Some of you say that you can't expect to change someone's point of view on this subject in a thread like this.
Well, I'm reading every opinion here rather seriously and I'm VERY open to changing my opinion.
I'm against the death penalty in theory, but I look at the world practically and I can also see the arguments for it.
What I want is to be the devil's advocate. I want to take the argument of every single person arguing against the death penalty and make you convince me of it's worth because I WANT to be convinced otherwise. I WANT to find a solution that works. I want people to discuss how we can get to a point where we don't need the death penalty. Is that even possible? What do we consider acceptable in the long period of time it will take us to get to that point?
I want all the this arguing (as long as it stays on topic and doesn't just because insults) because this is how we flesh out our own ideas and come to find solutions. I think a certain way now, but I might not have considered a lot of things. I should have to answer for my opinion... I want people to question what I think so I have to give a reason for it, if I can. If not, then I need to start questioning whether it's really the right way to think.
So, that was a convoluted way of saying that don't think this is pointless
I'm really enjoying this discussion and I hope I see some new points of view or get some new ideas from it, or at least that I know a little more about the validity of my own opinion.
Well, I'm reading every opinion here rather seriously and I'm VERY open to changing my opinion.
I'm against the death penalty in theory, but I look at the world practically and I can also see the arguments for it.
What I want is to be the devil's advocate. I want to take the argument of every single person arguing against the death penalty and make you convince me of it's worth because I WANT to be convinced otherwise. I WANT to find a solution that works. I want people to discuss how we can get to a point where we don't need the death penalty. Is that even possible? What do we consider acceptable in the long period of time it will take us to get to that point?
I want all the this arguing (as long as it stays on topic and doesn't just because insults) because this is how we flesh out our own ideas and come to find solutions. I think a certain way now, but I might not have considered a lot of things. I should have to answer for my opinion... I want people to question what I think so I have to give a reason for it, if I can. If not, then I need to start questioning whether it's really the right way to think.
So, that was a convoluted way of saying that don't think this is pointless
