The "trailer" posted on the website isn't so much a trailer as it is a sneak peek. The movie isn't even finished yet. I suggest waiting until the movie comes out and you see it before you condemn it.
Also, this is just silly. Aside from the fact that Phillip Pullman named Nichole Kidman for the role of Mrs. Coulter before she had it, is any role really meant for a celebrity? Actors' jobs are to pretend they're something they're not. And the people cast in the roles are good actors (the people I've heard of, at least). Daniel Craig is a fan of the books, as is the little girl cast as Lyra. I'm sure they're just as emotionally invested in them as you are, and wouldn't be okay with being in a half-assed version.
As far as the religious stuff is concerned, I'll just say this. Hollywood can really surprise you. Sometimes producers, writers, and directors aren't afraid to go into that sort of thing. Look at the first and third Indiana Jones movies. They are heavy with religious iconography and they're still considered family films.
And while religion is the underlying reason for the stories, it's not the whole thing. I didn't even notice any religious stuff at all my first read through the books (except the third, which is more blatant than the first two about the religious undertones). I'm sure most kids who're fans didn't notice them either. You have to remember, they're mostly making this movie for the kids who are the fans, and while I'm sure they won't just make it a "kiddy movie", because it's not just a "kiddy book", that IS their target audience. If they please all the kids who loved the books, then they'll make their money and be happy.
Honestly, I don't know why you're letting yourself get so worked up about it. Who cares if a bunch of people you don't know think about a book you love differently than it was meant? Maybe this movie will make them want to read the book and then they'll learn better.
Quote from: ghost(b) a lot of very prominent celebrities in roles not really meant for them
Also, this is just silly. Aside from the fact that Phillip Pullman named Nichole Kidman for the role of Mrs. Coulter before she had it, is any role really meant for a celebrity? Actors' jobs are to pretend they're something they're not. And the people cast in the roles are good actors (the people I've heard of, at least). Daniel Craig is a fan of the books, as is the little girl cast as Lyra. I'm sure they're just as emotionally invested in them as you are, and wouldn't be okay with being in a half-assed version.
As far as the religious stuff is concerned, I'll just say this. Hollywood can really surprise you. Sometimes producers, writers, and directors aren't afraid to go into that sort of thing. Look at the first and third Indiana Jones movies. They are heavy with religious iconography and they're still considered family films.
And while religion is the underlying reason for the stories, it's not the whole thing. I didn't even notice any religious stuff at all my first read through the books (except the third, which is more blatant than the first two about the religious undertones). I'm sure most kids who're fans didn't notice them either. You have to remember, they're mostly making this movie for the kids who are the fans, and while I'm sure they won't just make it a "kiddy movie", because it's not just a "kiddy book", that IS their target audience. If they please all the kids who loved the books, then they'll make their money and be happy.
Honestly, I don't know why you're letting yourself get so worked up about it. Who cares if a bunch of people you don't know think about a book you love differently than it was meant? Maybe this movie will make them want to read the book and then they'll learn better.