User talk:Gilbert/Archive: Difference between revisions

User talk:Gilbert/Archive (view source)

Revision as of 02:41, 14 January 2006

4 bytes removed , 14 January 2006

m

no edit summary

Gilbert

Administrators

521

edits

Revision as of 02:40, 14 January 2006 (view source) Gilbert (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:41, 14 January 2006 (view source) Gilbert (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:


	I think the inactivity of Radiant is not related to anything, since after the hype in creating stuff during the first weeks of launch of this Wiki, changes are slow on the whole now, and I don't have an attitude towards Radiant, really, he did make many valuable contributions here. I just have problem with changing stuff that are unnecessary, and there're points to change them back to tidy up the site as a whole, ''as long as it's still possible''. The AGS Wiki, in comparison to the Wikipedia, is tiny, so constant managements help keeping the information accessible and the site in shape, before it's expanded to a state that it's ~~not~~ impossible to manage anymore (like in Wikipedia, in practice no redirects should be removed because the site is now so complex that doing such changes can break A LOT of stuff). -- [[User:Gilbert\|Gilbot]] 02:40, 14 January 2006 (GMT)		I think the inactivity of Radiant is not related to anything, since after the hype in creating stuff during the first weeks of launch of this Wiki, changes are slow on the whole now, and I don't have an attitude towards Radiant, really, he did make many valuable contributions here. I just have problem with changing stuff that are unnecessary, and there're points to change them back to tidy up the site as a whole, ''as long as it's still possible''. The AGS Wiki, in comparison to the Wikipedia, is tiny, so constant managements help keeping the information accessible and the site in shape, before it's expanded to a state that it's impossible to manage anymore (like in Wikipedia, in practice no redirects should be removed because the site is now so complex that doing such changes can break A LOT of stuff). -- [[User:Gilbert\|Gilbot]] 02:40, 14 January 2006 (GMT)