Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Fee

#101
General Discussion / Re: British TV
Wed 02/05/2007 13:23:33
Some of the old British Comedy is pretty good. I used to love Allo Allo, classic show :D

I dont think much of Modern British TV, especially the crappy murder mysteries. I dont mind Dr Who, even the new ones are ok. Theres also a pretty funny show called Shameless.
#102
General Discussion / Re: lol, IRAN!
Mon 30/04/2007 10:01:31
Its just so they can recognise the "spys" more easily when War breaks out this summer :/

Iran is being demonised by Western Media more and more over the last year for the most rediculous shit.

#103
SD

I want people to have the RIGHT to do what they want within reason.
If 2 guys want to have sex, thats their decision, not "Gods", not some Church.

I believe people should be free to do what they want, as long as they arent harming other people.
I believe people should be abel to believe what they want, as long as they arent trying to force their beliefs on others.

This is the basis for law in any free society, unfortunatly some Governments cant stay out of other people business, and some laws restrict your freedom, but atleast they try and make a reson for it. Unlike the Church who expect people to live a certian way because some Non-Existant being said so, or some guy wrote about it 1800 years ago in a different society and time.

I know your going to tell me God Does exist.. to that i say PROVE it. There isnt even any real proof of a Historical Jesus, so good luck proving the existance of God.
#104
Having Faith about somthing when there is no evidence to prove its existance does not prove your devition to God. It mearly shows the rest of us how gullible or stupid you are.
I can understand people in poor countries with no education believing in "God" but why the hell do Educated people still insist in believeing?
I wouldnt have a problem with small community based chruches that promote family and help out the local communities, if it wasnt for the religious stuff that is.
Large international Churches are as bad as Large international Corperations. They have the same agenda, to keep us poor and sick so we look to them for help. To get rich at our expense. They want things to be like they were 500 years ago when the church basically had controll of entire countries or most of Europe.

If someone wants to believen in a particular Religion, i wont attempt to convince them otherwise. To do so would make me as bad as a Jehovas Witness or one of those other morons who go around attempting to recruit you. If they cant see the truth themselves, then i dont see much hope for them anyway.
#105
Demo Updated with the mostly finished Fight engine.

2 new Screnies




Not a great deal to do now. Just a few backgrounds, Adding the rest of the NPCs and Story really.

Im quiet busy lately, and my AGS skills stink, so release will still be a while off, probly in June :(

Fee

#106
I think ill adress who i want when i want!
#107
Helmz... you are the King of demeaning  Pedos :D  GJ.

Heres a quote from another thread that was directed at me just because i stated that being a noob sucks!

QuoteThis is one hell of a nice community, you should be thankful you're a part of it.

I thought this was a nice community too, untill i read through this thread. Now i realise theres alot of freaky cunts here... The rest of you seem fine tho :D

This is one of those things the Internet is making worse. Now we have a mass of Computer nerds who rarely leave their PCs, view all sorts of dodgy crap online and when they finally get away from the PC they have no skill at talking to girls thier own age and have to resort to attempting to seduce young girls. No longer are the Catholic Priests the biggest Pedophiles in the world, i fear its becoming Computer nerds, and being that there is alot more of them than priests, the world is in serious trrouble..

Fee



#108
General Discussion / Re: Spaff's party dress
Sun 22/04/2007 01:41:36
Looks like a typical Saturday Night out on the town :D
#109
I believe several teachers have been jailed for that recently. One even hooked back up with they guy after she was released. If he wasnt such an impressionable age at the time they were sleeping together, i doubt the would have go together after the jail.

Your 16 and you can look if you want, im 26 and can look all i want also. Difference is at 16, you can do somthing about it.

Its when I use my previous experience to get young girls into bed that i am doing the wrong thing.

Look at it like this..
Your 16. Probly in school with a part time job (if any) no car (or a small first car) and littel experience with girls.
Im 26 with a fill time job as an Engineer, nice V8 Falcon and ive had several partners of varing age.

Say you and I are competing for the same 16 year old girl...

You buy her a rose and some Chocolates.
I buy her a dozen roses, some designer chocolares, ballons, teddybears ect.

You pick her up from school in your mothers Hyundai.
I pick her up in my Hoted up Ford.

You struggle to find the correct words to tell her how you feel due to lack of experience.
I tell her how i feel and make it sound all romantic and how we were destened to be together.

You take her to McDonalds for a dinner date.
I take her to a 5 star restraunt.


Dispite the fact you are most likely suited to someone your own age and have expressed your desires to have some sort of relationship with this girl, she barely notices because I used my recources and experience to overwealm your efforts. Hardly fair is it?

If an "old man" (like me lol) is spoling a young girl rotten, lavishing attention and gifts ect on to her they are clearly using their experience and recources to take advantage of someone at an impressionable age.

Maybe i dont explain myself right, im not the best when it comes to reading and writing, but i think you should see what i mean. No i better go before i get into trrouble lol...

Fee
#110
I know there is a difference, but i doubt anyone will deny that if you want to date someone, theres a 99% chance you want to have sex with them. If you dont, id say your crazy :P

I see attractive looking teenage girls alot. On Wednesday Nights i teach a Kickboxing class to a group of 12 - 18 year olds, Most of them girls. Tho most of them are quiet nubile, theres no way i could take advantage. To me its just not right. If my 16 year old sister was dating a 26 year old guy, i would not be impressed and there would be a confrontation.

Every culture has its own idea of what is acceptable. 100 years ago it was not uncommon to see 12 year old girl, pregnant and married to 30+ year old guys. Especially in Isolated parts of the world. This changed and became unacceptable druing the 20th Century for western society atleast. Seems over the last 10 years, things have been going backwards in that respect :(

Fee

#111
Crazy.. I cant believe the ammount of people here that think its ok to date CHILDREN.

OK.. so teenagers maybe a littel more mature than they were 10 years ago when i was 16, but it makes no difference. They dont have enough experience to make life changing decisions like that.

Kids fooling around with Kids is acceptable, its called experimentation, but 20+ year olds dating / sleeping with 13 - 17 year olds is unacceptable. Not to mention you shouldnt even be hanging around with children this age when you are 25.. WHAT GIVES? :/

Im 26, My Girlfriend is 19. I love her, but even at 19 i feel like a bit of a seedy bastard to be hooking up with her. Doesnt help shes so small and skinny and looks like shes 15 - 16, especially when we get up and shes walking around in her PJs like now.

IMO, untill your 18 you should stay within 2 - or + years of you age group. Once your 18, your free to experiment with older people. When i was 22 my GF at the time was 40. Dam we had a lot of fun, but the age difference leads to ALOT or fights/misunderstandings over the most rediculous things.

25 year olds sleeping with 16 year olds verges on pedophilia, not to mention its Illegal in most countries. Im not saying you guys ARE pedophiles, but the situation is very worring.

Dissapointed
Fee
#112
That maybe the case if you are running an old sata board, but he shouldnt have to do anything. If the bios detects it, it should work. If the Bios dedtects it and hes got an old Operating system like 98 installed, he may need drivers.

Check you mother board manual. You may not be abel to run SATA and IDE togehter.
Drive jumper settings on the IDE drive if you are trying to run both.
Check the Bios settings for the SATA
Check the BIOS to see what the drives are detected as and weather they are Primary, secondary ect.
Check your Mother Board information. You may have to set the SATA drive to SATA1 insted of SATA2 (slower transfer speed on SATA1)


If you wish to keep your Operating System from the 80gig and boot from that, the 80 gigs settings shouldnt need changing, but it must be the Master or Cabel select and Plugged into IDE channel 0. If you can boot off this without the SATA connected, connect the SATA and try again to see if it works. If it doesnt, change the SATA drives jumper settings so its set to SATA1. Make sure the SATA drive is not set as Master in the BIOS. Also, you might wanna try turning Raid off.


If you want to boot of the SATA drive, set it to master, set the IDE to Master or Cabel select, CDrom to Slave or Cabel select and put them both on IDE chanel 1 with the IDE on the plug on the end of the cable, CD on the center one.
Boot of your Windows CD and run through installation.

Ive only built a few PCs with SATA drives sofar and IMO they are easier to get working than IDE, however geting them to work together can be a pain in the ass.

Fee
#113
General Discussion / Re: Lurkers
Wed 18/04/2007 07:45:29
Quote from: Raggit on Tue 17/04/2007 19:46:46
All I can say is I'm glad I joined when I did.  I'd hate to be a newbie joining today.
Quote from: Fatal Fury on Tue 17/04/2007 19:58:35
Being a newbie is awesome though. They are bombarded with tons of games to play. I'm still new here and been donwload lots of games. I now have over 60 and only beaten about 4 of those.

Being a noob sucks.. alot of the time Mods close threads insted of answering simple questions that could save the noob hours of stress. Its all very well to tell them to refer to the Manual, but when your completely new at this, the manual isnt of much use. I think its lost its Noob Friendlyness over they years.

Im a nub.. so i try help the other nubs who get shuned when i can. Tho myself being one of the dumbest noobs ever, not much i can do :(

Hello Lurkers :D
#114
Its probly WifFixerPro/WinAntivirusPro 2007 advertisment wich im getting constantly now.
Even tho im "protected" this keeps coming up. It keeps poping up and the changing the current page im on to its page.

Scans say im clean. The Symantec site says their protect against this threat but it doesnt even see it.
The Manual removal instrructions need updating as its not in the registry where they say it is.

Now i just boot up and first thing that pops up is "rundll32 cannot find qoppo.dll"
Maybe its time to install Mac OS on this PC :/








lol... NEVER!!
#115
Yeh in the past ive been fine. Even now with a fresh install and firewall running, Norton running, im getting false alerts about my router attemting to attack me, legit attacks are not being blocked, and theres a strage popup appearing now saying "your antivirtus is in effective, download me". Somthing Norton clearly should be blocking but doesnt and im yet to figure out exactly whats causing it.... I should never have run that online scan.
#116
Im making an RPG so i checked his out :D

There is a Cursor. Tho only the default walk one at the moment.

Hes got 6 rooms in the above style, one that has random encounters. Theres a fight interface with Sword. Magic, Health Pot and Mana Pot icons.

I think the idea of this thread is so he can get some help with art. This is just a Demo of his concept i guess :P

#117
MY BOYCOT OF SYMANTEC PRODUCTS!

Since the early days of my messing around woth PCs, when i owned an 8088 with 640k Ram, ive pretty much never gone without Norton Utilities installed. Every util came in handy at some stage or another and they never failed to do their jobs. For me, Norton Utils was one of the must have Applications for any PC user. Microsoft even made their own version of Speed Disk (Defrag) and Norton Disk Doctor (Scan Disk) and included it with DOS 6, maybe even DOS 5 i cant quiet remember, it was long ago :D

Norton Performed flawalessly untill around 1995 when the long filename system brought its popularity to a screaming halt untill the next version was released. I continued to use Nortons (Now Symantec) products with no problem. That was untill about 4 years ago. We were running a games server for a game called Helbreath. Making updates on a regular basis and having to compile and pack the client in such a way that hackers couldnt unpack it (well easily).

No sooner would i pack the client, NAV would report to me it was a virus and delete it. No matter what, with NAV 2003 there was no way to stop it from deleting a file i know for a fact isnt a virus. At this point i Stoped using Symantec products. Their quality seemed to be getting worse since Norton was sold to them and hell, there was other things avalible everywhere that did the same job.

Ever since ive used various differnt Antivirus and other utils by many other people / companies. 3 days ago just out of interest i decide to Run Symantecs online scan. 2 hrs later, it reports to me that i have 7 viruses. A fact i found strange since VET, AVG, Adaware and several other orpgrams failed to find them. 4 of them were packed Helbreath Clients ok easy enough, however 3 were reported as trojans.

Since im taking a nice long break from HB i thought screwit ill install full NAV 2007. I go and pay $90 for it and install it. Virus scan runs and guess what.. NO SIGN OF A VIRUS. Seems to me the online scan lied to me and i was duped into paying for NAV07.

Later that night u shutdown the PC. In the morning when i boot up, Norton springs to life and tells me "Koos.exe" is attempting to access the internet. I look in take manager, it doesnt exist. I search all files no sign of it. I google it and it informs me it is some sort of nasty ass Trojan so i set Norton to block it.

I attempt to browse the internet after i block it and guess what.. Norton cut off all internet access. I was unable to get it back. In hardware manager every network device had a yellow !  next to it as if the drivers are missing. So i set about reinstalling them. No help. I use system restore to go back a few days. No help. Eventually i crack the shits and uninstall Norton. My internet returns. HOWEVER i reboot and guess what... Blue screen and an instant reboot, PC wouldnt even go into safe mode.

Using a PreInstall Envoronment i boot up and backup all important stuff to a USB HDD.

Format, Reinstall Windows (with the network unpluged) First thing i install is Norton 2007. Then i activate the network and resinstall all my drivers ect. Everything seems fine. The PC has had no chancee in hell of coming into contact with a virus. But notran Now constantly reports that my PC is being attacked.. Where from?? MY ROUTER. It constantly issues popup messages stating my router is attacking my PC. So much so that attempting to run anything in full screen is impossible.. it always pops back to display the message and of course there seems to be no option to switch it off.

So in summary... I just paid $90 to have to format my HDD for no reson and to be told that my router is a hacker attemting to infultrate my system. Thanks alot. SCREW YOU SYMANTEC, you can Join EA on my boycot list for releasing such dodgy untested shit and not replying to my Emails.

Rant over :D

Fee
#118
General Discussion / Re: I need some help
Thu 12/04/2007 07:57:39
Same thing happened to me man, i know exactly how you feel. Unfortunatly you probly dont want to hear any of what i am about to say.

Fact is, once a cheater, always a cheater. If she was abel to lie and sneak around like that once. She can and will do it again. Especially if you just "let it slide". Remeber the old expression... "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me again, THEN IM A DUMBASS WHO DESERVED TO BE SCREWED OVER." Sorry about the bluntness there, but IMO thats how it is.

Personally, i would never trust her again. She must know there is consiqueces for her actions. If i was you, I wouldnt get back together with her id kick her ass out on the street without a cent and recruit my parents to help with the children whilst i get back on my feet. Then when you are ready find a real woman who deserves your love.

Love is a complicated emotion that makes people do and say stupid things. Right now you need a long break. Get away from her, surround yourself with friends and family that you trust. Talk to them about it since they know the both of you better than any Internet personality does. Hopefully after some time to think and talk with friends you will know what to do yourself.

As far as the kids go,  i think you are better off to split and cause some qucik pain for them than to provide them an example of a bad relationshsip that they will mostlikely follow when they come of age. Children learn their relationship skills from their parents. Last thing i would want for my 9 year old is the example that its ok to cheat. If you stay with her, this is the example you set.

Trust me, it will not be easy and you WILL want to go back with her because thats what love does to you, but if you hold out and keep it together long enough, you will return to being the happy individual you once were. Took me over a year to get over it properly , but now im happier than i ever was and im clearly better off. We both have new partners and are great friends :D

You have hard times ahead of you, but you WILL recover.

Good Luck man
Fee



#119
Critics' Lounge / Re: theme song
Tue 10/04/2007 14:27:07
Its more of the kind of think id expect to hear in a slightly spooky room of a game. I wouldnt want to hear it as a theme song.

#120
Why would you want to click up there to walk on the path?

Id say the reason he doesnt move is because you are clicking nowhere near a walkable area. You can click outside a walkable area, and the character will try get there if its close enough i think. The reason also in your first post is basically the same. He stops at that point because that is the closest point to a walkable area.

Like i said before im new at this so i could be mistaken. But that seems pretty logical to me. :P
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk