Messages

Yeah, we have our ways of eliminating women. If geekiness isn't enough, we'll just drown them. In their own tea!

Um excuse me? Girls can be gay too? The forum can be 100% gay and still have male and female members?

In fact the women are probably gayer than you men, so...

for fucks sake are you being serious?

I assume by "gay" you mean "an idiot". Bearing that in mind, I think it's fair to say that you're definitely gayer now than you were before you posted.

meh edited

a) Why are we still looking for Madeline McCann? How many other children have gone missing since she did? How many of these children would have been found by now if the police weren't all concentrating on one child in particular?

Oooh, okay, I'm being serious now.

Saying that more children would have been found if the police hadn't been concentrating on one child shows a massive lack of understanding of how missing child cases work.

Also, there have been few cases of children under the age of, say, 15, being abducted/raped/probably murdered by paedophiles. Most missing children cases are not as highly publicised because the children have been "kidnapped" by a parent, or in a few sad cases are obviously already dead. The case of Madeleine was highly publicised and I think rightly so, because there was a fair chance the little girl may still be alive, and she was in immediate danger unless found quickly.

There are a lot of things that you could point out as wrong or a waste of time in the madeleine coverage, but to say that other children may have been found had she not been in the "limelight" is laughable.

b) Why haven't the parents been charged with child abandonment?

I find this very annoying. It's an annoying attitude that isn't going to help anybody.

There isn't a parent in the world who hasn't, at some point, left their child vulnerable. Leaving their child a few metres away in their house at a family-friendly holiday resort may have seemed no different to eating in their back garden with their child asleep upstairs. Looking back, of course they're going to realise that it was a terrible mistake, but what is the point in charging them with child abandonment? I mean, honestly, get real. I'm sure you'd be an absolutely faultless parent, but unfortunately everybody else in only human and we all make mistakes.

Yes they made a mistake, and no, they absolutely don't deserve to be charged for it and thankfully since few other people have such a ridiculous notion in their heads, they won't be.

I do think that people who have raped, then murdered a small and helpless child should be tortured and killed.

And that's actually not a joke.

I think it would be a great idea because that way, paedophiles would be less likely to kill the child to cover up their crime. They usually kill the child not for kicks, but because they're terrified of being discovered and it's the child or them.

But if killing the child could mean weeks of painful and cruel torture followed by an extraordinarily painful death for them, there're probably not going to risk it. They might even be deterred from taking the child in the first place. Hopefully they might even commit suicide.

I know that a lot of people will think that's absolutely shocking, but while I have some sympathy for people with mental sicknesses that make them fancy small children and babies, I have no sympathy for a coward who rapes a 3 year old girl, then murders her to cover his tracks.

I did originally draw inspiration for my ideas from The Sun....

Yes it was mostly a joke.

My real plan is that there should be one big island where all the child sex offenders should live and they'll have to rape and murder each other. It would kind of be like Highlander but with child sex offenders.

I was just reading in the news about how one of the suspects in that Madeleine Mcann case is this known paedophile who is suspected to have kidnapped and probably killed another young girl last week... something like that... I only skimmed over it...

Made me think though,

What about Google Paedos, eh? It would be like Google Maps, but with paedophiles. Imagine that all Paedophiles had a chip implanted in their brain, so that it could never be removed unless they beheaded themselves. These chips are tracked using Satellites or whatever, so you can go to paedos.google.com and check to see whether there are any paedos in your area.

This works for so many reasons.

I mean, firstly... if there are any potential murderers/psychos out there, they can kill paedophiles and be a hero, instead of killing ordinary people and being ordinary psychos.

Secondly, you can google for paedos in your area! Imagine if this service had existed for the McCanns, they could have googled for paedos!





Also, people who are sexually attracted to children under the age of 12 should immediately be castrated.

I say 12, because unfortunately most men I know would fancy a 14+ year old girl... since I don't want all men to be castrated, we'll have to play it safe... go with 12... the mockery that men get for fancying underage girls should do for anyone 14 or older... as for the grey area inbetween 12 and 14... well... I dunno... Maybe you should get put on google paedos until the object of your disgusting obsession reaches maturity or something... I dunno... hmm.... I wish I was in charge of the world...

That's from Avenue Q, right?


Ethinic jokes might be uncouth,
But you laugh because
They're based on truth.

I dunno about the meaning of your life, but the meaning of my life is to become a game designer, possibly start my own company at some point in the future, marry my wonderful boyfriend and maybe start having children at about 30 plus, have a nice house and some cats and dogs and maybe a horse if we have enough land.

Well that really couldn't be further from the truth.

Children, children. We are all perfectly entitled to discussing our own views whether we've seen something or not.

Judging a movie you haven't seen is a pretty stupid idea. People are entitled to do it, sure, but it makes them pretty much an idiot.

It's not just like like somebody is generally saying "that looks crap, I'm not going to see it", Steel Drummer for instance very specifically said he hadn't seen the movie and then said that he'd been waiting years for it and all he's got is "yellow people pr0n".

But he hasn't seen the movie.

Maybe he's afraid to go and see it in the cinema in case paedophile sperm rains down on his head during the "full frontal nudity" scene? Since apparently child molesters are going to flock to the cinema to see that...

It's where niggas and crackas collide.

Actually the only people I hear screaming RACISM these days is over-sensitive white people panicking that another white person might have offended a non-white person...

(and that one black woman who's whining about RE5 and her 10 year old nephew magically getting a copy of RE4)

The only way to move past racism is for everybody to stop being so oversensitive to it. The way things are at the moment is ridiculous. Over-sensitivies are drawing attention to an imaginary divide between white and black people. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if people felt awkward or uncomfortable around people of a different colour simple because we're all so fucking afraid of offending each other.

Look at that stupid Emily Parr woman who got kicked off big brother for saying "nigger". She said it in a friendly way, to a friend, no different than people do every day. The black girl didn't even mind - she only decided to draw attention to it later when she realised she could use it to become the next Shilpa Shetty...

Now I understand that there are sensitivities to this word, but unfortunately, people are going to have to get over it. We can't keep tiptoeing around things like this, afraid of offending people. There is a huge difference between screaming at somebody that they are a nigger and using it as an insult, which is racism, and using it on a friendly basis, which is not racism. I used to jokingly greet one of my white friends by saying, "Yo, what up nigga?!???". Clearly I wasn't being racist...

In her post-big brother interview, the interviewer kept interrupting Emily when she was trying to explain why she'd said "nigger", to remind her "That's no excuse though is it?" "but you're not trying to excuse what you did?"  FUCK OFF Davina Maccaul, grow a pair of balls and admit that it really wasn't a big deal! Even worse, the stupid girl apologised so profusely and didn't stick up for herself at all! Never was it mentioned that the black girl had already said "nigger" herself many times, never was it mentioned that it was simply a friendly joke, it was treated as though this girl was an actual racist! She was treated like a racist SHOULD be treated... except she wasn't racist and it was obvious!

Also I share the experience of having people give me uncomfy, unsure looks when I describe somebody as being black. For example, in our company there are about 6 girls, one of which is black. I asked somebody to deliver a message to one of the girls, but they didn't know what she looked like, so I said "she's the black girl that works upstairs." The person looked at me as though I'd just said the most horribly racist thing.

But 6 months ago, there was only one girl working upstairs, and when people asked me who "Jo" was, I would say, "She's the girl that works upstairs". When you're trying to describe somebody, you give their most immediately noticable features, correct? Everybody is going to immediately identify the only girl from a crowd of men. Everybody is going to immediately identify the only black girl in a crowd of white girls. To pretend there's no different in skin colour is not only silly, but it's also downright insulting. If people were afraid of describing me as a white girl in case it offended me, I'd be angry. I'd be angry too that there was some kind of unspoken awkwardness between us just because I had a different skin colour from everyone I worked with, and everybody was pretending not to notice it.

By constantly drawing attention to things like this, and by being so overly sensitive, people are making things a lot worse.

Hang on, what?

You're judging the movie without even having seen it?

Jeez... I have an idea, why don't people either

1. see the movie, then judge it
2. don't see the movie but stop complaining about it

Stop stealing other peoples opinions and grow your own... for heavens sake there's nothing worse than people judging things they haven't even seen/heard/experienced...

Those are exactly my feelings about how this forum judges Indy IV, but I'll reserve that for another thread...

(the indy IV thread?)

Hang on, what?

You're judging the movie without even having seen it?

Jeez... I have an idea, why don't people either

1. see the movie, then judge it
2. don't see the movie but stop complaining about it

Stop stealing other peoples opinions and grow your own... for heavens sake there's nothing worse than people judging things they haven't even seen/heard/experienced...

I hope you're joking about child molesters being pleased to see Bart's genitals. I mean, don't be ridiculous, really. Do you think child molesters are going to sit in the back of the cinema masturbating because they saw a few seconds worth of a bart's badly-drawn genitals?

Also, I thought the movie was absolutely fantastic and I cried laughing many times throughout it, but then I stopped watching the series about 7 or 8 years ago because it started getting shit. Maybe if you've been watching it for 18 years, you're a little tired of it by now.

I disagree with stupot, by the way. You shouldn't send that letter by the way because it reads like you already DID get 18 years of your life back and were 5 when you wrote it.

Check out my bunny jumper!



Sorry about the blurriness... it was taken during a night of free booze.
Also generally I'm not that sweaty, but the place was sooo hot... and I was wearing a bunny jumper

Well... when you return to this thread, I'd like to ask you the likelihood that the pigeon asked her for a fight and then claimed it had many rows of razor sharp teeth with which to bite her.

Do you really think that a pigeon would say that?

I give up, why bother flying the government propaganda 'it rot holes in your brain'. It just goes to show our society is ignorant, I sympathise with you atheists because there is too much of a religious domination going on in America. About your friend and the pigeon? consider the possibility he is using hyperbole, exagerating or is just lying, many people bad mouthing LSD do so without ever trying it and because they hear old wives tales about how it 'messes you up'

My friend wasn't lying, she takes LSD from time to time and enjoys it. As a drug, she likes it. Again, you're making terrible assumptions...

...and while it could do, you would have to be already genetically predisposed to schizophrenia

So how does her experience differ from yours, in which you spoke to plants and everything had a living conciousness... including rocks? What makes her "genetically predisposed" to schizophrenia, while you're not?

(in reality, alcohol and tobacco are miles more damaging).

Debatable, although I would tend to agree that OCCASIONAL use of acid or 'shrooms etc is almost definitely less harmful than the binge drinking and excessive smoking that a lot of people partake in every single day of their lives...

There is nothing 'mickey mouse' hallucinations with LSD and if you don't believe me then look on Erowid or any other websites.

My friend imagined that a pigeon was talking to her. She met the pigeon face-to-face in person, she just imagined that it was speaking to her. This is absolutely no different from you speaking to plants, rocks, etc. It's not a "mickey mouse" hallucination. It's no different from yours, you just don't realise that because the idea of talking to a pigeon seems somehow less feasible to you, than speaking with plants.

its not fair to take concepts such as 'telepathy' and use it empirically. Like I said, its impossible to convey the language used. The telepathic thought, I would describe it as tapping into a 'logos' or great conciousness. Whether or not you agree that is what happens or I am deluding myself isn't important. I didn't need drugs to think like this, it only affirmed my preexisting inner-voice that something wasn't right about atheism

Perhaps you are the one with a genetic predisposition to schizophrenia, and not my friend?

I really do find it interesting that you're using drug-induced hallucinations to confirm the existence of god to yourself. Possibly these posts all belond in a separate thread by now... but yeah... it's a pretty weak argument.

I also wish you'd stop making massive assumptions about things that possibly contradict your argument.