User talk:Gilbert/Archive: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
No edit summary
*>SSH
mNo edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


Please, don't argue on such a minor matter, like I wrote before, I have no problem with redirects, but if there're ''no mistakes'' in the original article name, there's no point to move it just to change the cases of it if ''it doesn't make things better'' (It's okay to change the cases if the original was ''really'' in ''improper'' capitalizations), giving alternate titles to articles (using redirects), however, is encouraged, given that the alternative names are sensible for naming the articles, and they helps in searching and/or referencing. -- [[User:Gilbert|Gilbot]] 02:12, 12 December 2005 (CET)
Please, don't argue on such a minor matter, like I wrote before, I have no problem with redirects, but if there're ''no mistakes'' in the original article name, there's no point to move it just to change the cases of it if ''it doesn't make things better'' (It's okay to change the cases if the original was ''really'' in ''improper'' capitalizations), giving alternate titles to articles (using redirects), however, is encouraged, given that the alternative names are sensible for naming the articles, and they helps in searching and/or referencing. -- [[User:Gilbert|Gilbot]] 02:12, 12 December 2005 (CET)
I had let this drop, but I just found out that Gilbert's attitude to Radiant has made Radiant stop doing anything on the wiki at all. I think we lost a valuable contributor here. Surely if there's no point in moving something, there is also NO POINT MOVING IT BACK. Please, don't be an ass ons uch a minor matter. --[[User:SSH|SSH]] 17:14, 13 January 2006 (GMT)
Anonymous user