Messages

geez, Zooty, I waited for so long before you agreed to tell us those. Now there'll be no problems to any of us.

How about, another cliche, they run into each other several times and start to dislike each other. Then by time they realize their hatered is love... There was a movie like this with George Cloney and Michelle Pfeiffer iirc.

JkciR... hmm, nah, get something more original, I think we have enough people from a land as it is. (No offence)

Dunno, sounds more or less absurd. If I'd want that, get a better reputation, I'd start an alter ego without ever informing that I left in the first place. Have a few nicks here and there, you'd never knew who you were talking to¬¬

Well, if we will be hearing from Lubena, either that he/she/they is/are LJUBI reincarnated or not, we will never know if every newcomer is LJUBI or not. That's why I think it's silly. Now if it was so, I'd much rather hear from LJUBI themselves that they did this. I'd appreciate, and after this, it'd chenge my way of seeing them, not that I had anything against them in the first place. But if Lubena turns out to be LJUBI I wouldn't know what to think, I'd be disappointed. And that goes for everyone, not just LJUBI, since it's always you why people don't like you. (or in some cases Hotspot ).

And I'd say about awards that people should be asked if they even want to be nominated for FOREGOs, like they do with Oscars, not like they do with Nobels, just to prevent these situations...

No that's right, Vict0r, We wouldn't anyone to pet little kittens now, would we?

I agree, so I appologise on my behalf for letting all these words come out of my fingers,Ã,  they were in good will anyway. I say we keep the arguing and retarding where it belongs, the #AGS that is

No actually I was born with IQ over 140, mind you Though I'm still not in Uni.

About the sentence, I have no idea, but I'd say, that something run away, a pig jumped? Kass... not a sack of somekind? No that's not it.
Kes loeb on loll... Kebab is lol... Ã,  Te first sentence is that one should never buy a pig (?) in a sack... oder auf Duetsch, kein Katze I'm Sack kaufen.... the second... something about love, right? who's love is ... who's isn't or something like that:P
Well, I don't really know, tell me if I'm close, I'm only 15 and have only learned Estonian for 4 years....

Nah, I'm kidding here man, except for the first, you're cool, tell me if I'm close, okay? yay.

Vict0r, Det var inte så skönt vad du sade. Tyvärr kan jag inte Norska, men du kan fatta den här åckso, tänker jag.

HAHA It was becaue my father was annoying me at that moment :

anyways, Pablo, I never will, they earn so little. And I've never even studied English grammar, you should know, you have my books and they're empty. Hardly a teacher who doesn't know what the sections are called.

But thanks to you both, at least someone read it after all the work I put init.

I Ã, figured it'd be nice if I helped a bit

Let's start with basics. After every dot "." comes a capital. LEt''s have an example: "I know. This is why I always do it so." Now note that I left some space between the dot and the capital letter. This is used to make reading it easier.
It is also a must to use a capital I when talking about yourself.

Then let's study some vocabulary, because, man I should know it, there's always mroe and more funnny words for us to learn

Ã,  1. A Person is people in plural. so you must say people are, not persons are and certainly not peoples are. That is unless they are defined as certain independent gruops of people. Still I wouldn' say that because it isn't right.
Ã,  2. theoretically, not theoretycly.
Ã,  3. in a word like write, that end with e. as in smile, drive and such, the "continuance form" -ing is written without the e as in writing, driving. smiling....etc.
Ã,  4. Note that it helps the readers if you spellcheck what you have written. Take example: you wrote qestion. Now I reckon even a Spanish midget with lazy eyes would write that after studying 4 years and as you know, let's place there question instead.
Ã,  5. basic grammar. I am, you are, he/she is. We are, You are, They are. basically 6 rules to remember, and by tie you don't have to remember, they're in your spine
Ã,  6. Simple rule on the past form. If the senctence already hold the word did, it indicates that the sentence is in past form and thus no other past form is neede nor allowed. Example: "Did I sayed" is wrong... insted: "did I say". Anyway, sayed is wrong too, when the verb ends with a Y, there's no -yed in the past form. Try said instead.
Ã,  7. I assume, that with this sentence: "donyt make oviousy fool conclusions." you meant: "Don't make conclusions that are obviously foolish." A bit off spellchecking here, and the sentence would be readable, am I not right?
Ã,  8. few correct spellings:
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -Supporter, not suporter. You support, not suport.
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -Manager, not magnager, or at least I've never heard anyone magnage anything.
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -it's actually, not actualy... to the word actual, you add the -ly.
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -it's Gymnasium... and that's the same as gym afaik.
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -amount, not amout... spellcheck spellcheck, shiss-_-
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -and it's profassional, not proffesional. Yo uunderstand how rediculous it sound when you claim your almost proffesional and can't even write it correctly
Ã,  Ã,  Ã, -samll? Please man, are you even trying to write correctly?
Ã,  9. You wrote protsent. I don't know what it is in Estonian, but in English it's percentage... and in THE world.

The rest, I don't even bother to translate. But I'll try that Estonian sentence for fun. Well, the CAPS part of it means something like , who makes a big number of ... Igast... thing... as in asjast must be "thing with a preposition, as in a big number of something. Shit, I've never even read any Estonian, but it's so like Finnish

Yay now, keep it up and coming

Just a few not to add to those first posts.
-If I were you, I'd check the walls of the house again, or to be specific, the broads. THe ones in the "door side" are a tiny bit wider than the ones after the corner to the window.
-then I'd lower the horizon a bit... and add some trees too
Adn I wonder what's that gray-brown-ish wall under the porch and the satirs, I thought it night be some concrete bases to keep the house together, but yet it leaves a hole under the sairs in the front, not on the side... just looks odd to me. OH, and the snow looks a bit like it's going into it. maybe give some darker shading?

Wow, lucky you.
My sister's boyfriend had the same kind before they moved in together, but it was much smaller. The blueprint is exactly the same. It was a student flat that the local association provides them, considered to be a rather good one at that. But it still had the same rent but was MUCH smaller.

Oh, and did I mention that the following 15 songs were crap?

To think of it, I've always preached my friends, that you can't think of music as in genres. Sure, there are a few heavy bands I like, some pop, damn I even find some rap good, rarely, but some. And I was assuming after the first ones, that this had loads of progressive rock in line for me, but no, actually it keeps pushing this mainstream rock, which is good occasionally, but not what I wanted to listen to.

That's because it knows you really don't like Tom Waits, actually you like Tom Jones. You listen to the machine, machines are always right.

My friend approached me with this website:

http://www.pandora.com/

Some of you might know it, but this "machine" finds out what kind of music you like. It works this way: you put a favorite band of yours in it. It'll play one of their songs and analyse it. Then after it'll look for songs/bands that resemble the style you have chosen.

For example I of course typed in my favourite, Jethro Tull. To my suprise it started playing Black Satin Dancer, which has always been one of my favorites, yet not very Jethro Tull -ish as in what they usually do. Then the next song was some folk, so that meant that it was correct in analyzing it, because Jethro Tull has a lot of folk in it. After that folk song it came up with Genesis... I actually have all their albums in the shelf.

Let's see what's next: Skipped that and jumped into Kansas - Carry On Wayward Son. As it happens I have that album too. Then some Tull again And Peter Gabriel. After 5 only one song that I don't have on album, and this is rather good too I'm impressed. try it out.

Hi again. Here's the whole quintet, from the left, saxophone, piano, fatbass, piccolo, droms. Well they don't actually play jazz, but they all have a role in my mind.
Ã,  Just thought I'd show you the reference pics of these so that you could tell me what to do better

It doesn't look very stable. Or is it leaning to something? It meaning he

gee, thanks, it took me a whole 6 hours to draw it not to mention the text. lol

It's not healthy? bugger, after all this paper

I think, why we take off the peels off, is because they have chemicals in it THe thing about monkeys... I really have no idea. Are you sure there are no vitamins etc in them? It sounds like a waste. But really, I reckon, either of us eat the peels because they are hard to chew and taste bad.

yeah, he ate it already.

THe chemical. well I should have known. So if the banana doesn't taste bad when it's picked from a tree, why do monkeys take the peels off?

yes, I wish you wouldn't. Just, this doesn't have to be a life style as Mugs said. Don't say you found another forum somewhere :'(

Thought I'd make one myself: