Messages

This is my theory.

The moon landings were faked.
They were filmed at area 51.
The US government crashed an aircraft in Roswell, made it look like they were trying to cover it up so that all the conspiracy theorists concentrated on alien cover-up theories.
The Government took the aircraft and the so called alien and made the fake autopsy video to further feed the gullible conspiracy theorists.
This is why everyone thinks Area 51 is where the body of the alien is and the ufo and thats why it's a secret area.
But the real reason area 51 is cordoned off is because that is where they filmed the moon landings.

The whole alien cover-up was itself a cover-up to hide the true reason for Area 51.

Anyone else buy this... I've long thought the moon landings were faked and when I stopped believing in Aliens coming to Earth in flying saucers I realised the two conspiracy theories could be linked.

Yeah that makes sense... faking an alien spacecraft in 1946 to hide some filmation locations that were going to be used in 1969... the US government has clarividence powers!

Someone said before, but I think that it' s necessary to remark it, because it works: Having dinner soon is very good, awakening up with hungry is ok (Remember to have breakfast, eh? It' s necessary to start your day with energies).

Remove your daily "auto-pleasure". Look at that donut, or that cheese cake calories profile. It can probably have 400 or 500 Kcals, if you don' t like sport, avoid that meal and save 1/2 hour of footing.

But, IMO, it's better to do a lot of sport and enjoy of this little pleasures

@ Prog.

Oh, come on... "Excuse me if I don' t stand up" (In Grouxo Marx' s gravestone). Maybe he was not dying, but he developed the idea, during hir long and healthy life, to leave this world with a joke.

Andy Kauffman was able to create the legend during his cancer that all was a prank and that he will come back in ten years (Actually an impersonator came saying he was Andy, dunno if he did with Andy' s permission before his death or not...)

Also, one of the most terrible theories about "Roswell" (Not saying that I believe it...) say that bodies of captured japanese soldiers were used shortly after the war to see the effects of heights in human bodies (using balloons). So, imagine a couple of small, bad feed, shaved japanese soldiers thrown by a high height by accident... Might those bodies resemble to a "grey alien"? IMO, yes, they do. Who can deny that maybe that "deathbed confessor" confussed alien bodies with captured soldiers? That confession has not value at all for me, sorry.

I think you don't really believe in the Roswell accident, because you said "interesting" better than "That's a big evidence!!!", so, read this as a "low profile" post. No hard feelings. 

Interesting, Greg.  Deathbed confessions (if this can be verified to be true) are usually fairly reliable.  I mean you're going to die so why lie?  It's not like he can take fame with him.

Not really... You can allways leave this world with a final joke...

It was a case that was not even believed by the mistery raiders in those days... It became famous when a jerk wrote a book in the eighties. 0 reliebility... well... Like all the UFO issues.

I mean... let' s be serious. Imagine you have a space ship which can cover 15 or 20 light year distances... Why the hell would you put flashy yellow position lights on it?

Would you travel for 15 or 20 years just for scaring a peasant in the middle of Russia?

All this UFO thing is so rediculous... If you know a bit of it, you must know that all the "UFO legends" (Sightings-crashes-abductions and conspiracy) were created less than a year after Arnold' s incident. It's like a thriller were all the action happens in the first 5 minutes, all the rest is really, really boring.

I think you should ask the moderatos to make a sticky thread for you, so you could ask solve your weekly existencial doubt without hijacking the first topic place  in gen gen... 

I don' t really get it... There are some flaws from the point of view of isometric rules, but you say you are aware... Why don' t you publish your finished work in the first step? You say there are shape problems... do you want us to point them, or not?

I would also advice to do some easy things, like doing the corners in a lighter colour, like in the gif (image 6, for instance):



But I don' t want if you want this to be criticised or not... I would recommend to re-phrase your post, my friend.

I feel better now Radiowaves. I don' t think you meant what you wrote... But you didn' t say "The Western governs are the terrorists" or "Bush, Blain and Aznar are the terrorist" you said "maybe The western countries are the real terrorists" Be carefull, man. I think nobody here wrote "Muslims are terrorists" or "Islam is an assassin religion". Why that "care" we use to talk about "them" is never applied when we talk about "us"?

On the other side, the thing that annoyed me most was:

[Western and Northern forces should leave Middle East and Afghanistan alone and let them deal with their own problems.

What do you mean with "leave them to deal with their problems"? If you mean no military actions I might agree, but no because a terrorist blowing the WTC has taken my attention to the problem... I would agree per se, because wars are bad.

But what terrorists demmand is not that. Then don' t demmand us to take the tanks out of there (Actually Bin Laden told that the day the Afghanistar war started it was the happiest day in his life). What they demmand is "To take out any westers influence of the lands of the Islam".

Ok... so, do you want to condemn 99.9999 % of the muslims who do not agree with Bin Laden to renounce to:

Internet
Playboy
Planes
Gunpowder
Computers
Ipods
Televisions
Cars
FACILITIES TO EXTRACT PETROL,
etc...?

I have some muslims friends, you know? And I wouldn' t like to isolate them of the rest of the world because a jerk in the mountains of Tora Bora thinks that is what Quran says.

And you should stop repeating the manifesto. It' s old fashioned and nobody swallows it. The West is not exploding "the Arabs" or "Latin America" or "Asia". The countries which best level of life are those who open their bourdaries to the world and accept the laws of free market. Compare Santo Domingo (Capitalist) and Haiti (Socialist). Hong Kong and China. North and South Korea. Compare Qatar and Iraq. Compare Iraq and Iran now, and before the socialistic dictadures of Saddam and the Religious dictadure of the Ajatollahs with the "before", when Iraq and Iran were "with us", and not "without". If someone is "consuming", the resources of the third world are the left dictators who place their countries in front of the "West" as an excuse in front of their people to hide their own corruption. Have in mind that Castro is one of the biggest fortunes of the world, like Arafat was, Sani Abacha, Lukashenko, Kim Jon Il, etc... How nice is to yell "They are the terrorists! They are the ones who are killing is by famine!!!" to the masses when you have billions of dollars in Switzerland of the Cayman Islands, eh? I would be communist that way, also... How nice is to tell "Maybe the West are the terrorists" comfortably seated in Estonia, far away from Spain, which has pointed by Al-Qaeda as primary objective to recover by the Islam, as the old "Al-Andalus"! How easy is to talk without thinking!

and Ikari... That' s not ridiculous.... Because Radiowaves didn' t wrote "Bush is a terrorist". He wrote "The West is the real terrorist". So, read their post again, and then post again.

That's better... Radiowaves. Look at the pic... Now you know what you make me feel... 

No no... that are leaps sealed. --->

I want an emoticon for expresing how sick makes me feel that my friend Angélica, killed in Madrid in 3/11, is the real terrorist, and not Bin Laden.



Radiowaves, you are despicable.

Western and Northern countries should look up to themsleves to see who the real terrorists are.

I demmand a smiley for expressing vomit.

Caption away!

Oh, I see that the legend that "Brits don' t wash their teeth" is true...

This guy is asking for a spanish professional wintermute coder... Dunno if he really thinks he is going to find one, here, or he is simply trying to be annoying... 

I was, for reference, joking in my previous post.

Humour is allways good! 

Preciselly, Petter...  Some years ago it was "Globar warming". Now it is "Climate change". They had to change the name of the "catastrophe" because reality just doesn' t match with the reality... Rains and cold in summer, polar fronts (Specially funny were those which followed Al Gore when he was giving speeches about "global warming"). It was silly to call it "warming".

Climate changes exists. Earth was cooler (yes, cooler) In the middle age. It was colder in the end of the XVIIIth century (There was a big famine in Europe during the beginning of the XIXth because there was a "year without summer", ergo, no harvests...  ) That period is even called "small ice age".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer

Also, notice the graph. There are severall lines because there are several theories. Which one do we believe? What I see is that weather is quite caothic. What I see as well is that there are some people (I don' t know which are their intentions) who try to fool us (Notice the big black line at the end, representing a severe warming in the latest 20 years... The other lines don' t do that... Who put that there, and why?)

So, have a critic and skeptic mind... I recommend this book, for not swallowing only the yellow press headlines when talking about climate change.

[link]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Skeptical_Environmentalist[/img]

And take care for nature... Actually taking care of it... Not just posting in threads about it and complaining... It' s in our hands.

[for certain]

I argue that you can't possibly know for certain that Bush wasn't there to drop CO2.  I contend that he stole H.G. Wells' time machine and used it to cause the Ice Age for fun and profit (fossilized bones = petroleum!).

That' s one of the most absurd arguments I' ve ever read. That machine had two positions (One for going to the future, and other for going to the past). Too complicate for George W.

Volcanoes activity it' s not constant, and some scientists say that these variations cause the different temperature eras. I think that there was a time when the Earth was a block of ice (Seen Ice Age and Ice Age 2   ) And it moved to tropical... and then to Ice era again... And then tropical... And Bush was not there to drop C02 and pollution to the air, I think... 

It is easy... Volcanoes drop more C02 than all the human activity together. 500 times more.

Your opinion about global warming are like a Roschard Test. There are good reports from both sides, so, you pick deppending on "which is your side". I have read some very good reports de-mithyfying the very well known "hockey stick" graph, proven to be made with uncorrect statistic tecniques. The new "official" graph, based on the rings of the trees, shows a caothic temperature graph, with little glacial eras in the beginning of the XIX century and a hot period on the middle age. Apparently the Industriall revolution has not much to see... Also, C02 emissions are being redouced.

Temperature changes in earth, that' s for sure. The photos of the glaciars are there. Now we must decide if we have something to see. Human C02 emissions are 0.2% of the total amount, natural sources as volcanos are much important. Same with petrol natural emissions compared with taker accidents... It is important to care the nature, but it is also important not to swallow everything the propaganda says, and having a critic mind. Temperature has changed before we were here, no?

Specially if those reports come from a group of musicians who go to the "Live Earth" concert in jets, droping in a journey more C02 to the athmosphere that Afganistan does in a year. Specially if those reports come from a man whose house consumes more energy in a month than a whole family in a year. Specially if that "person" is paid 250,000 $ in every speech he says. Specially if that "person" has been 8 years in white house, and did nothing when he had the opportunity.

I am for ecology. I never drop rubbish in the forrest (well, only organical, such as banana or orange peel) I use public transport, try to use the flush as less as I can, and I don' t have a pet (Because Amazonas is being de-forested for making cheap grass fields for feeding the cows that are going to be in the "Cat-Chow" cans) I don't use the air conditioning and I save energy as much as I can... But I am not going to follow a band of billionare hypocrits just because it' s fashioned, sorry. Not saying you all AGSers do that, but much people do.

Do I hate smoke filled rooms and smoker's cough and the smell and all that of smoking? Yes, but that means nothing in regards to what other human beings do WITH THEIR BODIES.

Smoking only annoys me because smoke moves out the bourdary of the body of the smoker jumping into the bodies of non-smokers. Thing that alcohol, heart attacks for marathon runners, or not sleeping enough doesn't do.

Smoking is not a "normal" vicious that only affects the person with the vicious. If you drink, you can get pissed till fainting without molesting anyone. Smoking is more like shouting aloud. It annoys lots of people in a radio of 2/5 meters... and the worst of it is that the "annoy" is still there after the person with the "vicious" is away! I see differences between this "bad habit" and some others.