I'll have to disagree with some things here ...
You can take a look at this A 2009 Daily Mail article which states that "Government NHS policy has placed the emphasis on vote-winning targets such as waiting times, rather than focusing on care".
[/quote]
For example last Monday my 77 year old aunt phoned her doctor to complain about being tired, short of breath, and feeling lousy. Before the end of the day she was booked into the hospital, had blood tests for heart attack and stroke, MRI, and other tests performed, and had seen a cardiac specialist who diagnosed her with cardiac arrhythmia. He told her that she needed a pace maker but wanted to monitor her heart for a couple of days to confirm his diagnosis. So he booked her into the telemetry unit where they wire you up to a wireless monitor that continuously measures heart and other things 24/7. The resulting measurements are transmitted to the nurses station where it is monitored and recorded for doctors' later use. She had surgery on Wednesday to implant her pacemaker and went home on Friday.
Now compare this with the UK where my aunt would have had to wait 10-18 weeks before receiving treatment. ...
http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=118403
http://www.drfosterhealth.co.uk/hospital-guide/hospital/nhs/Liverpool-Heart-and-Chest-Hospital-1183.aspx?procedure=CARDPACEMAKER
That is if she recieved treatment at all. As I understand it NHS does QOL assements to determine what treatments "are worth it"'. Based on this and other news I hear about NHS from time to time I am not sure my auntie would be deemed worthy.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1163064/HARRIET-SERGEANT-Why-does-NHS-hate-elderly-much.html
You don't have to be very smart to know that when you get fucked by your government your FUCKED! and have no recourse.
Honestly, I just can't understand why people put so much trust in government. Have you never dealt with any government agency? The people there are dumbest fuckers you will ever meet. Sure they are probably nice folks when they are at home but at work behave like a bunch of escapees from a Monthy Python skit.
For example the first of the year I rented a PO Box for my wife's business. The idea was to have a secure address where we could receive 2-3 checks each month. At the end of the month I went to check on the box and found it stuffed to the max with catalogs and other junk mail addressed to some other guy. I took this huge pile of mail to the clerk and complained the cobversation went soemthing like this:
RickJ: Someone else's mail was plugging up my little mail box.
Clerk: No! Its your mail all right!
RickJ: But that's not my name.
Clerk: Yeah but right here is says "or Resident".
RickJ: But that's not my name either.
Clerk: No it's not a name, it means who ever is living at that addrress.
RickJ: But I don't live here at the post office do I.
Clerk: I doesn't matter we still have to deliver that mail to you
RickJ: Why it's not my mail.
Clerk: I don't know we just have to do it.
RickJ: But I don't want it
Clerk: I doesn't matter
RickJ: I can't use the box like this, it's useless to me.
Clerk: I don't care but you can talk to the post master but he's not here to day ..
a few days later I return and talk to the postmaster ...
RickJ: I'm having a problem with the PO Box I recently rented. It's getting plugged up with catalogues and other junk mail making it unusable for my business purposes.
Postmaster: Yeah, probably the previous renter didn't fill out a change of address form so that's why you're still getting his mail. If he had filled out the proper forms we would just forwaerd his mial and you wouldn't get it.
RickJ: Ok, so I just have to fill out some forms yto get this fixed
Postmaster: Oh no, you can't fill out the forms.
RickJ: Why not?
Postmaster: Because it's not your mail.
RickJ: That's what I told the clerk but he said that you have to deliver it to me any way.
Postmaster: Yes that's right.
RickJ: Why?
Postmaster: I don't know why, we just have to.
RickJ: Isn't there anything I can do?
Postmaster: (yells to an employee in back room) Hey Fred! What's up with box 147.
Employee: Oh, that was old Herb's box.
Postmaster: Oh! now I understand what happened. The gentleman who previously rented that box passed away.
RickJ: Ok, so you're not gong to be sending his mail to me anymore?
Postmaster: Oh no! We have to.
RickJ: Why?
Postmaster: Because it's addressed to you box and he hasn't filled out a change of address form ...
RickJ: ... because he's dead?
Postmaster: Yes thats right!
No kidding this actually happened to me just a couple of months ago.
QuoteIt is true that insurance companies are in business to make a profit but is absurd to believe that mistreating customers is the optimal means of maximising profit. Indeed this a a formula for failure and bankruptcy rather than success. I don't think profit is a bad thing. It's the incentive that drives an organisation to operate efficiently, eliminate waste, and to continuously improve it's self. The tried and true way to success in private business is to provide a superior product or service and/or a better price that the competition.
The insurance companies have as their primary aim making money. It is in their best interest to give you as little health care as possible for the highest price you will accept.
Quote"or at least in theroy" is an admition that this is not the case. The incentives in a government bureaucracy are all backwards. Instead of having incentive to eliminate waste and inefficiency government agencies routinely and without exception endeavour to consume ALL funds and resources allocated to them by politicians. Among government workers it is universally accepted that thgis is an open invitation to politicians to allocate fewer funds and resources in in the future and is to be avoided at all costs. How can such a system be expected to produce optimal results?
The government has as their primary aim the welfare of the citizens (or at least in theory). It is in their best interest to give you as much health care as possible for the lowest price they can manage.
You can take a look at this A 2009 Daily Mail article which states that "Government NHS policy has placed the emphasis on vote-winning targets such as waiting times, rather than focusing on care".
[/quote]
QuoteTo which studies are you referring and in what way is the US health care system inferior?
... According to studies, healthcare in the USA is about thrice as expensive overall while being inferior in quality to that in Europe. I do not think that is a coincidence.
For example last Monday my 77 year old aunt phoned her doctor to complain about being tired, short of breath, and feeling lousy. Before the end of the day she was booked into the hospital, had blood tests for heart attack and stroke, MRI, and other tests performed, and had seen a cardiac specialist who diagnosed her with cardiac arrhythmia. He told her that she needed a pace maker but wanted to monitor her heart for a couple of days to confirm his diagnosis. So he booked her into the telemetry unit where they wire you up to a wireless monitor that continuously measures heart and other things 24/7. The resulting measurements are transmitted to the nurses station where it is monitored and recorded for doctors' later use. She had surgery on Wednesday to implant her pacemaker and went home on Friday.
Now compare this with the UK where my aunt would have had to wait 10-18 weeks before receiving treatment. ...
http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=118403
http://www.drfosterhealth.co.uk/hospital-guide/hospital/nhs/Liverpool-Heart-and-Chest-Hospital-1183.aspx?procedure=CARDPACEMAKER
That is if she recieved treatment at all. As I understand it NHS does QOL assements to determine what treatments "are worth it"'. Based on this and other news I hear about NHS from time to time I am not sure my auntie would be deemed worthy.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1163064/HARRIET-SERGEANT-Why-does-NHS-hate-elderly-much.html
QuoteIf a private private company screws you over that you many options. They can be sued in a court, reported to the the state Attorney General, report to Better Business Bureau, boycotted, reported to mass media, publish the details on the internet, etc, etc.
America is easily the most pure capitalist nation in the world and even poor 'rednecks' seem to oppose any kind of socialism, until they get sick anyway.
You don't have to be very smart to know that when you get fucked by your government your FUCKED! and have no recourse.
Honestly, I just can't understand why people put so much trust in government. Have you never dealt with any government agency? The people there are dumbest fuckers you will ever meet. Sure they are probably nice folks when they are at home but at work behave like a bunch of escapees from a Monthy Python skit.
For example the first of the year I rented a PO Box for my wife's business. The idea was to have a secure address where we could receive 2-3 checks each month. At the end of the month I went to check on the box and found it stuffed to the max with catalogs and other junk mail addressed to some other guy. I took this huge pile of mail to the clerk and complained the cobversation went soemthing like this:
RickJ: Someone else's mail was plugging up my little mail box.
Clerk: No! Its your mail all right!
RickJ: But that's not my name.
Clerk: Yeah but right here is says "or Resident".
RickJ: But that's not my name either.
Clerk: No it's not a name, it means who ever is living at that addrress.
RickJ: But I don't live here at the post office do I.
Clerk: I doesn't matter we still have to deliver that mail to you
RickJ: Why it's not my mail.
Clerk: I don't know we just have to do it.
RickJ: But I don't want it
Clerk: I doesn't matter
RickJ: I can't use the box like this, it's useless to me.
Clerk: I don't care but you can talk to the post master but he's not here to day ..
a few days later I return and talk to the postmaster ...
RickJ: I'm having a problem with the PO Box I recently rented. It's getting plugged up with catalogues and other junk mail making it unusable for my business purposes.
Postmaster: Yeah, probably the previous renter didn't fill out a change of address form so that's why you're still getting his mail. If he had filled out the proper forms we would just forwaerd his mial and you wouldn't get it.
RickJ: Ok, so I just have to fill out some forms yto get this fixed
Postmaster: Oh no, you can't fill out the forms.
RickJ: Why not?
Postmaster: Because it's not your mail.
RickJ: That's what I told the clerk but he said that you have to deliver it to me any way.
Postmaster: Yes that's right.
RickJ: Why?
Postmaster: I don't know why, we just have to.
RickJ: Isn't there anything I can do?
Postmaster: (yells to an employee in back room) Hey Fred! What's up with box 147.
Employee: Oh, that was old Herb's box.
Postmaster: Oh! now I understand what happened. The gentleman who previously rented that box passed away.
RickJ: Ok, so you're not gong to be sending his mail to me anymore?
Postmaster: Oh no! We have to.
RickJ: Why?
Postmaster: Because it's addressed to you box and he hasn't filled out a change of address form ...
RickJ: ... because he's dead?
Postmaster: Yes thats right!
No kidding this actually happened to me just a couple of months ago.