Snarky, the point is I was watching the road. I was more concerned about my ENVIRONMENT than my speedometer. I don't think road safety hinges entirely on what speed you're going, like if you always go the exact speed limit nothing bad can happen. Driving is inherently dangerous, and it takes more common sense than anything else. It was an entirely straight road, with no curves or corners and the speed zone was about to change to 45. (Like I said, I was so close that by the time I pulled over, I was already IN the 45 zone.)
The law specifies that the operator the vehicle is responsible for piloting it in a way that is prudent for current conditions. There were no hazards on the road that day, such as ice or water.
I don't care about the money, I care about the prinicipal of the situation, that is I am charged with doing something I'm not sure I did. I want to know what my options are. Is that so wrong? Or am I just supposed to throw my hands up and say, "Well, the authorities only have our safety in mind. How noble of they are. I think I will just do what they tell me to." Now that's not saying that I'm going to purposely speed and break the law. In fact, I abhore the stereotype that males my age (19) are all dangerous or bad drivers when I attempt to be the OPPOSITE.
Most street cops (especially in small towns) are NOT concerned with public safety. Most of them (not all) are corrupt and into drugs, and abuse the system for their own motives. For instance, we had a sherriff in office for YEARS who was deeply rooted in a drug circle and was practically insane. (There were other officers with guns ready at his trial, he was so unstable.) Yet, until his position was threatened, he seemed totally cool and normal. It took the loss of his position to another candidate to reveal who he really was after all these years in power.
So, to those saying just pay the ticket, don't question, and humor the cop because he maybe HAD A BAD DAY, I say no. I'm not just gonna say "I must've deserved it" when I really don't know if I did. I at LEAST wanna know what the radar SAID. That's WHAT the court is for, so we can figure this stuff out.
The law specifies that the operator the vehicle is responsible for piloting it in a way that is prudent for current conditions. There were no hazards on the road that day, such as ice or water.
I don't care about the money, I care about the prinicipal of the situation, that is I am charged with doing something I'm not sure I did. I want to know what my options are. Is that so wrong? Or am I just supposed to throw my hands up and say, "Well, the authorities only have our safety in mind. How noble of they are. I think I will just do what they tell me to." Now that's not saying that I'm going to purposely speed and break the law. In fact, I abhore the stereotype that males my age (19) are all dangerous or bad drivers when I attempt to be the OPPOSITE.
Most street cops (especially in small towns) are NOT concerned with public safety. Most of them (not all) are corrupt and into drugs, and abuse the system for their own motives. For instance, we had a sherriff in office for YEARS who was deeply rooted in a drug circle and was practically insane. (There were other officers with guns ready at his trial, he was so unstable.) Yet, until his position was threatened, he seemed totally cool and normal. It took the loss of his position to another candidate to reveal who he really was after all these years in power.
So, to those saying just pay the ticket, don't question, and humor the cop because he maybe HAD A BAD DAY, I say no. I'm not just gonna say "I must've deserved it" when I really don't know if I did. I at LEAST wanna know what the radar SAID. That's WHAT the court is for, so we can figure this stuff out.