I just recently, (last night), got into a conversation with my roomate about this. Where I said that by banning gay mariage, the goverment is persecuting the gay community. He thought the word persecution was too strong for what was being done. I disagree. The word persecution means:
"To oppress or harass with ill-treatment, especially because of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs. "
-http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=persecute
To me this is outrageous to call a country "free" and have in the constitution "Seperation of Church and State," and have a situation like this. Why is it, persecution? Because we are denying a people their right to something, we're saying because you're a women and your a man, you guys can have this cookie, but we won't serve anything to you two men/women.
My roomate then went to argue (mind you, he was just arguing to argue, and probably doesn't believe this, as he is liberal), that if we allowed gay marriage, why not allow a man to marry a dog? At first this kind of threw me off. If you say a person should be free to marry whomever they wish, and they wish to marry a dog, why shouldn't they be allowed to? Simply because a dog has no way of telling you that it would like to marry you, and isn't really aware of the lifelong "bond" that is marriage.
The thing that really bothers me about it, though, is it in no way effects me. I am not effected if two men in San Fransisco get married. If two men next door get married, I am not effected by it. Whether I'm offended or not (I'm not), it in no way makes my life better or worse. So why make a law that doesn't give a people a right given to everyone else?
-MillsJROSS
"To oppress or harass with ill-treatment, especially because of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs. "
-http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=persecute
To me this is outrageous to call a country "free" and have in the constitution "Seperation of Church and State," and have a situation like this. Why is it, persecution? Because we are denying a people their right to something, we're saying because you're a women and your a man, you guys can have this cookie, but we won't serve anything to you two men/women.
My roomate then went to argue (mind you, he was just arguing to argue, and probably doesn't believe this, as he is liberal), that if we allowed gay marriage, why not allow a man to marry a dog? At first this kind of threw me off. If you say a person should be free to marry whomever they wish, and they wish to marry a dog, why shouldn't they be allowed to? Simply because a dog has no way of telling you that it would like to marry you, and isn't really aware of the lifelong "bond" that is marriage.
The thing that really bothers me about it, though, is it in no way effects me. I am not effected if two men in San Fransisco get married. If two men next door get married, I am not effected by it. Whether I'm offended or not (I'm not), it in no way makes my life better or worse. So why make a law that doesn't give a people a right given to everyone else?
-MillsJROSS