I agree with Ryan Timothy, that it is intuitive to think of 3/5 as average. The bell-curve of games in the database is heavily skewed in that there are very few 4/5 and 5/5 games. Perhaps those categories should have been merged into a "really good" 4/4 or 5/5 category.... But it's all pointless to debate it now, since you'll never muster the enthusiasm to go back and re-rate the 900+ games already in the database. For consistency's sake we are more or less stuck with the status quo, so us game makers are just going to have to roll with the punches. If a game has been perceived to be slighted, recent evidence suggests that raising a ruckus will correct the problem -that's good enough for me.
I think a section where you could provide links to reviews in the games database is a wonderful idea, but it will have to be author driven. Any serious potential player would rely more on in-depth reviews than some ill-explained rating system when deciding whether or not to download, and the sorry fact of the matter is that the non-serious player is just going to judge the game on its screen-shot anyway.
I think a section where you could provide links to reviews in the games database is a wonderful idea, but it will have to be author driven. Any serious potential player would rely more on in-depth reviews than some ill-explained rating system when deciding whether or not to download, and the sorry fact of the matter is that the non-serious player is just going to judge the game on its screen-shot anyway.