1) Kari Byron is hotter in the episodes than in those photos... I can' t understand why she has been un-sexied in a sexy photo shoot.
2) Extraordinary claims do need extraordinary evidences. That a man walked in the moon is an extraordinary claim. Do we have extraordinary evidences to support that? Yeah... Videos, witnesses, moon rocks, million of emplyees working in the project who never confessed... We went to the moon: The extraordinary claim now is to say we DIDN'T went to the moon. Is that claim supported by extraordinary evidences? Let' s see...
The "conspiranoia" was started with a book called "We never want to the moon", by Bill Kaysing. He claims to have worked for the NASA.
Let' s examinate this with an example:
If a man tells me that he was a mechanic of the Ferrari Formula 1 Scuderia and that all Michael Schumacher' s victories were a hoax, that he had some kind of "auto-pilot device", I might be inclined to believe him, since he was there and he could know about what he was telling; But... what about if he worked in the 80ies for an enterprise that would finally do screws for FIAT, before the Schumacher era, in spite of working in the Ferrari Formula 1 Scuderia? Would you believe him?
That' s what happens with Kaysing: He never worked for Nasa... He was a SPOKESMAN of an enterprise (Rocketdyne) that was doing components for the NASA. he abandoned the enterprise before the enterprise started working on the Saturn...
What does his book say? It' s a 87-page silly book with dozens of pics, photocopies, none of them related with the moon... Some of them include ladies in bikini, with claims like:
"The Nevada desert was chosen to film the hoaxes because there were a lot of nice girls and Casinos in Las Vegas, ideal for the pilots to relax after the missions"
So, according to Kaysing, Armstrong went to the "studio", filmed the hoax, and then went to "The Miracle" to play some hands of poker... Ok...
Some other "claims" by Kaysing include the assessination of the three astronauts in Apollo 1 because "They were going to tell the world the truth" Ok... That means that:
a)The Nasa knew they knew they were not going to arrive to the moon since the start of the project.
b)Grissom and the others knew about the hoax, were going to confess, but they agreed to participate on it. A bit contradictory.
Most of the other "evidences" come, surprisingly, from the arsenal of Nasa Footage... Those claims are very well known and have been already debunked.
And of course, the biggest evidence for WE DID GO TO THE MOON. Russians, the most interested in the end of the space race being a hoax, who surelly investigated every inch of Nasa footage with magnifier never complained.
2) Extraordinary claims do need extraordinary evidences. That a man walked in the moon is an extraordinary claim. Do we have extraordinary evidences to support that? Yeah... Videos, witnesses, moon rocks, million of emplyees working in the project who never confessed... We went to the moon: The extraordinary claim now is to say we DIDN'T went to the moon. Is that claim supported by extraordinary evidences? Let' s see...
The "conspiranoia" was started with a book called "We never want to the moon", by Bill Kaysing. He claims to have worked for the NASA.
Let' s examinate this with an example:
If a man tells me that he was a mechanic of the Ferrari Formula 1 Scuderia and that all Michael Schumacher' s victories were a hoax, that he had some kind of "auto-pilot device", I might be inclined to believe him, since he was there and he could know about what he was telling; But... what about if he worked in the 80ies for an enterprise that would finally do screws for FIAT, before the Schumacher era, in spite of working in the Ferrari Formula 1 Scuderia? Would you believe him?
That' s what happens with Kaysing: He never worked for Nasa... He was a SPOKESMAN of an enterprise (Rocketdyne) that was doing components for the NASA. he abandoned the enterprise before the enterprise started working on the Saturn...
What does his book say? It' s a 87-page silly book with dozens of pics, photocopies, none of them related with the moon... Some of them include ladies in bikini, with claims like:
"The Nevada desert was chosen to film the hoaxes because there were a lot of nice girls and Casinos in Las Vegas, ideal for the pilots to relax after the missions"
So, according to Kaysing, Armstrong went to the "studio", filmed the hoax, and then went to "The Miracle" to play some hands of poker... Ok...
Some other "claims" by Kaysing include the assessination of the three astronauts in Apollo 1 because "They were going to tell the world the truth" Ok... That means that:
a)The Nasa knew they knew they were not going to arrive to the moon since the start of the project.
b)Grissom and the others knew about the hoax, were going to confess, but they agreed to participate on it. A bit contradictory.
Most of the other "evidences" come, surprisingly, from the arsenal of Nasa Footage... Those claims are very well known and have been already debunked.
And of course, the biggest evidence for WE DID GO TO THE MOON. Russians, the most interested in the end of the space race being a hoax, who surelly investigated every inch of Nasa footage with magnifier never complained.
I will probably test it...
You are great... I really liked you! I won' t spoil anything about BJ' s movie, but what you said and how you said it after seeing what you saw in the swings was awesome ^_^ Lots of laughs. Awakening you everymorning has been a pleasure!
