher ratings and more money from their affiliates.
the best thing the media can do in a situation like this is to not just film panic and chaos that will scare us about what MIGHT happen instead of informing us about what HAS happened.
as for the religious side of it all and the whole "eye for an eye" argument and "ooh they've had it worse and it's just desserts" stuff i just want to say it's pathetic, i am a great believer in revenge but those people most definitely aren't taking revenge on the people repsonsible for their "suffering" over the years: the church and organised religious masses that all hate one another for no reason other than that their beliefs are a different version of the events that really happened from which religions were derived.
but apart from all that i hope that dave gilbert turns up safe.