Branagh's Hamlet was terrible. The whole thing felt like they were saying the soemtimes hard-toget-as-its-in-16th-centure-English dialogue as quickly as possible to stop the film being 8 hours long. I agree that if they'd taken advantage of cinemtic technique more they could have made a picture worth 1000 words, even if the words were those of the bard.
On the other hand, Branagh's Much Ado was a great adaptation. Esepcially when you consider how rubbish most Shakespearian comedy comes out on film (e.g. Midsummer Night's dream, Tweflth Night). The taming of the Shrew is probably the only other Sheky comedy I can think of thats been done well. But then when the comedy relies on such things as a woman (originally played by a man) disguised as a man, you're in trouble no matter how good your adpatation is...
Interestingly, there are plenty of films that put Romeo and Juliet, Shrew and Othello in a modern setting, perhaps becuase everyone lieks a good love story, but there's not many modernised adaptations of the other stories. Perhaps becuase its hard to find an equivalent to the affairs of kings which feature in so many Shakey plays. Gandalf's Richard III solved the problem by making him a Nazi dictator figure.
And Stephen King books tend to lend themselves to rubbish adaptations, somehow. There's been a few good ones, mainly where the directors have focussed on the characters rather than the supernatural elements
On the other hand, Branagh's Much Ado was a great adaptation. Esepcially when you consider how rubbish most Shakespearian comedy comes out on film (e.g. Midsummer Night's dream, Tweflth Night). The taming of the Shrew is probably the only other Sheky comedy I can think of thats been done well. But then when the comedy relies on such things as a woman (originally played by a man) disguised as a man, you're in trouble no matter how good your adpatation is...
Interestingly, there are plenty of films that put Romeo and Juliet, Shrew and Othello in a modern setting, perhaps becuase everyone lieks a good love story, but there's not many modernised adaptations of the other stories. Perhaps becuase its hard to find an equivalent to the affairs of kings which feature in so many Shakey plays. Gandalf's Richard III solved the problem by making him a Nazi dictator figure.
And Stephen King books tend to lend themselves to rubbish adaptations, somehow. There's been a few good ones, mainly where the directors have focussed on the characters rather than the supernatural elements