Edit: After making this post, I began wondering if I might have violated a forum rule regarding sequential posting. I checked, and I am in violation. Looks like Snarky will be contacting me, along with the lawyers for one game developer and several actors, with a few photographers thrown in for variety. Sorry folks. It should not happen again. I'm also changing the image I'd put in this post with a later one along the same lines.
I don't know. I'm still concerned, particularly after looking at Eric's and calicoreverie's posts. I cobbled this together using both FaceShop and MakeHuman.

Worked, but won't stand up to close inspection. The censoring was an attempt at humor.
In the hands of someone who actually knew what they were doing, seems this stuff would be likely to get a person in trouble.
Quote from: Andail on Tue 23/07/2013 23:50:21
Regarding copyright:
If you just use the photograph as a loose reference, there's no copyright infringement to speak of (virtually impossible to notice, literally impossible to prove).
If you just manipulate it a little, or reproduce it very faithfully so that we're talking a derivative work, you have infringed the copyright, but there's no chance in hell anyone would notice it, much less care. Unless perhaps it's a really unique and famous photo, and it's very obvious that you've stolen it, and you're making lots of money of it. Then maybe you've got a problem.
I don't know. I'm still concerned, particularly after looking at Eric's and calicoreverie's posts. I cobbled this together using both FaceShop and MakeHuman.

Worked, but won't stand up to close inspection. The censoring was an attempt at humor.
In the hands of someone who actually knew what they were doing, seems this stuff would be likely to get a person in trouble.