Messages

You can also just make your own fonts.
It might seem hard, but it's actually quite easy. Just long winded.
There should be a few font editors here on the AGS forums. I remember using one called Radiant FontEdit, but I think the more commonly used one now is the WFN Font Editor.

Welcome to the forum Zwiffer.
The guy selling fine leather jackets is to your left. If you want to know more about Loom, ask the guy to your right. 

But in all seriousness, I look forward to seeing what you make. If you're going for a SCI0/SCI1 style, does that mean you're planning on using a text parser?

Did you record all the lines yourself? That's pretty insane! 

Pretty much yeah. Kind of.
My brother helped a little by recording nearly 200 lines for me. (He voices three characters. Mostly minor roles.)
But the other 9800 lines were done by me. 

I hope people don't mind my poor attempts at doing a female voice. 

[help]

With the help of artificial intelligence, it is indeed possible to create real masterpieces. You have to keep up with the times. And use everything to the maximum to achieve your goals.

With the help of genAI, then yes... it should indeed be possible to create a masterpiece.
The problem is, the people who are capable of making a masterpiece are the same people who would almost certainly never use genAI to aid their development process.

You ever notice how the best art, is always the stuff that's harder to make? A good example would be stop-motion vs CGI.
It's almost as though the more difficult it is to make something, the more effort people put into making it. 

Alice in Wonderland?

I've finally finished recording all of the voice lines! 

Now I just need to listen through all 10,000 of them, rerecord any lines I flubbed (or alter the ingame text to match the way I recorded the line), then quickly playthrough my game to make sure everything is working, and then send it over to my beta testers.



Not long now.

Looks great on light mode!  Any chance of a version with a transparent background for dark mode, please?  So the cup with white outline, but no blue background, just transparent instead.

How's this?

I gave it a try with convertio but the icon doesn't seem to fully work. It doesn't show up in list or details view in explorer but in the larger views. Here is the png, if anyone wants to give it a try:

Here you go:


It's got the sizes: 256, 128, 48, 32, and 16.
I made it using Gimp, although I did the resizing with IrfanView in order to use the Lanczos resampler, since I think it's the best resampler for retaining details.

Just a tiny cosmetic issue:

The favicon has a black background, as opposed to a transparent one:


Is this deliberate?

Presumably it's there to make the white outline visible.

Alternatively it'd have to look like this:


I'm not sure which looks better though. 

Might and Magic?

Congratulations to everyone who won.
And thank you for the incredible ceremony. 

Alice's Cottage?

I remember this being standard in the old 9-Verb template. You could literally just copy and paste it from there.

Don't forget this.
I find it funny how China is America's number 1 enemy, now that they're officially worse than China. 

And the proposed solution is pretty much just to give corporations exemption from following copyright laws... which if you think about it, is already the case (I mean honestly, how often does a little guy win a copyright case?). They clearly just want it in writing though, so everyone can get off their back about it.

Recently I've just been making my own fonts. It's a bit laborious, but it's quite easy to do. At least for the pixel-art fonts that I need.

But to better answer your question, I remember Zoo977 making quite a few fonts for AGS, which can be found here.

Shouldn't the theme be "LGBTQIA+"? 
It seem a bit wrong to leave out the Asexuals. (Especially since there's already a subsection of the LGBTQIA+ community who thinks that they shouldn't be included in the lineup.)

It kind of looks like Mr Game and Watch.

Thanks so much for all these thoughtful and detailed responses!   This is a really great discussion! 

@CaptainD I think the multi-layer hinting sounds really smart. In practice, though, that sounds really difficult to design without simply including a "hint system." Is this demonstrated in the newest Captain Disaster demo? Would love to see how you're implementing it.

Anyone else have thoughts about hints or hint systems and how to nudge struggling players without making it too easy for the pros? Do you have a favorite game that did this well?

I personally have three ways of doing hints.

• Firstly, if you try and combine two items that aren't supposed to be combined, you'll be given a hint as to what you should be combining those items with: "Nah, I'd rather cut up the pillow than draw on it."
• Secondly, if you look at the item, you'll get a hint as to what you should be doing with it: "Hmm, I've always wondered what was inside of a pillow."
• Thirdly, have characters basically be built-in hint systems, with their dialog options being literal hints: "Any idea of what I could do with this pillow?" "I don't know. Just don't destroy it like you did with your last one."

And of course, add more hints for more obscure or harder puzzles, and less hints for the easier and simpler puzzles. If it's a part of the game where the player has a choice to solve multiple puzzles (like the Three Pirate Trials), then you can usually get away with less hints, since if they get stuck, they can just go do something else until the hints they did find, finally clicks in their mind.
I like to think that the best part about this method, is that they won't be able to distinguish the hints from the red-herrings and meaningless blabber. So the hints are likely to just sit at the back of their mind, until they suddenly recall it, thinking that they've come to that conclusion on their own. (In other words, planting the idea of the solution in their head, so they think it's their solution and not yours.)

The oldest version I personally think you should even consider aiming for, is 3.4.3, since it's the last version to work on Windows XP. And there's still people out there that use Windows XP, so if you've got that version covered, you've pretty much made it compatible for the vast majority of people who refuse to upgrade their software.

Any older than that, and you're targeting an audience that either doesn't exist or doesn't care.

But that isn't to say that you SHOULD target 3.4.3. Because like Snarky said, that pretty much only covers a small niche audience.
Personally, I think Crimson Wizard is probably right about targeting 3.6.0.
Besides, it'll make it easier for you if you aren't having to keep support for old versions in mind when writing your code.

That all being said, if you can easily add support for an older version. Why not do it.