It seems like a good system, but yes, it will take a bit of time for the results to make any sort of sense.
but on the other hand, I can still see it being some what similar to the old system, where if someone doesn't like a game (or person) the results will be a bit off (which in turn might influence other peoples decisions on their submissions.
Just an example of what I mean, If you notice not many games have got enough votes yet, But Flasbax & Who wants to live forever, already have percentages (and fairly low ones) I guess people are already being spiteful, even though both games probably are better than the marks they've got so far. (obviously this is just my opinion)
(on the other hand, a lot of the classics have got really high marks, even though when it comes to reality, it is other biases pushing them up, as compared to some more recent games, they are pretty ordinary.)
I supose only time will tell, but as the stats showed before that there were a lot of "1" & "10" votes, I think people will still try to adjust the percentages (not by giving the votes they think it deserves, but if it is higher than they think it should be they will be harsh, and vice versa)
It would probably help a lot if it were people outside this community voting, but I guess a lot of the percentage of people playing them are from within, and the others probably don't even know where they got the game anyway.
Anyway, it's just opinions, At least the system is now more complex, so people might think a little bit more, we can only hope.
but on the other hand, I can still see it being some what similar to the old system, where if someone doesn't like a game (or person) the results will be a bit off (which in turn might influence other peoples decisions on their submissions.
Just an example of what I mean, If you notice not many games have got enough votes yet, But Flasbax & Who wants to live forever, already have percentages (and fairly low ones) I guess people are already being spiteful, even though both games probably are better than the marks they've got so far. (obviously this is just my opinion)
(on the other hand, a lot of the classics have got really high marks, even though when it comes to reality, it is other biases pushing them up, as compared to some more recent games, they are pretty ordinary.)
I supose only time will tell, but as the stats showed before that there were a lot of "1" & "10" votes, I think people will still try to adjust the percentages (not by giving the votes they think it deserves, but if it is higher than they think it should be they will be harsh, and vice versa)
It would probably help a lot if it were people outside this community voting, but I guess a lot of the percentage of people playing them are from within, and the others probably don't even know where they got the game anyway.
Anyway, it's just opinions, At least the system is now more complex, so people might think a little bit more, we can only hope.