Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - OneThinkingGal and ._.

#21
General Discussion / Re:Potter puppet pals...
Thu 18/12/2003 03:25:45
Pretty cool Rhombus Trapezoid.

I like the first one better, that bother-bother bit was great. And I liked the "bounciness" of the puppets.
#22
General Discussion / Re:Take the quiz
Thu 18/12/2003 01:45:55
Quote from: Isegrim on Wed 17/12/2003 14:29:16
here comes the Schizoid Goth Sheep!

(seemingly being unable to get the pictures right here... nevermind, I guess)



Nah, quizilla is just down sometimes. Just post the URL and it'll show up later. :)

Cool Bluke, eyes don't hurt anymore.  ;D
#23
General Discussion / Re:Take the quiz
Wed 17/12/2003 02:21:59
Doh :( I fixed it. Thanks.  :)

Btw...Your signature is very flashy and is making my eyes hurt...any chance of changing it? :P

Oh yeah, I've done the personality disorder one, I think I was obs. compulsive too.   ^_^
#24
General Discussion / Re:Take the quiz
Tue 16/12/2003 23:36:19
Yay cute sheep ^_^


You are a -
Geek Sheep!
you're one l33t g33|< 5|-|33p! No one understands a word you're saying, but you don't care. Bespectacled geek by day, fearsome DND warrior by night! Geek power ;)


Who me?!

Doh: http://www.lacota.net/alanna/quiz.html
#25
General Discussion / Re:Saddam Captured?
Tue 16/12/2003 00:24:11
How is it unfair that I can't post links(aside from the second) that are interviews of people who were actually THERE and you can spout second hand knowledge without a source?  ???

There's always more than one story, don't believe everything you're told by the government or the media, or anyone else with an agenda. Like me.   :P

In the end, people will believe what they want to, I just point out there's more than one side to the story.
#26
General Discussion / Re:Saddam Captured?
Mon 15/12/2003 23:57:38
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saddam/interviews/rahman.html

http://www.polyconomics.com/searchbase/11-18-98.html
Yes dodgy site, but there's evidence of the same report elsewhere. Search for the title. May or may not be true, but something to think about anyway.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saddam/interviews/talabani.html
#27
Quote from: Rincewind on Mon 15/12/2003 17:36:04
Ehm... No. For everything that's holy: No. I love everything that is artistic, muscial or similar and I'm absolutely not practical...  I don't trust this thing at all... :)

That's what it said for scotch too.  ::) I wouldn't throw any money at these people if I was him.  ;D
#28
Quote from: earlwood on Mon 15/12/2003 13:31:15

[edit]
Thanks Thinking Girl, you allways find a way for me to post without much thinking, not to mention how much my post figures could improve with all these quizzes and shanagins.

Haha :P No problem, its not stopping some people from getting too serious though. ;)
#29
General Discussion / Re:Saddam Captured?
Sun 14/12/2003 20:07:47
That's really what Bush is counting on, to turn this into a 'humanitarian feel-good mission'. And I think he will succeed. :) If that's what this is about, why Iraq and why not Cuba?

How much better off are the iraqis? All the shia-sunni stuff will continue, there will still be killings, only now there won't be anyone specific to blame. Its the cultural and religious sitation of the region, one which the US can do nothing about, except maybe make it worse.
#30
I didn't mean you Pessi. :) I just meant in general, people seem resistant to things that aren't 100% provable. I just like to think we don't know it all, not that we should blindly believe everything but not claim we know everything for fact either. Like you, I was also thinking out loud.

Sorry if it came across as an attack on you or anyone specific.  :)
#31
General Discussion / Re:Saddam Captured?
Sun 14/12/2003 19:31:29
Quote from: WanderLady on Sun 14/12/2003 19:14:56
Quote from: OneThinkingGal and ._. on Sun 14/12/2003 16:48:45
Its irrelevant either way.

OTG, could you explain what you mean? I'm confused by it.

Meaning, who cares. Saddam was only the target of the war because he had these supposed weapons on mass destruction, which were all false claims.

Without them, he was just a dictator with a dream, much like the ones in Cuba or North Korea. Of course, they don't have oil to use for kickbacks to Bush's buddies, so there's no way taxpayers' money will be spent on going to war with them.
#32
Quote from: Pessi on Sun 14/12/2003 18:23:28

All this in mind, I think this uh, thingabob is fun. But that's all there is for me. And even the fun stops when you start paying for it. If anyone thinks I'm wrong, it's alright. Just give me your reasons and hopefully you'll prove me wrong. And I'd just like to say that as always, I mean no harm to anyone by this post. This was not directed at anyone especially, this is just my opinion which hopefully will be proved wrong. If anyone feels that Kabalarian Philosophy is correct - your opinion is as good as mine.

:) I posted it merely as a bit of fun, I don't think its possible to exactly prove it right or wrong, especially since each of us has an opinion of ourselves that may or may not match other people's opinion of us.

Its quite funny that people feel the need to 'disprove' it. I'm not marketing thier services or claiming its the absolute truth. ^_^

In case anyone wants a label, its called Acrophonology and it may very well be a pseudoscience, but its still fun.


#33
General Discussion / Re:Saddam Captured?
Sun 14/12/2003 18:09:31
Considering the Bush administration's cronies are making a nice profit in Iraq: http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20031212_1665.html

I expect that the US won't pull out soon. Unless of course, people complain that they can't afford the war anymore, then maybe. Otherwise, three cheers for capitalism!!
#34
General Discussion / Re:Saddam Captured?
Sun 14/12/2003 16:48:45
Maybe they have and maybe they haven't.  Its irrelevant either way.

I bet they will project this as a victory...shifting the focus from the WMDs....bring on the spin doctors.  ::)
#35
General Discussion / Re:Take the quiz
Sun 14/12/2003 15:46:24

Thoughtful; hmmm, what is the purpose of humanity? Existance?? The UNIVERSE????


What facial expression are you?
#36
Quote from: Shattered Sponge on Sun 14/12/2003 12:59:32

Quite clever how they say things that they know people would like to believe about themselves (even if they may seem, on first glance, negative), yet (in my case, at least) may not be even remotely true.  They almost had me.

Unhhh....so I'd LIKE to hear that I have a lack of confidence....how does that work :p It didn't tell AGA that, and he has no shortage of confidence. :P

Although most of the things they say are positive, at least they are specific enough to not apply to everyone.

* OneThinkingGal and ._. smacks pudding a bit for only posting his result
#37
I know one theory is that the sound of your name shapes you, so maybe whatever you're called usually would be the most accurate. That's what I used for mine...

Oh yeah, here's what it says on the site:
Which has more influence, my legal name or a nickname?

Both will have an influence, but the original name is the underlying blueprint. Sometimes, one name is used at home, and the other at work. In these cases, the person will behave and think differently in each environment according to the names used.  

yada yada marketing etc here
#38
Bring on the sceptics. :D I notice you people aren't posting your results. Post them. ^_^

#39
Yup it does. It does not originate from America. The things being advertised may be american, but the emails are sent out from the far east somewhere, also russian areas.
#40
Where are you from Oliver? :P

Like I said, the people who like it are the people who don't actually have to do anything with it.  :P
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk