What's wrong with Gen-Gen?

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: TerranRich on Mon 06/07/2009 00:10:49
Trihan: You always use a comma before "which".
Quote from: Trihan on Sun 05/07/2009 05:32:39
In this case, you actually were on your way to the shops,
Quote from: AtelierGames on Sat 04/07/2009 08:27:21I think the use of the colon means that you can leave 'and' out. You have decided to write your list horizontally, but if you were to write it veritacally it would look like this:
I've always written lists like this...
- I need: Milk, flour, eggs, sugar, and rocks. (For a rock cake
)
But recently I was told there should be no comma before the and. Ever. Is this right? And would it be grammatically correct to write it like this, without an and?
- I need: Milk, flour, eggs, sugar, rocks.
Thanks. I like the thread title change by the way.
Quote21. With to and inf.: To be accustomed or wont to do something.
In very frequent use from c 1400, but now only in pa. tense used to, [...], and colloq. in did (not) use (or used) to: see also USEN'T, USETER; used to could: see CAN v.1 A. 7.
Quote from: Oliwerko on Wed 01/07/2009 11:10:29Quote from: kaputtnik on Wed 01/07/2009 11:09:17
Normally you should think "I didn't use to" was the right way to put it.
Yup, that's the correct way. "Didn't used to" is wrong.
By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies. Please visit this page to see exactly how we use these.
Page created in 3.060 seconds with 15 queries.