Messages

If the ability to post is still there, people will ignore the warning and post their message regardless how big, red, bold, and/or threatening the warning is.

Coming from [a lot of] experience in moderating the GiP board ... the 120 day warning is completely pointless.  Almost nobody reads them (or the rules) anyway.  For an example of what I mean just take a peak in the GiP board just about any day   And even if they do read the warning, they [most probably] won't care anyway, they'll post 'cause it's what they want to do.

It would be, to my way of thinking, better to simply make it impossible to reply to an old[er] thread unless you're the one that started it.  Only if this is possible of course

I don't mind it keepin' on as it works now.  It's really not a problem for me to moderate it as is.  I rather like locking threads

Ummm ... you know, every now and then a thread comes along that actually leaves me speechless.

Welcome to Pun City.

Pun City???  I thought I was in Singapore ... damn Google maps.

What??  And deprive me of the [evil] pleasure I get from locking threads and chastising those that do the digging up?!!?!

Kidding.

I suggested something like this awhile back ... I don't think the thread should be locked.  I think it should be "suspended".  After 90 days of inactivity, the only person that can post to the thread would be the author of it.  Should somebody else try to reply it would say "thread has been inactive for over 90 days, reply not possible, PM the author if you want information about this thread"

Something like that.

I think this could go for every board ... not just the GiP.  I also don't think the reply button should be removed because if it is then we'd get a new thread every week "Why can't I reply to this thread??"

You know ... I thought my luggage felt a tad heavier than usual.  I hope you guys are having fun with the mini-elephant and blow-up doll (it's for scientific experiments)

I combined BT's post into the first post ... not sure how/why that wasn't done properly (by the rules) in the first place?

Either way...

Screenies look great!  Space Quest II holds a special place in my heart, I hope you're doing it justice!!

I have moved to Singapore.

I may be in the minority on this ... but I never [really] mind seeing an old game given a face-lift.  Even if it already had one.  I don't mind seeing somebody else give it a go.

I have a plan to [re]make an old classic (keeping it secret) ... but it's on hold until Amulet of Kings and JP & Cosmo II are finished.  Look for it around 2012 ...

What Alliance said is what I was referring to ...

here is a VERY quick paint-over to show what I mean:

I'm not from Singapore.

Cyrus ... What in the name of GOD are you doing?

This thread is more than TWO YEARS old.

STOP DIGGING UP OLD THREADS!!

I weep for the world ...

[Suggestion] - Use the search feature

This room feels about twice as big as it needs to be.

I like it ... but it lacks "over-laps" if you know what I mean?  There's a term for it ... but it's escaping me.

I think it's a good start!  Keep at it!

Harrrr!!!  Good joke matey!!  Ahoy Avast ... is that a key??

** CLICK **

Good joke Dave!

If all this off-topic ranting about April Fools doesn't stop I'm just gonna lock this thread!

Looks/sounds interesting ...

However, it still requires TWO "in game" screenshots ... please update ASAP or I'll ban your account.

Really Dave ... I'm sick of telling you the same things over and over again!

I'd been hearing rumors of this ... Glad to see it FINALLY happened!

I mean, the future is HD!!