Category talk:AGS people: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
*>Monkey 05 06 No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This seems like it'd probably be a good place for this discussion. Since ''most'' users already have the NAME page instead of the User:NAME page, I've tried (on a few occasions) to update all user pages to reflect this (by redirecting User:NAME pages to NAME pages where possible). SSH's concerns about the User talk:NAME pages led me to start redirected those pages to the Talk:NAME pages (today...more than 5 months later). In any case, I'm trying to set some type of standard. Perhaps new user pages could be set up with NAME pages and the User:NAME and User talk:NAME pages redirecting (as I've been working to do)? Unless someone has a different idea. But I'm already setting up the current user pages in this manner....[[User:Monkey 05 06|Monkey 05 06]] 00:50, 1 May 2007 (CEST) | This seems like it'd probably be a good place for this discussion. Since ''most'' users already have the NAME page instead of the User:NAME page, I've tried (on a few occasions) to update all user pages to reflect this (by redirecting User:NAME pages to NAME pages where possible). SSH's concerns about the User talk:NAME pages led me to start redirected those pages to the Talk:NAME pages (today...more than 5 months later). In any case, I'm trying to set some type of standard. Perhaps new user pages could be set up with NAME pages and the User:NAME and User talk:NAME pages redirecting (as I've been working to do)? Unless someone has a different idea. But I'm already setting up the current user pages in this manner....[[User:Monkey 05 06|Monkey 05 06]] 00:50, 1 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
:well, this makes it hard for people to check whether their 'user talk:' has been changed, since its link in the top right corner won't be bold anymore. in contrast to (probably) popular opinion i'd keep 'user:' and 'username' pages separate. i certainly don't like people to mess with my [[User:Hajo]] page since it's for introducing myself, but i don't mind people editing [[Hajo]]. keeping those pages separate seems to be natural to me, one is 'your own' page, with which i can do whatever i want. the other is(well, could/should be) an article about you, written npov and is not owned by anyone. :) Hajo 02:43, 5 May 2007 (CEST) | |||
I agreed with Hajo, IMO the User: page is like a user profile, while the other is a wiki article, so the User: page is more "personal" stuff. That's why I protected my own [[User:Gilbert]] page from editting, while the [[Gilbert]] article page was free for editing. In fact these two pages did have different contents (nothing serious though)so I was actually not very happy when the article page was deleted (there wasn't much content though, so let it go) [[User:Gilbert|Gilbot]] 04:23, 8 May 2007 (CEST) | |||
---- | |||
Maybe we should throw in categories by country? E.g. "AGS people from Italy" etc. [[User:Radiant|Radiant]] 23:56, 7 December 2005 (CET) | Maybe we should throw in categories by country? E.g. "AGS people from Italy" etc. [[User:Radiant|Radiant]] 23:56, 7 December 2005 (CET) | ||