Category talk:AGS people: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Q|The problem with all these redirects from User: pages to articles, is that it makes it much harder for people to put messages in a user's user talk page, like this one. I think all these redirected pages should have a template in them that points to the user talk page, or better the redirect should go the OTHER way... --[[SSH]] 13:32, 21 November 2006 (CET)|SSH|[[Talk:monkey_05_06]]}} | |||
:{{Q|It seemed like it was the most common method of user page setup. I was just trying to make everything consistent. Perhaps this deserves some discussion (probably elsewhere) where the people in charge can put in their opinions and make a decision on this? [[Monkey 05 06]] 17:30, 21 November 2006 (CET)|monkey_05_06|[[Talk:monkey_05_06]]}} | |||
This seems like it'd probably be a good place for this discussion. Since ''most'' users already have the NAME page instead of the User:NAME page, I've tried (on a few occasions) to update all user pages to reflect this (by redirecting User:NAME pages to NAME pages where possible). SSH's concerns about the User talk:NAME pages led me to start redirected those pages to the Talk:NAME pages (today...more than 5 months later). In any case, I'm trying to set some type of standard. Perhaps new user pages could be set up with NAME pages and the User:NAME and User talk:NAME pages redirecting (as I've been working to do)? Unless someone has a different idea. But I'm already setting up the current user pages in this manner....[[User:Monkey 05 06|Monkey 05 06]] 00:50, 1 May 2007 (CEST) | |||
:well, this makes it hard for people to check whether their 'user talk:' has been changed, since its link in the top right corner won't be bold anymore. in contrast to (probably) popular opinion i'd keep 'user:' and 'username' pages separate. i certainly don't like people to mess with my [[User:Hajo]] page since it's for introducing myself, but i don't mind people editing [[Hajo]]. keeping those pages separate seems to be natural to me, one is 'your own' page, with which i can do whatever i want. the other is(well, could/should be) an article about you, written npov and is not owned by anyone. :) Hajo 02:43, 5 May 2007 (CEST) | |||
I agreed with Hajo, IMO the User: page is like a user profile, while the other is a wiki article, so the User: page is more "personal" stuff. That's why I protected my own [[User:Gilbert]] page from editting, while the [[Gilbert]] article page was free for editing. In fact these two pages did have different contents (nothing serious though)so I was actually not very happy when the article page was deleted (there wasn't much content though, so let it go) [[User:Gilbert|Gilbot]] 04:23, 8 May 2007 (CEST) | |||
---- | |||
Maybe we should throw in categories by country? E.g. "AGS people from Italy" etc. [[User:Radiant|Radiant]] 23:56, 7 December 2005 (CET) | Maybe we should throw in categories by country? E.g. "AGS people from Italy" etc. [[User:Radiant|Radiant]] 23:56, 7 December 2005 (CET) | ||