"7. And most important, $750,000 in 100-dollar notes were found with him (a pittance for his captors who expected a $25m reward)â€" but no communications equipment of any kind, whether cell phone or even a carrier pigeon for contacting the outside world."
If the $750K was a pittance from the army to Saddam's captors, why would they even report its existence to the media, and moreover- why would the money still be in the Army's hands?

This doesn't disprove the overall captor theory. Afterall, it would be more plausible that the military paid its entire debt to the captors and that the 750k is simply a ploy to convince disbelievers that it actually is Saddam. But who's to say 750k isn't simply the severance pay for one of Saddam's doubles. Haha.
Besides what gives those supposed captors any more credibility of distinguishing Saddam from a double? I pose this only to Barcik, who appears to view that one quote to be hard evidence. Could not a double have been held captive just as easily as the real Saddam?
If the $750K was a pittance from the army to Saddam's captors, why would they even report its existence to the media, and moreover- why would the money still be in the Army's hands?

This doesn't disprove the overall captor theory. Afterall, it would be more plausible that the military paid its entire debt to the captors and that the 750k is simply a ploy to convince disbelievers that it actually is Saddam. But who's to say 750k isn't simply the severance pay for one of Saddam's doubles. Haha.
Besides what gives those supposed captors any more credibility of distinguishing Saddam from a double? I pose this only to Barcik, who appears to view that one quote to be hard evidence. Could not a double have been held captive just as easily as the real Saddam?