hey guess what

Started by omgpreston, Sun 05/03/2006 17:09:01

Previous topic - Next topic

Nacho

Also, the video must explain the hijacking of 4 planes by a suicide squad of the US delta force, because I am pretty sure that all that "Mohammed Atta is alive! he phoned his dad!!!111" stuff is related with the "theory" that there was actually not a terrorist strike...
Are you guys ready? Let' s roll!

monkey0506

Hmmm...I never knew that Mulder played Santa Claus for the ninja children...

I honestly don't know what to believe about 9/11.  When it happened I was at school.  Our class took us from the middle school to the high school campus, and we were late getting back to the middle school, so I came into english class about 10 minutes late.  My teacher was reading something about a plane crashing into a building.  And then we did nothing in P.E....and everyone got picked up by their parents.  I had no idea why everyone was so freaked out.

Now...everyone hates Bush except my parents...who love him...and a few people who are completely neutral.  So I don't really know...though I find it interesting to read about.

biothlebop

Hell is like Tetris, make sure that you fit.

omgpreston

Quote from: MrColossal on Sun 05/03/2006 20:47:35
If the film answers these questions, please tell me it does and I'll watch it.

Just watch it you pussy. Its not going to hypnotize you. And I know you have the free time to, so don't even....

but anyway this movie is to make you question what happened, because the official report is bullshit and distorted. just tell me how a high rise building collapsed from a two story fire.
Drink up Joe, there are sober children in China

Darth Mandarb

Quote from: omgpreston on Sun 05/03/2006 23:12:12but anyway this movie is to make you question what happened, because the official report is bullshit and distorted. just tell me how a high rise building collapsed from a two story fire.

The heat of the fire(s) melted/weakened the support structures of the building to the point that the load bearing members were no longer strong enough to support the weight of the building above them.

Nacho

It's Ã, been explained severall times by people who is so much smarter than you, but if you want to believe a 12 minutes video, hey! I don't care... There are some other videos, like the "Roswell autopsy" (Just tell me how million of people have seen the UFOs and they can't be real, eh?!?)

Relax... Eric is not a pussy. He is probably the most reputated moderator, and not because we're a bunch of no-brain accollites who obbey the leader... But because he is respectable. He has proven to be smart and polite a million times here.

So, be careful when you call someone pussy.
Are you guys ready? Let' s roll!

Shane 'ProgZmax' Stevens

#26
Quote from: monkey_05_06Hmmm...I never knew that Mulder played Santa Claus for the ninja children...

You clearly missed the Christmas episode where Mulder had to save Santa from a Yakuza assassination attempt.

Quote from: FarlanderRelax... Eric is not a pussy. He is probably the most reputated moderator, and not because we're a bunch of no-brain accollites who obbey the leader... But because he is respectable. He has proven to be smart and polite a million times here.

What a shameless example of popular hero worship!  I mean, just because I don't have a cheesy 80's superhero nickname like 'Mr. SuperFantasticBigGuy' doesn't mean I'm any less respectable and worthy of your undying devotion! 

Really, Farlander, you cut me deep.



Nacho

You do have my respect, and not just because of the nick... ^_^
Are you guys ready? Let' s roll!

Kweepa

Quote from: MrColossal on Sun 05/03/2006 20:47:35
"To provide a pretext to invade countries in the middle east?"
Again, why?
That is a perfectly good reason in itself. You can answer "Why?" ad infinitum to anything, but that doesn't make it a good question.

Quote
I am not going to watch this new film but does it answer why the US government would place bombs in buildings they knew were going to be hit by terrorists and then let the strike happen, when one could build a case for war off of STOPPING that strike and presenting the evidence [or doctored evidence if you wanted to attack Iraq]?
We know that didn't happen. But perhaps it wouldn't be quite as convincing? There have been previous successful attacks (WTC, the Cole) that weren't "big" enough to change public opinion.

Quote
"I don't believe the conspiracies, but only because the administration seems too incompetent to pull it off."

That's the only reason you don't think the US blew up 2 buildings, let terrorists attack the US and killed thousands on Americans?
I was kidding. I don't believe the conspiracies.
However, they have shown themselves willing to lie to congress and the people to bring the country to "war" with Iraq, to send soldiers out there ill-equipped and without strategy, and to go on fund raising trips when they knew a major city might flood the next day and there wasn't a good rescue plan. So I wouldn't put too much past them.

Quote
Did they also kill all the demolitions experts that they hired to plan how to place the explosives inside the WTC? Then killed the people who placed those explosives? Then killed their families? Or are all these people just keeping quiet because the government paid them too?
Now those are good questions. "How?" rather than "Why?"

Quote
If the film answers these questions, please tell me it does and I'll watch it.
I don't know. I didn't watch it either.
Still waiting for Purity of the Surf II

MrColossal

Steve, what I mostly mean by "Why?" is that eventually you'll get to a point where you're making wilder and wilder conclusions as to why the US government would kill thousands of Americans.

And why me asking questions makes me a pussy is beyond me, maybe instead of trying to insult me you can answer my questions, omgpreston.
"This must be a good time to live in, since Eric bothers to stay here at all"-CJ also: ACHTUNG FRANZ!

Helm

Quote from: MrColossal on Mon 06/03/2006 01:25:17
Steve, what I mostly mean by "Why?" is that eventually you'll get to a point where you're making wilder and wilder conclusions as to why the US government would kill thousands of Americans.

You said 'why?' Steve explained 'for geopolitical power', and you said 'why?' again. That's like asking why human beings desire safety. Geopolitical power is an end in itself, it's an extension of the most basic instincts of control and power and cannot be scrutinized further on that scale. Countries serve their best interests because

I don't know much about this theory, but I have no trouble believing that if it ment enough power and resources and a solid footing in the middle east, the american goverment would lie to, and kill it's own citizents.
WINTERKILL

biothlebop

Quote from: SteveMcCrea on Mon 06/03/2006 00:35:26

However, they have shown themselves willing to lie to congress and the people to bring the country to "war" with Iraq

There is no such thing as a justified reason for war. Even when there was a insane scumbag like Hitler, countries ignored him until they were the next in line. Wars have no heroes or noble actions, only conflicts of interests. Bush is just a puppet for forces greater than the goverment and the congress. He just happens to be a nice scapegoat.
As long as you live as a part of society, you reap the benefits of wars and exploitation of others. I know I do. It is just easier to justify wars to people if they believe in right and wrong. And if they do, they deserve to be lied to.
Hell is like Tetris, make sure that you fit.

Las Naranjas

As Hitler and/or the Nazis have now entered this thread, I declare it useless.
"I'm a moron" - LGM
http://sylpher.com/novomestro
Your resident Novocastrian.

Gregjazz

Quote from: Darth Mandarb on Sun 05/03/2006 23:42:19
Quote from: omgpreston on Sun 05/03/2006 23:12:12but anyway this movie is to make you question what happened, because the official report is bullshit and distorted. just tell me how a high rise building collapsed from a two story fire.

The heat of the fire(s) melted/weakened the support structures of the building to the point that the load bearing members were no longer strong enough to support the weight of the building above them.

This is exactly true, especially in the Twin Towers case. Especially seeing that they supposedly short-changed the support of the building when they were creating it--though it was originally designed to withstand jet fuel burning temperatures.

However, they didn't make the same mistake when building the Pentagon, and the heat limit of the structural material was well over the heat of burning jet fuel... the Pentagon crash is much more of a controversy than the others in my opinion.

Whatever be the case, it's disturbing that we had so many direct warnings about this event before 9/11... finally up to the point where some officials were secretly told not to book any flights that particular day.

TheYak

One disturbing aspect of the 9/11 theories (to generalize versus summarizing all of them, Govt. v. Civilians) is that a remarkable portion of the population, myself included,  wouldn't be surprised if they had a semblance of truth.

In the PNAC document, there are many broad statements that have, more or less, predicted the actions of the US for the past several years.  It mentions needing to establish a base of operations in the middle east, probably best done by revisiting the Iraq/Saddam problem.  It mentions the "Evil" governments (as labeled by this administration) as being future threats.  It also declares that the best way to get the US populations to advocate such a move would be a catastrophic attack by a hostile regime. 

Do I believe the the US orchestrated the attack?  No.  Do I believe it took advantage of it, used people's fear and desire for reciprocation, to further their agenda.  Yep.   Our government has been, and is, crooked and cynical enough.  There's really no need to paint them as something worse to the extent of sounding like hyperbole.

bspeers

#35
The US government would never do anything wrong because they are angels made out of gold.

I don't mean to make this political or anything, I just have trouble imagining how angels made out of gold could orchestrate this level of deception, and why.  It's not as if the US has needed a reasonable justification for war in the past--just about anything will do--but you are asking me to believe that angels made out of gold did this?

First of all, it is highly unlikely that golden beings of any kind would be able to hire enough people and pay them off, considering their limited mobility and the likelyhood of them being dead.  It is hard to breathe when one's lungs are made out of gold.  Also, I think gold was the weakness of the cybermen or something, so even that is ruled out.  The only way I can imagine golden beings creating this elaborate a deception is if they were robots, and that's just science-fiction hooey.

Also, they're angels, lets not forget.  Angels always do what's right, even if it seems bad in the short-term.  Like murdering every last citizen of Soddem and Ghommorah.  I can't spell them because I have too much faith, btw.  So even if they did fake the crashes (with some sort of golden angel magic) it would have to be in the better interests of God.  Or Dick Cheny (Dick is God, which is why his heart is so bad, like in the Bible).

Also, the president of the gold angel children (they're also children, I forgot to mention that) of perfectdemocracyfairnesspowerland, who is also the best soccer player in the whole world would never allow Americans to die, as he did through slow response in New Orleans, or through beligerance in the continuing war in Iraq that even the majority of soldiers want to end.  Or by executing people.  Mostly because he is not alive (being made of gold) and an angel.

Also, I like freedom.

EDIT

I Forgot to mention that angels are neither alive or dead, being the scion of God (Cheney?) himself, so that just makes the problem more problemy.

EDIT EDIT

I just looked up "cat nunchucks" on google and there was nothing even remotely related!  Mostly nunchucks or a cat!  Maybe I should have looked up neko nunchuku.  Hang on, I'll just check that.

EDIT EDIT EDIT

Useless!  Sorry to move from the subject of this thread, but that is seriously some kind of social problem akin to this gold angel kerfuffle.  Kefuffle should be the name of someone's cat.  Here are some effective commentators on 911 and the problem with conspiracies  : http://www.zmag.org/content/Instructionals/shalalbcon.cfm  -- Please read the whole article, and also find some pictures of a cat with nunchucks so we can finally put this ugly time behind us.
I also really liked my old signature.

Alun

Quote from: bspeers on Tue 07/03/2006 06:26:31
Please read the whole article, and also find some pictures of a cat with nunchucks so we can finally put this ugly time behind us.

Does this count?:



(Found, incidentally, by googling cat nunchaku, singular.  See, you've just got to try all the combinations...)

Soup - The Comic Strip
http://www.soupcomic.com
Gods, heroes, monsters, and soup


Layabout

Quote from: omgpreston on Sun 05/03/2006 18:51:22
Quote from: Geoffkhan on Sun 05/03/2006 17:25:02
This is very old news, isn't it? I wrote a paper about all this 2-3 years ago... While we're on the topic, though, check this out:

http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/unanswered_questions_911.html

I like the 9/11 pre-warnings section. :)

yeah thats gnarly. I wish it was old news. This still might be effecting america, maybe just a little bit.

Whoa, you used the word Gnarly. I havent heard that word since 19 dickity 2... And your name is OMGPreston... how sad... I feel sorry for your friends... If you indeed have any.

I am Jean-Pierre.

LGM

Watch out, omgpreston. Layabout is an undercover agent coming to take you away. You know too much already!!

Run, dude! Run!
You. Me. Denny's.

MrColossal

Um bspeers... are you addressing me?
"This must be a good time to live in, since Eric bothers to stay here at all"-CJ also: ACHTUNG FRANZ!

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk