Quote from: miguel on Wed 12/08/2009 22:53:33
And science has been proved to be capable of destroying people at a massive rate (Atomic Bomb) that you cannot deny. Although you deny the 10 Plagues, the Deluge and all that was God's destructive energy.
So, in a balance, who did more harm?
The events that can be proven by science like WWII and the likes, or some "unreal events" that by your standards never existed because there is no God?
1. People do harm, not Science or God. It's people that kill, in the name of god, money, nations or whatever.
2. Those "unreal events" don't matter at all (unless you believe in them, which should turn you in somebody who doesn't like god).
What matters is what people do with their belief or with science. Science isn't a person or an animal or any entity you can blame for building bombs. It's people who do good or bad stuff.
Quote from: Misj' on Wed 12/08/2009 23:15:10
I also agree with Nacho that religious people aren't better (and I mean that ethically, not superior or something) than non-religious people...although I think they should at least try to be (because let's face it: if God gave them the rules on how to be a good person, then they should know better).
..and that's exactly the point. If around 85% of the world population is religious.. then why isn't the world a better place? Perhaps it doesn't make you a better person at all if you're part of a religion? If you say religious people should know better, then you're implying that non-religious people don't share common rules and views... which is just plain wrong.