User talk:Gilbert/Archive: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
*>SSH mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Sorry, Gilbert, but you're arguments dont hold up and the more this discussion goes on, the more I agree with Radiant. It is good to establish a proper capitalisation policy so that one can work out what the title of a page should be from scratch. There are lots of unlinked stuff in the wiki already, so that is no reason for deleting things. Radiant has more experience than you in this: I suggest you let it drop! --[[User:SSH|SSH]] 15:30, 11 December 2005 (CET) | Sorry, Gilbert, but you're arguments dont hold up and the more this discussion goes on, the more I agree with Radiant. It is good to establish a proper capitalisation policy so that one can work out what the title of a page should be from scratch. There are lots of unlinked stuff in the wiki already, so that is no reason for deleting things. Radiant has more experience than you in this: I suggest you let it drop! --[[User:SSH|SSH]] 15:30, 11 December 2005 (CET) | ||
Please, don't argue on such a minor matter, like I wrote before, I have no problem with redirects, but if there're ''no mistakes'' in the original article name, there's no point to move it just to change the cases of it if ''it doesn't make things better'' (It's okay to change the cases if the original was ''really'' in ''improper'' capitalizations), giving alternate titles to articles (using redirects), however, is encouraged, given that the alternative names are sensible for naming the articles, and they helps in searching and/or referencing. -- [[User:Gilbert|Gilbot]] 02:12, 12 December 2005 (CET) | |||