Messages

I embedded a picture of the notes to the first post. Hopefully that cleared it up a bit.

Of course you can. No limits there.

Yeah you can use only one instrument from only one tune. That is the bare minimum.

Next: It's all backwards... but I don't mind

In remixing the author can do whatever he pleases with the original work. So you can add whatever stuff you want to make it your own and use any parts of the two songs that you like and discard the rest. The tunes i supplied are mostly meant as a starting point from where you can head off to any direction. You can make anything from tango to techno. Whatever suits your fancy. Just some parts of the original work has to be in some form in the final piece or otherwise it's not remixing.

[Added couple of small additional tunes for variety:]

Sorry for the delay. As a compensation I cut few days off the comp.
------------------------------------------

It's time for:




So Justin Timbersea is in trouble again. He's coming up with nonsensical little tunes that will get him nowhere on the charts. Your boss calls you up and says he and Justin need your skills to turn these melodies and beats into something everybody wants to listen. Your boss says it doesnt matter which parts of which song you use. Just make it sound good. He then sends couple of clips for you to analyze and break apart:

Tune nro 1: Click
Tune nro 2: Click

Added couple of small additional tunes for variety:

Tune nro 3: Click
Tune nro 4: Click


Individual sample wav's of songs:

Tune nro1 (15mb rar-file): Tune nro1-sample package
Tune nro2 (17mb rar-file): Tune nro2-sample package
Tune 3 and 4 (6mb rarfile): Tune nro3 and 4-sample package

INFO

Tunes 1 - 3 are 104 bpm and the samples contain one or couple of instruments throughout the whole song (length range from 20 sec - 1 min)
Tune 4 is 140 bpm. Tunes 3 and 4 are missing drums in the sample package because I used a template and cannot be distributed.

RULES

1. You have to use atleast one of the melodic instruments for atleast a bar (4 beats). (This doesn't mean it has to be continuos. You can use two times 2 beats of a clip and so on)
2. You can add as many additional instruments as you please. The tunes are meant to act as a starting point for your own tune.
3. The song should be atleast 0:45 long but no more than 3:00.
4. You should have fun while doing this.

Bonus points for production quality and creativity as in the more you incorporate the samples with a new twist.

If there's any questions or suggestions fire away.

Trophies for the winners:

   

EDIT: Typos and added rule number 2 to clarify things.
EDIT2: Added couple of additional tunes to help you create.
EDIT3: Tune4 notes are following (the arpeggio in green and bass in dark grey. The arpeggio just jumps an octave up every now and again):

Thanks man!   
Good work people!
I'll try to start the next one as soon as possible. Probably tomorrow.

I made slight differences for you to reference if this would be the direction to take the poster to:

I used sort of a bloomish effect to make it more fantasy-like, also used gradient to affect the colors a bit and burnt the colors under pier and center of hills. The effects touch a bit on the texts as I didn't have the layers. Take out of it what you want... or not. 

Famous viking Björn Redbeard who saw a glimpse of the famous Valhalla's bright night lights.

I guess I'll get this thing started.

PixelPerfect - When The World Ends

I guess if in a game this would propably have to be a cinematic sequence.
Something along these lines could happen:

build-up
something dear is lost or destroyed
something new is born or survival is a miracle
a different future is here with a longing to things lost

Thanks to everybody who voted! With your help we came close to the top in our own national category. 
Unfortunately the judges didn't seem to share our views and didn't pick Mariel for the top 50.  :'(

Mariel is indeed single at the moment and the song playing near the end is a slightly modified excerpt from Gojira - Toxic Garbage Island.

Anyway thanks again!

Thanks a lot Nikolas! 

My very good friend send her video application to "Best job in the world" -thingy and if you guys have a minute to spare please watch her video and give a good rating. In the video you can see a home green screen in action with some added effects. 

Link to video here

Well I thought boojiboy's piece was pretty good and I was just waiting for the competition starter to voice his opinions. I guess it's pretty clear now that we can't trust for him to come back any time soon so I would like to declare this as a draw between me and boojiboy, if it's okay.

The next competition starter could be any which one of the two of us. If boojiboy has a good idea and wants to do it, I'm all for it. I have pretty much on my plate right now so it would be convinient for me if boojiboy took the rains.

And I do like your piece a lot boojiboy... It could use a little more modern samples/instruments (to my ear) but apart from that it's perfect ambience piece I would gladly hear, say, in star control 2 or the likes. Good job, buddy!

Yeah the site where the song is hosted have been clitchy for the past couple days. It was propably due to the new version they were updating it to. Other than that it's top notch service at box.net. I highly recommend it.

Thanks for the positive comments! 

Yeah you might be right about middle being a bit too empty. I'll try some different things as per your suggestion and post if I can make it work better. Maybe I'll even try to expand on this and mix it up a little more.

Or something to that effect.

Give feedback if you hear something terribly off skew. Particularly if you can give any hints about mastering this better. Does this piece sound mastered to you at all and/or very top/bottom heavy. Things like that.

This is my first with an actual midi keyboard so I went mildly wild with the modulations. The actual melody doesn't change much in the course of the song. I realized pretty soon that those damn knobs and sliders are a lifesaver when automating your stuff.

Here's the jist:
PixelPerfect - SpaceFloat

I guess it's ok to ask crits about comp pieces? 

Oh and if anybody wants info on Axiom 61 I'll be glad to serve.

Space age... the final frontier...

I don't even know what Space Age Music means. Maybe that's because we aren't there yet. Or are we?

Anyways... Here's an entry by yours truly:

PixelPerfect - SpaceFloat

I agree 100% that the choice to consumer should be made easier than to make him/her plow through pages of guidelines and regulations in order to make an educated decision about a few food items. Good to know UK has things going good over there.

Maybe people in other countries would care more as in make the "right" decision if the "free range" was thoroughly enforced with inspections and the review would be publicly available (so you could count on it) and there were one of two different stickers on the box depending. "free range" text or "battery" text. Only problem is that people in charge usually try to play nice and go with the money making rather than public good.

You have your heart in the right place and it's good to know that not all of us are so absorbed by ourselves as most of us are.

Only way a consumer is really going to know how his/her food is grown/bred is to visit the farm producing the goods, and even then the farm is subject to change due time. Of course we don't have time to visit farmers in this day and age unless we're on Top Chef. That's why reasonable laws towards both the consumer and farmer should be placed to ensure the sanitary aspect of food. I think the sanitary aspect is coming ever more important as it's quite obvious that every company - whether daycare, your doctor or the meat processing plant - in the whole world is trying to cut corners in wherever they can if it turns profit.

Meowster: I'm not entirely sure about this, but if I recall right, the "free range" label doesn't have any real value in it. You can pretty much stick it in your product and you're good to go. At least in some countries from where the producer then can export to other countries. Just a recollection so I could be wrong about this one.

Have you thought about writing to a congressman/what have you? Legislation is pretty much the only effective way to make a change these days. Wearing a slogan t-shirt and pointing fingers is only a sure way to get ridiculed. Also it wouldn't hurt to know all the details other than few youtube clips and PETA leaflets and come up with more solutions than to just "change brands", "vote with your wallet" or "stop eating meat". The sanitary approach would be a whole lot more sane and approachable by the average person than the chicken have feelings too one.

I myself would want to enforce laws and practices that would produce only clean food. That's the only thing that matters to me personally, but I wouldn't mind finding some other answers to things like debeaking and other cruel-seeming methods. Somebody should just innovate as efficient methods for the problems farmers face everyday without it costing a fortune.

Food for thought:

shoppers duped with 500 million 'free-range' fakes
Organic food scams

5. Is it true that a lot of "free-range" eggs are from birds that are really being raised in confinement?

Yep, it's true, all right. All the "official" free-range systems that I've come across are scams, at least by my standards. This includes both the totally unconvincing U.S. free-range egg producers, and the "Let's give our scam a governmental seal of approval" EU system.

My test for a free-range system being "real" goes like this: If you move all the feeders and waterers outside, do any chickens die of hunger or thirst? Obviously, in a true free-range system, where all the chickens wander in and out of the building all day, it doesn't really matter if the feeders and waterers are indoor or outdoors. They'll be fine either way.

But in fake free range, the goal is to run a factory-farm operation while getting a price premium for the "free-range" label. The best way of doing this is to discourage the chickens from going outside, through the use of doors that are too few or too small, and by other methods. If only a handful of chickens actually go outside, you've really got a confinement operation, and can run it like any other factory farm. But if most of the chickens never go outside, if you moved the feeders and waterers outdoors, many of the chickens would die.

Here's how you do this: Chickens can recognize about 100 other chickens, and hang out with the ones they know. If they have to go past a lot of strangers to get outside, they won't go outside. So all it takes is a long walk past other chickens, and they'll never even try to go out the door. Given the immense size of modern chicken houses, this problem is almost insurmountable. You have to use more and smaller houses if you want to do it right. This, plus the other sources of increased labor in real free range, makes real free-range eggs very expensive to produce. I guess consumers prefer scam eggs to the more expensive real ones.

The same situation is true to an even larger degree with free-range broilers, since meat birds have been bred for lethargy, and are less willing to trek long distances to reach an outside door.

Above quote is from http://www.plamondon.com/faq_myths.html