How do you know a Pablo is bored? - COMPETITION! = FAILURE!

Ubel · Wed 05/09/2007 21:28:35

...You see him building a 13 floors high card house. Which by the way is my new personal record. Go me!

I look quite tired there...

Also, you know what's mandatory after such an effort:

Kick the fucker down!

Gord10 · Wed 05/09/2007 21:36:33

*blows*

Tuomas · Wed 05/09/2007 21:37:53

Yeah, for that, I'll blow you too, anytime.

Radiant · Wed 05/09/2007 22:08:01

Wow, you finally found a use for magic cards!

Domino · Thu 06/09/2007 01:29:24

Instead of knocking it down, you should have BURNED it down. That would have been more dramatic.

Your friendly AGS forum member,
Domino

Stupot · Thu 06/09/2007 06:35:37

Sod picking them all up again.
Now I know what is meant by 'The Gathering'.

Shane 'ProgZmax' Stevens · Thu 06/09/2007 07:16:19

I thought flipping off the cards after kicking them was a nice touch.

Sam. · Thu 06/09/2007 08:16:23

Not only are the cards magic, Pablo is a wizard.

Stupot · Thu 06/09/2007 08:49:44

Also...

Hmmmmmmm indeed.

Tuomas · Thu 06/09/2007 09:47:12

nah, but that's just because he lives in a crooked house.

zabnat · Thu 06/09/2007 10:10:19

Quote from: Tuomas on Thu 06/09/2007 09:47:12
nah, but that's just because he lives in a crooked house.

He built it himself?

evenwolf · Thu 06/09/2007 10:10:58

Let's see you do it with the cards perpendicular to the rug.

Gilbert · Thu 06/09/2007 10:57:15

Zooty, I'm not sure, but I think it could be the angle that makes that card just perpendicular to the lens so you can only "see" the edge of the card.

Stupot, perspectivewise the shadow cast won't be the same size as the object, it depends on the light source, if the light source is directly perpendicular to the lens (say if a flash was used) the shadow would be just like a replica of the object's shape just behind it like that photo.

Anyway, I'd rather not question whether it's real or not, especially when I couldn't even stack one with 5 levels.

Stupot · Thu 06/09/2007 11:13:03

Quote from: Gilbot V7000a on Thu 06/09/2007 10:57:15
Stupot, perspectivewise the shadow cast won't be the same size as the object, it depends on the light source, if the light source is directly perpendicular to the lens (say if a flash was used) the shadow would be just like a replica of the object's shape just behind it like that photo.

Hmmmmmmmm

Ubel · Thu 06/09/2007 11:16:51

Hmmmmmmm indeed. If you're seriously doubting the reality of this I do have a lot more photos and an extra video file to show you...

space boy · Thu 06/09/2007 11:21:40

Zooty and Stupot: you have a point there. Now I'm convinced Pablo didnt build that... it was the government! Â¬Â¬

Stupot · Thu 06/09/2007 11:25:40

Hmmmmmmm...

...nah I'm just kidding

. I can see it's real. It's just that you've managed to capture a couple of interesting optical illusions that make it look doubtful. I'd see it as an even greater feat if you'd built it leaning against the wall... that would defy gravity... probably.

Tuomas · Thu 06/09/2007 13:01:59

Quote from: Pablo on Thu 06/09/2007 11:16:51
Hmmmmmmm indeed. If you're seriously doubting the reality of this I do have a lot more photos and an extra video file to show you...

Yeah, well, I've got pictures from inside the Pentagon too! I could show them, but you wouldn't believe me anyway.

evenwolf · Thu 06/09/2007 13:08:28

Nobody disputes the presence of glue in the photo!

Oliwerko · Thu 06/09/2007 13:15:08

Isn't glueing it all together more difficult than building it without a glue ?